Skip to main content

Equality a far-fetched idea: Casteism prohibits normal persons to access public spaces

By Gagan Sethi*  

In Golana village of Central Gujarat, the Dalit hamlet, known as Vankar Vas, was getting overcrowded. Families were growing, and the 100-odd households in the Vas now had grown up children, some of whom had married. Almost every household had two families living in one room plus the outer courtyard. Blame it on overcrowding; family quarrels had become pretty common.
The year was 1984. With the cooperative now generating regular income for the Vankars who were its members, the young Turks of the Vas began pressuring the elders, called mahetars, to negotiate with upper caste Darbars, who controlled the panchayat, to allocate some common village land for housing.
However, Dalit’s claiming such a right, especially when elders knew that a big portion of the panchayat controlled common village land was encroached upon by few powerful Darbar families, was blasphemy.
The matter came up for discussion at a cooperative meeting, and those of us from the NGO who were working for promoting it suggested that we should talk over with the deputy mamlatdar at Cambay (now Khambhat) and ask for his intervention.
We met the gentleman, who seemed helpful. He suggested that we should make an application to the gram panchayat giving specific survey records showing the land that was encroached upon, giving population records of the census. A copy of the application and supporting documents should be forwarded to him.
Youngsters got together and began a house-to-house survey and signed the application. We had now to go to the panchayat office and hand over the application to the talati-cum-mantri and get a “received” signature, a common practice in government system. We convinced a few elders to accompany us, and a group of about dozen reached the panchayat office.
As we were about to enter in, I noticed three elders showing signs of uneasiness. I coaxed them to enter in, and especially told the talati, who sought to offer me a chair, that elders should be respected first.
We gave the application and took a “received” copy. We also issued a subtle warning to the talati that he should follow the law, and not act as per the whims of the Darbars. We returned to the hamlet, where others were eagerly waiting to listen to the outcome.
One of the elders, Shivakaka, started narrating the story. And tears started rolling down his eyes. Entering into the panchayat, and being offered a chair to sit, was something he could not imagine till then. Aged 60, he said, he till then had never entered the panchayat office. This was the first time when he not only entered in, but also was even offered a chair, on which he sat!
I realized how difficult it was for a poor Dalit to even access public spaces – it was, as if, a dream come true. And, to be able to be treated with dignity by offering a chair was beyond their imagination.
Even today caste system prohibits normal persons to access public spaces like panchayat buildings, police stations, and government offices. A recent study by Navsarjan – an organization started by Martin Macwan, and currently chaired by me – took a sample of 1,589 villages. It startlingly revealed the level of discrimination – untouchability practiced by upper castes on Dalits in access to public space.
In 55.6 percent villages, Dalits were allowed to enter into panchayat offices. In 54.7 percent villages they were not allowed to sit in the chaura, or the village square. And in 85 percent villages they were not allowed to participate in gram sabhas.
Without access to public institutions, equality and fraternity remain a dream for which assertion and struggle continue till date. Baba Ambedkar’s suspicion that there would be no change in the condition of Dalits unless there was separate electorate for them is yet to be belied.

*Founder of Janvikas & Centre for Social Justice. First appeared in DNA

Comments

TRENDING

There is need to distinguish between RT-PCR positives and clinical cases of Covid-19

Insisting on the need to distinguish between RT-PCR positives and clinical cases of Covid-19, an open letter by 20 doctors and medical professionals: *** Firstly the virus has gone through the Indian population enough and is now well established as an endemic infection which shall keep causing flu like illness in only few people as most will not even develop severe symptoms. The ICMR had already called for the suspension of testing anyone not having any symptoms (Jan 2022). Children have been shown to tackle the virus much easier than adults. Children also do not pass Covid infection to others that easily as adults do to children. Schools have opened and no single outbreak or incidences of severe disease have been documented. Therefore healthy children must not be tested for Covid anymore unless the treating doctor in hospitalised cases requires it. Calling people (children or adults) with RT-PCR positive report as “cases” is faulty. A “case” is a person who has disease and presents wi

Musician and follower of Dr Ambedkar? A top voilinist has this rare combination!

Some time back, a human rights defender, Vidya Bhushan Rawat, who frequently writes for Counterview, forwarded to me a video interview with Guru Prabhakar Dhakade, calling him one of India's well known violinists.  Dhakade is based in Nagpur and has devoted his life for the Hindustani classical music. A number of his disciples have now been part of Hindi cinema world in Mumbai, says Rawat. He has performed live in various parts of the country as well as abroad. What however attracted me was Dhakade's assertions in video about Dr BR Ambedkar, India's undisputed Dalit icon. Recorded several years back at his residence and music school in Nagpur, Dhakade not only speaks candidly about issues he faced, but that he is a believer in Dr Ambedkar's philosophy. It is in this context that Dhakade narrates his problems, even as stating that he is determined to achieve his goal. A violinist and a follower of Ambedkar? This was new to me. Rarely do musicians are found to take a

Define Dalit not by caste but action, belief; include all who oppose inequality

By Ajaz Ashraf* Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan’s endeavour has been to redefine the term Dalit and delink it from caste, best exemplified by the headline to this interview. An academician of repute, he financed his studies by working as wage labour. During his college days, he joined a group of non-Dalit intellectuals, comprising a professor each from the Christian, Parsi, Muslim and upper caste Hindu communities, to work with Dalits. Their work invited a backlash. On 25 January 1986, the reactionary landlords of the Darbar community in Golana village, Anand district, gunned down four of his colleagues, wounded another 18 and set houses on fire. This prompted Macwan to establish the Navsarjan Trust, which aims to skill Dalits and expand their consciousness regarding the systemic oppression of which they are principal victims. On 25 January 2002, on the anniversary of the Golana massacre , he led a march through rural Gujarat. His experience of the march had him write a book wherein