Skip to main content

Statue of Unity project to adversely impact livelihood, downstream biodiversity

Fence around proposed Shreshtha Bhawan 

By Trupti Shah, Rohit Prajapati, Krishnakant*
The National Green Tribunal (Western Zone), Pune bench, issued a notice on April 9, 2015 in the Application No. 32 of 2015 (Trupti Shah & Ors V/s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel RET & Ors) filed against the Statue of Unity project. The second hearing took place on April 16, 2015, and now the next date of hearing has been fixed for May 8, 2015. Since March 2015 authorities constructed fencing around the homes of six tribal families comprising of 70 people for the construction of the proposed Shreshtha (Bhrashta) Bharat Bhavan. Police force stands guard 24X7 outside the newly raised gate which the people have to pass through to access their homes and land – they feel as if they live in a veritable “open air prison”.
Since October 31, 2013 at the time of the laying of the foundational stone of the Statue of Unity project, activists have been writing to respondent authorities raising several important questions about the environmental and social impact of the project on the area and thousands of tribals’ life and livelihood. In several subsequent letters question was raised as to why the authorities have not secured the requisite environmental clearance and public hearing for this elaborated tourism project, but the authorities chose to remain silent and gave work order on October 27, 2014 to start the constructing for the project to the Larsen & Toubro Limited.
A group of concerned citizens – Trupti Shah, Girishbhai Patel, Krishnakant, Mahesh Pandya, Ghanshyam Shah, Chinu Srinivasan, Persis Ginwalla, Rohit Prajapati, Saroop Dhruv, and Rajnibhai Dave – filed a case, Application No 32/2015 (WZ) (Trupti Shah & Ors V/s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel RET & Ors), against the Statue of Unity project on March 23, 2015 in the National Green Tribunal (Western Zone) Pune bench asking for an immediate halt to all work on the Statue of Unity project at the Kevadia village of the Narmada district, Gujarat.
Well-known senior human rights lawyer who practices in the High Court of Mumbai, Gujarat and the Supreme Court of India, Mihir Desai, Lara Jesani (who practice in the High Court of Mumbai and the National Green Tribunal) and Asim Sarode (who practices in the National Green Tribunal, Pune) comprise the legal counsels for the case.
The first hearing took place at Pune on April 9, 2015 and notice was issued to the Chairman, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Rashtriya Ekta Trust (SVPRET), the chairman and managing director, Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd., the Chief Secretary, Government of Gujarat, the member secretary, State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority, the secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, and the chief executive officer and managing director, Larsen & Toubro Limited, and application was fixed for hearing on April 16, 2015. On April 16, 2015 the Government of Gujarat asked for time to file their reply and court granted May 8, 2015 for the next hearing.
The main demands of the application are:
Pass orders staying any and / or ongoing work with respect to the Statue of Unity project, or any component thereof in the Narmada District, Gujarat.
Direct the respondents to take adequate and necessary measures to ensure stoppage of any further work in the Statue of Unity project, or any component thereof.
Direct the Respondents to initiate legal action under Sections 15 and 16 of the Environmental (Protection) Act 1986 against the concerned individuals and companies that have started work or given permission for work of Statue of Unity project, or any component thereof.
Direct the Respondents to initiate legal action under Section 17 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 against the concerned officers who have failed to ensure complete compliance of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 before allowing commencement of the work in respect of Statue of Unity project.
Pending the hearing and final disposal of this application to restrain the Respondents from carrying out any further work in respect of Statue of Unity project, or any component thereof.
Direct the Respondent Nos 1 and 2 to take all necessary steps for restitution of the project area to its status quo ante.
Pass such other or further order/ orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice.

The Statue of Unity project, as is abundantly clear from the official website (www.statueofunity.in), is not simply the construction of a “mute monument”. It is an elaborate tourism project which includes its principal component, a 182 meter-tall iron statue of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel built over a project area of more than 120,000 sq.metres surrounded by a man-made lake (reservoir called Garudeshwar weir); a bridge connecting the statute to the mainland; improved roadway between the Statue and the Kevadia village; parking and transport site; and hotel and convention centre (Shreshtha Bharat Bhawan). These project components are proposed to be constructed as part of Phase I of the Statue of Unity project.
Phase II of the project will include the development of banks of river Narmada up to the Bharuch district; development of road, rail and tourist infrastructure; schools, colleges and universities for tribal development; education Research Centre and Knowledge City; tourism corridor from Garudeshwar to Bhadbhut; and clean technology research park and agriculture training centre. These are also part of the composite Statue of Unity project, although the project area of the same has not yet been revealed to the general public.
The environmental clearance required under the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification of September 2006 has not been sought for any component of this elaborate project. This is despite the fact that the Statue of Sardar Patel, which is the principal component of the project is to be constructed 3.2 kilometres from the Sardar Sarovar dam and adjacent to the Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary, the boundary of which touches the Sardar Sarovar reservoir, and on the right of the statue the Nana Thavadia village is part of Shoolpaneshwar sanctuary.
The project will involve extensive construction work in an active riverbed of a perennial river, Narmada, and also is likely to fall within a critical wetlands area as and when the same is to be notified under the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010. The construction of the project and tourism and other human activities after the completion of the project is bound to have adverse effects on the downstream river, its biodiversity, and the surrounding wetlands all of which has been ignored by the respondent authorities. It is also pertinent that for the world’s tallest statue, the respondent authorities have not even engaged in a social and environmental impact assessment which would shed light on the impact of the project and the resultant influx of migrant labourers and tourists on the livelihoods of the indigenous people who have been residing downstream from the project for generations.
The safety and disaster management component of the project has also been casually dealt with, which is particularly shocking seeing as how the construction for the project is on an active tectonic plate in a fault line area which is already burdened with the load of the Sardar Sarovar dam and its massive reservoir! Aside from the blatant violation of the EIA notification, wetland rules, and other relevant laws, the respondent authorities have gone to great lengths to evade public transparency and crush the people’s democratic opposition to the impugned project.
On October 31, 2013 at the time of the laying of the foundational stone of the Statue of Unity, civil society activists delivered a notice to the respondent authorities raising the question as to why the latter has not secured the requisite environmental clearance. Rather than responding to the concern raised, the respondent authorities illegally put some of the peaceful protesters under house arrest, even as detaining others. Further, in March 2015 fencing was constructed around the homes of six tribal families comprising 70 people who live near the site of the proposed Shreshtha (Bhrashta) Bharat Bhavan. Police force stands guard 24X7 outside the newly raised gate which the people have to pass through to access their homes and land – they feel as if they live in a veritable Open Air Prison. The terrorisation of the people continued on until March 28, 2015 when six peacefully protesting villagers and their three children were illegally arrested and held without proper food and facilities.
The respondents had asked for the time for reply. Now the case will be heard by the NGT on 8 May 2015.

*Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Vadodara

Comments

TRENDING

Sorry state of Indian academics: why was I thrown out of Delhi varsity interview room?

By Dr. Abhay Kumar*  The interview for the post of political science (Guest) was scheduled on Saturday afternoon, September 10, 2022. Given my previous experience, I was not willing to appear for it. But friends persuaded me to go and fight for our rights. I reached the college well before the time. When my turn came and I entered the room. The first question was asked about my experience. I said that I had taught for four semesters at NCWEB. I mentioned that I had taught ”Comparative politics”, “International Relations”, “Comparative Political Thoughts” and “Indian Government and Politics”. I said that as a teacher I had taught all the articles listed in the syllabus of the same Delhi University and the expert could ask anything about any reading or ideas. Friends, the first question asked by a female member, perhaps she is the principal of the college if I am not wrong, to give the full form of NCWEB! The second question asked by a male expert, perhaps he is the political science dep

Musician and follower of Dr Ambedkar? A top voilinist has this rare combination!

Some time back, a human rights defender, Vidya Bhushan Rawat, who frequently writes for Counterview, forwarded to me a video interview with Guru Prabhakar Dhakade, calling him one of India's well known violinists.  Dhakade is based in Nagpur and has devoted his life for the Hindustani classical music. A number of his disciples have now been part of Hindi cinema world in Mumbai, says Rawat. He has performed live in various parts of the country as well as abroad. What however attracted me was Dhakade's assertions in video about Dr BR Ambedkar, India's undisputed Dalit icon. Recorded several years back at his residence and music school in Nagpur, Dhakade not only speaks candidly about issues he faced, but that he is a believer in Dr Ambedkar's philosophy. It is in this context that Dhakade narrates his problems, even as stating that he is determined to achieve his goal. A violinist and a follower of Ambedkar? This was new to me. Rarely do musicians are found to take a

Tokens, symbols or incipient feminists? : First generation women sociologists in India

By IMPRI Team  The online event on the theme ‘Tokens, Symbols or Incipient Feminists? : The first Generation of Women Sociologists in India’ was held as an initiative of Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi under the #WebPolicyTalk series of The State of Gender Equality – #GenderGaps. Inaugurating the session, Zubiya Moin welcomed the speaker and participants to the program, followed by an introduction to the eminent panelists. Commencing the program, Prof Vibhuti Patel made her opening remarks welcoming Prof Kamla Ganesh, Feminist Sociologists and then greeted Prof Ratna Naidu and the editors of book ‘Reimaging Sociology in India: Feminist Perspective’, Dr Gita Chadha and Dr. Joseph M.T. along with Prof Arvinder Ansari and also welcomed all participants. She set up the stage by making us familiar with women sociologists and their works. Dr Gita Chadha, Editor of the book ‘Reimaging Sociology in India: Feminist Perspective’ After th

Omission of duty by BSF and police: Hindu forcefully kidnapped, taken to Bangladesh

Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), & National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI) writes to the Chairman, National Human Rights Commission: *** I am writing this to focus on the life and situation of the poor and marginalized villagers living alongside the Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal. Through the several complaints we made throughout the years to your good office, it is now evident that the people of this border are living in an acute crisis, not only from a financial perspective but also in terrible distress. The people of the border are devoid of their basic rights and are subjected to immense torture, harassment and restrictions mostly enacted by the Border Security Force personnel, who are supposed to be posted at the international borders with intentions to protect the Indian citizenry. However, on the contrary, incidents of victimizing Indian citizens are being witnessed at large by the BSF. 130 Bhot

Tamil Nadu govt claiming to reform Hindu religion, temples. People deserve better

By NS Venkataraman  For the last several decades, there have been hate campaign against Hinduism in Tamil Nadu in a subtle or not so subtle manner. Initially, it was a hate campaign against brahmins and the brahmins were abused, insulted and physically attacked. Fearing such conditions, many brahmin families left Tamil Nadu to settle down in other states in India or have gone abroad. Now, the brahmin population in Tamil Nadu is at microscopic level, for which these hate campaigners against brahmins were responsible. Later on, emboldened by the scenario of scared brahmin families not resisting and running away, the hate campaigners started focusing on Hindus. For some years, when M.G.Ramachandran and Jayalalitha were the chief ministers of the state, the hate Hindu campaigners were not much heard, as both these chief ministers were staunch believers in Hindu philosophy and have been offering prayers in temples in full public view. However, in the last eighteen months in

Emerging dimensions of India’s foreign policy in the context of global politics

By IMPRI Team  The three-day course took place recently, providing participants with an understanding of the development of Indian foreign policy, the complexity of geopolitics, and its flexibility to adjust to and even shape global outcomes. Many distinguished academics, senior scholars, former Indian diplomats, and journalists who are skilled observers and commentators of India’s foreign policy will serve as instructors for this course. Day 1 The three-day immersive online certificate training on “Emerging Dimensions of India’s Foreign Policy and Global Politics”, an initiative by the Center for International Relations and Strategic Studies (CIRSS) at IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), began on July 14th, 2022 at 5:00 PM (IST) on Zoom platform. Dr Souravie Ghimiray served as the emcee throughout the 3 days of the event and welcomed the distinguished speakers of Day 1. The esteemed panel on Day 1 consisted of, Dr Soumita Basu, Associate Professor, Department of Intern

Demographic parameters of India@75: resource allocation, political representation

By IMPRI Team  As per UN Population Prospects 2022, India is going to be the most populous country in the world. In this regard, IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi with #IMPRI Center for Human Dignity and Development (CHDD) , organized a panel discussion, #WebPolicyTalk, as part of the series The State of Population Development- #PopulationAnd Development on India@75: Most Populous Country? The moderator of the event was Mr Devender Singh, Global Studies Programme, University of Freiburg and a Visiting Senior Fellow at IMPRI. The panellists for the event were Prof P.M Kulkarni, Demographer, Retired Professor of Population Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University(JNU) , New Delhi; Dr U.V Somayajulu, Co-Founder, CEO and Executive Director, Sigma Research and Consulting ; Dr Sonia George, General Secretary, Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA), Kerala; Prof K.S James, Director and Senior Professor, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai. Th

Bhagawat Gita shows the way for the attitude to life and desirable goal of life

By NS Venkataraman*  When a mother delivers a human body, this body has no identity. Then, parents, relatives, friends consult each other and discuss the alternate appropriate names and arrive at a suitable name for this human body and this body is known and identified by this name. This human body, which steadily grow just like animals, plants and others and after experiencing the pleasures and pains of worldly life alternately for several years, perish one day, for the body to be burnt or buried. This body, bearing a name as it’s identity, comes in to the world and goes away from the world and the name that is the identity for the body also goes away along with the body. This is the scenario for several thousands of years that have gone by. The question: One question that does not seem to be still “convincingly explained” in a way that will appeal to the brain in the human body, is as to whether this human body only consists of flesh, bone and blood with well

Implementing misleading govt order to pollute Hyderabad's 100 year old reservoirs

Senior activists* represent to the Telangana Governor on GO Ms 69 dated 12.4.2022 issued by the Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MA&UD), Government of Telangana: ‘...restrictions imposed under para 3 of said GO Ms 111 dated 8.3.1996 are removed...’: *** Ref: GO Ms 111 dated 8.3.1996: ‘To prohibit polluting industries, major hotels, residential colonies or other establishments that generate pollution in the catchment of the lakes upto 10kms from full tank level as per list in Annexure-I...’ We come to your office with grievance that GO Ms 69 dated 12.4.2022 issued by Government of Telangana not only contains false information issued ‘By Order and in the name of the Governor of Telangana’ , without any scientific or expert reports, but also that implementation of the said GO is detrimental and can be catastrophic to the Hyderabad city as two 100 year old reservoirs Osman Sagar and Himayath Sagar were constructed as dams on river Moosa and river Esa, with the first and

Tattoos and intimidating gestures can't always win cricket matches for India

By Sudhansu R Das  Team India waited with baited breath for the outcome of the Pakistan vs Afghanistan match. Speculation was on about India’s return to the game if Pakistan loses to Afghanistan until Pakistan’s tailender, Naseem hit two massive sixes to win the match for Pakistan. Unfortunately, Afghanistan lost the match after being in a strong position till the last over of the game; two full touch balls in the final over turned the match into Pakistan side. The Afghanistan team would never forget this blunder and shock for a long time. India’s team management should introspect and take tough decision keeping in view of the tough match situation in the world cup matches. India lost two crucial matches in the Asia Cup. It could not defend a big total of 176 against Pakistan due to mediocre bowling attack, sloppy fielding and unimaginative captainship. It failed against Sri Lanka in similar fashion; it could not defend another respectable T 20 total of 171 runs. It was a pat