Skip to main content

Despite SC ruling, govts prefer retired babus to head information commissions

Excerpts from the report “State of Information Commissions and the Use of RTI Laws in India: Rapid Study 3.0 Based on the Annual Reports of Information Commissions (2012-14)”, prepared by research team headed by Venkatesh Nayak of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, Delhi:
***
On June 20, 2015, the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) completed a decade of existence. The text of this law was published in the Official Gazette June 21, 2005 and several provisions such as the appointment of Public Information Officers, First Appellate Authorities and Information Commissions and the requirement of improving records management, preparing for the proactive disclosure of a deal of information [Section 4(1)(b)] and the exemption for 18 security and intelligence organisations became operational immediately. Other provisions detailing the procedures through which people can access information or file appeals and complaints against delays in and denials of access became operational 125 days later in October.

Composition of and Vacancies in the Information Commissions

Sections 12(2) and 15(2) of the Central RTI Act permit the establishment of Information Commissions comprising of one Chief Information Commissioner and a maximum of ten Information Commissioners at the Central and State level, respectively. A total of 50 posts were created in 27 Information Commissions established during the years 2005-06.
In 2014-15, a total of 142 posts of Information Commissioners (including the Chief Information Commissioners) had been created across the country. A little more than 20% of these posts (Chief ICs and ICs) were lying vacant at the time of writing this report. In July 2014, the vacancy figure was considerably lesser at 14.28% (of 140 posts). At the time of writing this report, the total number of Information Commissioners serving across the country is 111- down from 120 in 2014.
As it was last year, the maximum number of vacancies (4) is in Jharkhand. Gujarat and Tamil Nadu with 3 vacancies each are close behind. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab have the largest number of serving SICs (10 each) followed by Andhra Pradesh and Haryana (9 each) and the Central Information Commission and Maharashtra (8 each).
Despite the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh into the successor States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, Telangana has not constituted its SIC yet. The SIC of Andhra Pradesh is hearing appeals and complaints submitted by residents of Telangana as well.

Background of Chief Information Commissioners

Sections 12(5) and 15(5) of the Central RTI Act contain a list of fields of experience and expertise from which candidates – men and women – may be chosen for filling up the posts of the Chief Information Commissioners and Information Commissioners at the Central and State level, respectively. The fields of expertise mentioned in both laws are – law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media and administration and governance.
Four State Information Commissions namely, those of Goa, Odisha, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand were headless at the time of writing this report as the State Chief Information Commissioners had retired (SCICs). The remaining 25 Information Commissions, including the Central Information Commission, are all being headed by retired civil servants. More than 3/4ths (76%) of the Chief Information Commissioners across the country are retired IAS officers. This proportion has gone up from 69% in 2012 to 74% 2014.
It appears that the Governments are increasingly preferring retired civil servants over candidates with other specialisations referred to in the twin RTI laws despite the Supreme Court advising the Governments to look beyond that pool in 2013. No retired High Court judges or persons with specialisation in journalism, mass media, science and technology or management are currently serving as Chief Information Commissioners anywhere across India.

Background of Central and State Information Commissioners

Only 12.6% of the Information Commissioners (11 out of 87) serving across the country are women. In 2014 there were 12 women ICs across the country. There are two women ICs in Andhra Pradesh. While the number of women ICs in Haryana has gone up from 1 to 2, there are no women ICs in Punjab and Tripura unlike in 2014. The appointment of the woman IC in Gujarat was quashed by the High Court for not having any of the specialisations specified in Section 15(5) of the Central RTI Act.
A little more than a third of the women ICs (4 of 11) are retired civil servants. A similar proportion of women ICs are from social service background. Two women ICs from Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu have a specialisation in law. The Woman IC from Andhra Pradesh is also an academic specialising in public administration. 42.5% (35 of 87) of the Information Commissioners across the country are retired civil servants belonging to either the All India Services or the State Civil Services. In 2014 this proportion was almost 50% and much higher at 53% in 2012. The proportion of retired bureaucrats appointed as ICs is slowly declining. Uttar Pradesh has the unique distinction of not having any retired career civil servant serving on the State Information Commission (the SCIC is a retired IAS officer though).
Almost 23% (20 of 87) ICs across the country are either retired judges or practised as advocates or have taught law as a subject at an academic institution. In 2014 this proportion was 21%. A little more than 17% of the Information Commissioners across the country have a specialisation in journalism or the mass media. Most ICs with these specialisations are serving in Uttar Pradesh (7).
The number of ICs with a specialisation in social service or social work has more than doubled in 2015 (from 3 to 7) as compared with the figures reported in 2014. This is a steady increase since 2012 when only 1 IC was from social service background.

How many RTI applications were filed across India?

Data culled out from the Annual Reports of the CIC and 12 SICs indicates that a total of 24.77 lakh applications were filed in those jurisdictions in a given year between 2012 and 2014. In 2013 the total number of RTI applications that we reported was 20.39 lakh based on data available up to the time of writing that report. As some more ICs have published their reports for that period subsequently, the revised figure stands at 24.94 lakh.
By extrapolating this data it can be conservatively estimated that about 45-50 lakh RTI applications may have been filed in various jurisdictions across the country during a 12-month period between 2012 and 2014. The actual figure may be closer to 50 lakh because several States where RTI is being used very prolifically, such as Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala have not reported their RTI applications statistics for the period under scrutiny in this report.
On the national scale the proportion of RTI users during an year between 2012-14 may will be between 0.37% – 0.41% of the population (of 121 crore). As a proportion of the electorate – aged 18 years and above – between 0.5% – 0.6% of them might have used the RTI laws. Despite a decade of the Central RTI Act being in existence and the J&K RTI Act being in existence for more than five years the proportion of RTI users has not risen to even 0.5% of the population or even 1% of the electorate.
The Central Government tops the list of jurisdictions receiving the most number of RTI applications in 2013-14 at 8.34 lakhs (73% public authorities reporting). Maharashtra comes in second with 7.03 lakh RTI applications received in 2014 followed by Karnataka in the 3rd place with 4.25 RTI applications, Gujarat at 4th place with 1.72 lakh RTI applications and Rajasthan taking the 5th place with 1.40 lakh RTI applications filed by citizens. With 1.40 lakh RTI applications filed in 2013-14, Rajasthan recorded almost double (97% increase) the number of requests reported in the previous year. Gujarat has reported a 41% increase in the number of RTI applicants in 2013-14 while Karnataka has witnessed a 31% increase in the number of RTI applications at 4.25 during the same period as compared to the previous year.
In Odisha 52,305 requests were filed in 2011-12 this number fell by 17.76% to 43,011 in 2012-13. Himachal Pradesh also reported an 18% decline in the number of RTI applications filed in 2012-13 (61,202) as compared to the previous year, this could be due partly to a 16.6% decline in the number of public authorities (110) reporting their RTI statistics to the SIC as compared to 2011-12 (132 public authorities).
Only two SICs have captured gender break up of RTI applicants. In Chhattisgarh women constituted 6.9% of the RTI applicants while in Nagaland they comprise 2.53% of the RTI applicants. None of the other ICs including the CIC have captured gender breakups in their annual reports. The available data shows that the proportion of women RTI applicants could be significantly lesser than the 8% figure reported in the RAAG-2 report published last year.
In Maharashtra individuals from BPL families constituted 1.11% of the total number of RTI applicants, while in Chhattisgarh this proportion was 4.16%, and Mizoram and Nagaland have reported 3 and 9 BPL applicants respectively. No other State has captured the economic profile of the RTI applicants. In Chhattisgarh 6.37% of the RTI applicants belonged to the Scheduled Castes. This proportion has nearly doubled since 2013. RTI applicants from the Scheduled Tribes constitute 5.5% of the total. In 2013 they constituted only 3.06% of the total. No other State has captured the caste profile of RTI applicants in this manner. The steady increase in the absolute numbers as well as in terms of percentage augurs well for the success of the RTI Act as it is primarily aimed at empowering the disadvantaged segments of society to hold government and its instrumentalities accountable.
In Chhattisgarh, the only State which continues to capture the urban-rural breakup of RTI applicants in its Annual Reports, less than a fifth of the applicants (19.85%) were living in villages. This proportion has reduced from 21% in 2012 even though there was a 21% rise in the number of RTI applications received across the State.

Public Authorities Receiving the Most Number of RTI Applications

As in the previous years, with more than 18% of the RTI applications coming its way, the Ministry of Finance in the Central Government topped the list of Ministries/Departments receiving the most number of RTI applications in 2013-14. This figure appears large due to the fact a large number of requests are filed with public sector banks and the tax authorities which fall under its jurisdiction. Standing alone, the Ministry of Railways comes second with 11.11% of the total number of RTI applications being filed with it, followed by the Ministries of Home Affairs (6.23%), Human Resource Development (6.21%) and the Communications and Information Technology (3.81%) taking the 3rd, 4th and 5th places, respectively. Together, the public authorities under these Ministries accounted for 45.41% of the RTI applications filed with the Central Government in 2013-14.
Individually, the Ministry of Railways (10.77%) the Department of Posts (8.17%), Delhi Police (3.61%), State Bank of India (3.17%) and BSNL (2.84%) rank amongst the top 5 public authorities receiving the most number of RTI applications in 2013-14. Together they received 28.56% of the RTI applications filed with the Central Government in 2013-14.
The Revenue, the Urban and Rural Development Departments and the Education come up more frequently than other departments receiving the most number of RTI applications in the 12 jurisdictions for which data is available. The Revenue Department tops the list of departments in the States of Karnataka (29.41%), Mizoram (9.42%), Odisha (28.86%) and Jammu and Kashmir (14.88%). The rural Development Department topped the list in Chhattisgarh (14.85%) and Himachal Pradesh (10.86%), while the Urban Development Department topped the list in Gujarat (24.91%) and Maharashtra (30.58%). In other States both departments vie with each other for the 2nd or 3rd position.
In Maharashtra the top 5 departments received 72% of the RTI applications filed across the State in 2014. Of this the Departments of Urban Development, Revenue and Forests and Rural Development and Water Conservation received more than a half of the RTI applications filed (60.42%). In Karnataka the Departments of Revenue and Urban and Rural Development received close to 2/3rds of the RTI applications (63.40%).
The Department of Education figures frequently amongst the top 5 in the States of Gujarat (3.22%), Himachal Pradesh (5.83%), Karnataka (4.73%), Nagaland (8.5%), Odisha (13.99%), Rajasthan (7.47%) and Jammu and Kashmir (11.23%).
The Home Department including the Police and Prisons topped the list in Rajasthan (28.68%) and Meghalaya (9.33%). Its counterparts figured amongst the top five in the States of Gujarat (17.26%), Himachal Pradesh (8.94%), Maharashtra (5.55%), Mizoram (7.75%) and Jammu and Kashmir (8.45%).The Department of Forests appear to be receiving more and more RTI applications during the period under study as compared with our 2013 report. This Department figures amongst the top 5 in the States of Maharashtra (22.34% – albeit along with the Revenue Dept.), Chhattisgarh (9.77%), Meghalaya (7.09%) and Mizoram (4.10%).

Proportion of rejections at the RTI application stage

The Central Government reported the highest proportion of rejection of RTI applications i.e., 35.62% for reasons other than Sections 8, 9, 11 and 24 of the RTI Act. Karnataka comes in at second place with the public authorities rejecting more than a 30% of the RTI applications for reasons not specified in the Act. In Gujarat close to a fifth of the RTI applications – 19.5% were rejected for reasons other than the exemptions recognised under the Act. Meghalaya SIC’s report does not contain similar breakup figures.
Section 8(1)(j) relating to the personal privacy of individuals was the most frequently invoked of exemptions by public authorities under the Central Government and the Government of Karnataka. More than a third of the RTI applications in Karnataka (33.15%) were rejected by public authorities invoking this clause. Under the Central Government 23% of the RTI applications were rejected by public authorities invoking the protection for personal privacy. In Gujarat this figure was a little more than 10%. However Section 9 which protects private copyright and Section 11 which protects confidential information about third parties account for more than 20% of the rejections in Gujarat.
Under the Central Government Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act pertaining to commercial confidence, trade secrets and intellectual property rights was the 2nd most frequently invoked exemption to reject RTI applications at 13.37%. In Karnataka Section 8(1)(h) of the Act pertaining to impediments in the investigation, arrest or prosecution process was the 2nd most frequently invoked exemption – 11.53%.
In Gujarat, 6.2% of the RTI applications were rejected for reasons specified in Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act which pertains to national security and specified national interests of the State including foreign relations. In Karnataka public authorities invoked Section 8(1)(a) in 4.8% of the cases to reject RTI applications. Under the Central Government, Section 8(1)(a) accounted for only 0.05% of the rejections although in terms of absolute numbers, more RTI applications were rejected as compared to these two States.
In Gujarat 23.5% of the RTI applications were rejected under Section 24 as they pertained to security and intelligence organisations exempted by the Government from the ordinary obligations of transparency like other public authorities. In comparison, Section 24 was invoked only in 6.52% of the cases where RTI applications were filed with the Central Government. Karnataka SIC has not reported the use of Section 24 for rejections during the current period.

Click HERE to download full report

Comments

TRENDING

CAG’s audit report creates a case for dismantling of UIDAI, scrapping Aadhaar

By Gopal Krishna  The total estimated budget of the biometric UID/Aadhaar number project and its cost: benefit analysis has not been disclosed till date. Unless the total estimated budget of the project is revealed, all claims of benefits are suspect and untrustworthy. How can one know about total savings unless the total cost is disclosed? Can limited audit of continuing expenditure of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), an instrumentality of Union of India be deemed a substitute for total estimated budget of the biometric UID/Aadhaar number project of UIDAI? It has been admitted by CAG that the audit of functioning of the UIDAI is partial because of non-transparency. The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India arising from performance audit of functioning of the UIDAI for the period from 2014-15 to 2018-19 is incomplete because it is based on statistical information “to the extent as furnished by UIDAI” upto March 2021. There is also a need to compa

Women for Water: WICCI resource council for empowering women entrepreneurs, leaders

By Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The Water Resources Council of the Women’s Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry is formed for 2022-24. A National Business Chamber for Women, the Women’s Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry ( WICCI ) is a premier association empowering women entrepreneurs and leaders in all walks of life through advocacy, pro-active representations to government, implementing projects for women via funds allocated by various government agencies and corporates, plus bringing awareness on all issues that concern women. WICCI boosts and builds women’s entrepreneurship and businesses through greater engagement with government, institutions, global trade and networks. WICCI enables fundamental changes in governmental policies, laws, incentives and sanctions through proper channel, with a view to robustly encourage and empower women in business, industry and commerce across all sectors. WICCI is supported by the massive global networks of ALL Ladies League (ALL), Women Eco

75 yrs of water in India: whither decentralised governance to sustain the precious resource?

By Shubhangi Rai, Megha Gupta, Fawzia Tarannum, Mansee Bal Bhargava Looking into the last century, water resources management have come a long way from the living with water in the villages to the nimbyism and capitalism in the cities to coming full cycle with room for water in the villages. With the climate change induced water crisis, the focus on conservation and management of water resources if furthered in both national and local agenda. The Water management 2021 report by NITI Aayog acknowledges that water and sustainability are of immense importance for the sustenance of life on earth. Water is intricately linked to the health, food security and livelihood. With business as usual, India’s water availability will only be enough to meet 50% of its total demand and 40% of the population in India will have no access to drinking water and sanitation by 2030 . Its Composite Water Management Index 2021 states that ‘India is suffering from the worst water crisis in its history and mil

Grassroot innovations in water management: Policy challenges amidst climate change

By Shubhangi Rai[1], Megha Gupta[2], Mansee Bal Bhargava[3] India despite of having a vast traditional water management history continue to struggle with water crisis from disasters like floods and droughts but more with social distress leading to asymmetric access to water goods and services. The rising water crisis in a country that is abundant in water resources and wisdom is worth questioning and resolving. The knowledge that was passed on by our ancestors who used a diverse range of structures that helped harvest rainwater locally besides replenish and recharge the groundwater along the way. Formal and informal rules were locally crafted by the community on who to use the water, how much to use, when to use, how to penalise for misuse, how to resolve conflicts and many more. As a nation, we need to revive our dying wisdom of the traditional water management systems and as water commons, enable the governing mechanisms towards sustainability. In the session on ‘ Grassroot Innovatio

Need to destroy dowry, annihilate greed and toxic patriarchy in India

By IMPRI Team Talking about an evil ever-persistent in our society and highlighting the presence of toxic patriarchy, #IMPRI Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC) , IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi organized a panel discussion on Destroy Dowry: Annihilation of Greed and Toxic Patriarchy in India under the series The State of Gender Equality – #GenderGaps on May 4, 2022. The chair for the event was Prof Vibhuti Patel, Former Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai and a Visiting Professor, IMPRI. The distinguished panel included – Asha Kulkarni, General Secretary at Anti Dowry Movement, Mumbai ; Kamal Thakar, Sahiyar Stree Sangathan ; Adv Celin Thomas, Advocate at Celin Thomas and Associates, Bengaluru; Shalini Mathur, Honorary Secretary, Suraksha Dahej Maang Virodhi Sanstha Tatha Parivar Paraamarsh Kendra, Lucknow and Secretary, Nav Kalyani Foundation, Gender Resource and Training Centre; and Dr Bharti Sharma, Honorary Secretary, Shakti Shalini

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Implications for India and emerging geopolitics

By IMPRI Team In the backdrop of the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, #IMPRI Center for International Relations and Strategic Studies (CIRSS) , IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi hosted a panel discussion on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: Implications for India and Emerging Geopolitics. The event was chaired by Ambassador Anil Trigunayat (IFS Retd.), Former Ambassador to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Libya, and Malta; Former Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of India, Moscow. The panelists of the event were Prof Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu, Clinical Professor, Center for Global Affairs, New York University; H.E. Freddy Svane, Ambassador, Royal Danish Embassy, New Delhi; Maj. Gen. (Dr) P. K. Chakravorty, Strategic Thinker on Security Issues; and T. K. Arun, Senior Journalist, and Columnist. Ambassador Anil Trigunayat commenced the discussion by stating the fact that wars are evil. He opines that no war has ever brought peace and prosperity to any country and

Impact of climate change on Gujarat pastoralists' traditional livelihood

By Varsha Bhagat-Ganguly, Karen Pinerio* We are sharing a study[1] based learning on climate resilience and adaptation strategies of pastoralists of Kachchh district, Gujarat. There are two objectives of the study: (i) to examine the impact of climate on traditional livelihood of pastoralists of Gujarat state; and (ii) to explore and document the adaptation strategies of pastoralists in mitigating climate adversities, with a focus on the role of women in it. In order to meet these objectives, the research inquiries focused on how pastoralists perceive climate change, how climate change has impacted their traditional livelihood, i.e., pastoralism in drylands (Krätli 2015), and how these pastoral families have evolved adaptation strategies that address climate change (CC)/ variabilities, i.e., traditional livelihood of pastoralists of Kachchh district, Gujarat state. Pastoralism is more than 5,000 years old land-use strategy in India; it is practised by nomadic (their entire livelihood r

Making Indian cities disaster, climate resilient: Towards actionable urban planning

By IMPRI Team  Three-Day Online Certificate Training Programme on “Making Indian Cities Disaster and Climate Change Resilient: Towards Responsive and Actionable Urban Planning, Policy and Development”: Day 1 A three day Online Certificate Training Programme on the theme “Making Indian Cities Disaster and Climate Change Resilient: Towards Responsive and Actionable Urban Planning, Policy and Development”, a joint initiative of the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) , Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, was held at the Centre for Habitat, Urban and Regional Studies at IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi. Inaugurating the session Ms. Karnika Arun, Researcher at IMPRI, welcomed the speakers and participants to the program with an introduction to the eminent panellists. Day 1 of the program included Prof Anil K Gupta, Head ECDRM, NIDM, New Delhi and Mr Tikender Singh Panwar, Former Deputy Mayor, Shimla; Visiting Senior Fellow, IMPRI as conveners, an

Gender gap: Women face disproportionate barriers in accessing finance

By IMPRI Team Women worldwide disproportionately face barriers to financial access that prevents them from participating in the economy and improving their lives. Providing access to finance for women is crucial for financial inclusion and, consequently, inclusive growth. To deliberate and encourage dialogue and discussion for growth, the Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC) of IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, organized a web policy talk by Mr S. S. Bhat, Chief Executive Officer Friends of Women’s World Banking India, Ahmedabad on ‘Access to Finance for Women’ as a part of its series The State of Gender Equality – #GenderGaps. The session was started by the moderator, Chavi Jain, by introducing the speaker and the discussants and inviting Prof. Vibhuti Patel to start the deliberation. Importance of access to finance for women Prof. Vibhuti Patel, Visiting Professor, IMPRI, New Delhi; Former Professor, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, began by expre

Environment governance in small cities: Need for external intervention, capacity building

By IMPRI Team  The debate over environmental degradation has acquired substantial traction in recent years. Governments, civil communities and international organisations are all working to mitigate the environmental costs of economic expansion and growth. These reforms have also brought to light the concept of environmental governance in emerging towns, which refers to political changes aimed at influencing environmental activities and outcomes. It is under this backdrop that the #IMPRI Centre for Habitat, Urban and Regional Studies (CHURS) , IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi hosted a talk on Small Cities and Environmental Governance in Gujarat and West Bengal: Need for External Intervention or Capacity Building? as a part of #WebPolicyTalk series- The State of Cities – #CityConversations on January 28, 2022. The talk was chaired by Dr Soumyadip Chattopadhyay, an Associate Professor, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan and a Visiting Senior Fellow, IMPRI, New Delhi. The