Why did Govt of India maintain ominous silence in PepsiCo case against Gujarat farmers?: Activists

PepsiCo India Holdings Ltd, which withdrew their legal suits against the farmers at the Commercial Court of Ahmedabad and the district court of Modasa, have done it under intense public and political pressure, farmers’ rights groups have asserted in a statement, warning, this in no way means that the public campaign is over. The battle is only half won on the field. The Government of India maintained an ominous silence on the issue, taking cover of the matter being sub judice.
Addressing media, their advocate Anand Yagnik stated that these farmers are into subsistence farming and not commercial farming. It must be kept in mind that in India the right of farmer to cultivate land and agricultural produce is superior to the right of MNCs seeking protection in the name of registration. The law of India allows farmers to use even registered seeds and take produce.
Kapilbhai Shah, Coordinator, Beej Adhikar Manch, a newly formed platform to protect farmers’ seed sovereignty, recalled, when PepsiCo India made an application in February 2012 to the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Authority for the registration of a particular potato variety, it had given a Declaration that it shall abide by all the provisions and guidelines of the PPV&FR Act 2001. It is highly objectionable that having agreed to compliances of registration, the company tried to find ‘long term amicable solution to protect its variety’ with the help of government.
Dr Rajendra Khimani, President of Gujarat Association of Agricultural Sciences, said any reference to some discussions that PepsiCo India was having with government was not acceptable, when such discussions did not involve the affected farmers and farmers’ organisations and when there was no need for such discussions in the first instance.
Khimani added, the Gujarat government can neither persuade nor dictate to farmers of this state that they need to take permission from some company that is claiming exclusive rights which then means that the government itself would be misleading the farmers on the law of the land.

Comments

ALSO READ...

Demand for 50% EVM verification with VVPATs: Missed call campaign set to cross 1 lakh mark

Gujarat CM queried: Where has 24.81 acre feet of water disappeared from Narmada dam?

Congress separated itself from anti-Sikh mob, Modi became friend of rioting 2002 mob: Time

Sexual harassment allegation: President of India told to ask CJI to abstain from performing duties

Indian industry's sales levels, profit margins drastically go down: IIM-A survey

Central, Gujarat govts told to clarify: Why hide facts on pollution in Narmada Dam, canals?

Vidyasagar statue vandalization culmination of hate culture: Gujarat memorandum

No minority community midday meal scheme cook-cum-helper in Gujarat: Govt of India

Costs of environmental damage due to illegal mining in Gir-Somnath, Junagadh sought