Skip to main content

Caste played major role in Ahmedabad’s controversial struggle to procure sewers

Ranchchodlal Chhotalal
Reproduced below are excerpts from an interesting detailed research work, “Coprology and Caste: The Status of Sewerage in Ahmedabad, India”, written by Stephanie Tam, published as a Working Paper No. 12-002 February 2012, published by the Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Northwestern University:
***
Ahmedabad’s struggle to procure sewers was highly controversial, as debates raged over the public’s state of enlightenment and the impact it would have upon caste structures. Unlike Bombay and Delhi, Ahmedabad remained relatively independent of British rule, and had its own municipal government consisting primarily of Western-educated professionals. Its first municipal president was a successful millowner who applied his industrial ingenuity to reducing the city’s alarming mortality rates, proposing underground sewers after reading the British Army Sanitary Commission’s attribution of disease to lack of drainage.
Ranchhodlal Chhotalal’s 1886 sewerage proposal promoted a sewerage scheme written five years earlier by public works engineer Colonel Walter Ducat, and quickly came under fire from both foreigners and locals. British civil servant Theodore C. Hope found sewers impractical for Ahmedabad, given, “on the part of the people, an absence of intelligence and hearty co-operation, and a poverty which can ill bear the risks of a costly experiment”. Ahmedabadis were deemed too ignorant and too poor to handle sophisticated new technology, especially since their more esteemed countrymen in “great and rich presidency towns” had failed to do so. Sewers denoted the hierarchy of Indian cities, and Ahmedabad’s ambitions exceeded the city’s stature, threatening to destabilize the ladder of enlightenment and advancement that grounded British power structures in India.
As an emerging Western technology, Hope thought underground sewerage “too far advanced for the present stage of average intelligence and civilization” in Ahmedabad, invoking notions of progress and refinement to establish Western superiority over backward “natives”. While he could not deny that Ahmedabad’s sanitary ambitions evinced an elevated “civic sense”, Hope was unwilling to concede that sewers were appropriate for the city, distinguishing between sanitary consciousness and sanitary capacity to keep the city in its designated place on the social ladder.
Sewerage’s aura of progress drove Chhotalal’s campaign to sanitize Ahmedabad. In an 1886 letter, Chhotalal described Ducat’s scheme as a “modern under-ground sewage system”, portraying the project as state-of-the-art in contrast to the city’s extant open-air sewers that needed to be manually cleaned. Indeed, Chhotalal’s biographer depicted him as a modern man who promoted the “rules of sanitary science” and believed in empirical knowledge. His attitude was un-Indian in the way he “besought his colleagues to set their faces sternly against the fatalism, so prevalent among the people of India”, and fought on the side of science against native custom.
Chhotalal’s Western qualities were deemed righteous in attempting “to ameliorate the material conditions and circumstances of life”, linking Western science to social justice. Hope made the moral implications of sanitation clear in his description of Chhotalal’s “humane efforts” as “just and proper”, imbuing sewerage technology with ethical impetus. Ethics echoed from Chhotalal’s repeated assertions that sewerage was a civic responsibility, and alongside the construction of Ahmedabad’s sewerage, Ahmedabad’s moral public was formed. In the hands of social reformers, “civic sense” possessed a moral dimension that exceeded good breeding.
“Civic sense” came to be understood as “that sense of humanity, - the knowledge that mankind is one and must henceforth be dealt with from that standpoint”. It signified equality and mutual respect, a moral consciousness that indicated one was part of humanity. Chhotalal made a moral argument for sewerage premised upon residents’s right to live, focusing on mortality reduction and establishing that Ahmedabadis are as deserving of a sanitary environment as any other population. Although he asked for Ahmedabadis to be considered as equals to other sewered populations, Chhotalal omitted mention of the sanitary inequalities internal to Ahmedabad’s populace. Ahmedabadis’s “civic sense” pertained to a select public’s well-being – the public that did not have to jeopardize its health every day cleaning up the city’s excrement.

Caste Controversy

Ahmedabad’s sanitation workers were Bhangis, a caste of Untouchables that was privately employed by neighborhoods to manually remove faeces from dry latrines, empty out cesspools, and sweep gutters. Since they were the only people who were willing to handle excrement, the entire city was dependent upon them, and higher castes became resentful of the Bhangis’s power over the city’s hygiene. Moreover, Bhangis profited from collecting residents’s night-soil by selling it as manure to farmers.
Sewerage threatened their employment and their source of additional income, while it simultaneously seemed to liberate them from demeaning labour. The socioeconomic structures that both bound and empowered Bhangis were endangered, and local opposition to Chhotalal’s proposal grew as sewerage’s implications upon caste divisions became clearer. Chhotalal strategically made no mention of sewerage’s impact upon the Bhangis, discussing sweepers only in the context of their failure to clean sufficiently. He pointed out that “[t]he Municipal Bhungees will only clean the cess-pool once a day and some portion of the foul water will always remain in the cess-pool”, while sewerage would eliminate every trace of excrement from residential areas in a timely manner.
By evaluating Bhangis only in terms of efficiency and effectiveness, Chhotalal represented them as sanitation instruments, and glossed over the larger social framework that defined their occupation. Occupation and caste had become synonymous by the 1880s, as Ahmedabad’s population grew and the need for a sanitation workforce increased. All Bhangis who migrated into cities were absorbed into the sanitation industry, and soon it became unthinkable for them to perform any other kind of work.16 The caste system itself became known as “but another name for division of labour”, albeit a confining division that restricted Bhangis to menial activities and freed upper castes from repulsive tasks.
Chhotalal’s sewerage proposal did not simply replace manual sanitation with mechanized sanitation, but challenged the correspondence between caste and occupation. Freed from sanitation work, Bhangis could take over occupations allotted to other castes, thereby blurring caste divisions and threatening hereditary occupational privileges. It was Hope who bluntly pointed out that the sewerage scheme implied “the abandonment of the existing system of removing the foecal matter, or night-soil, by hand” from dry latrines, as well as eliminating “the collection of all the night-soil and sullage water” from cesspools.
Moreover, Hope made clear that sewerage would entail sanitary equality, stating that, “it should be distinctly realized that under a system of underground drainage, every house in the city ought to be connected with the sewer”. Sharing piped drinking water with lower castes was so objectionable to upper castes that for the first while they would not use it, and sharing a sanitation system met with a similar reaction. Ahmedabadis were not ready to embrace a “civic sense” that contested caste divisions and caste-based occupations. Exposing the social structures that sewerage would upset, Hope’s letter became a powerful weapon in the hands of Chhotalal’s opposition.
Despite its condescending portrayal of Ahmedabadis as uncivilized and unintelligent, the letter was circulated widely throughout Ahmedabad and published in the Bombay Gazette. The general public, the local press, and even Chhotalal’s colleagues were so incensed by the sewerage proposal that they held daily mass meetings to protest against it. Chhotalal often attended these meetings to defend his proposal, but it was to no avail, and during one meeting he was pelted with garbage and stones. Although he was escorted back to his home unharmed, the pelting’s intent was to signify punishment rather than inflict physical injury.
Pelting was an aggregated assault that allowed every member of the community to participate – a communal act that spoke to the aggressors’s perception of Chhotalal as a threat to communal identity. His sewerage proposal shook the very core of Ahmedabad society, and instigated a collective response that resembled the stoning that would take place during the city’s caste riots decades later. The body is central to both caste and sewerage, and corporeal punishment reflected the public’s desire for the body to adhere to an accustomed order.

Disciplining the Sanitary Body

In his 1850 writings about British sanitation, Herbert Spencer “had sensed that the issue in sanitary reform was not the disposal of wastes. Fundamentally the issue was the desire of someone […] to force him to perform in a manner officially prescribed, and not freely chosen”. Sewering Ahmedabad was not a topographic project, but a new regime of corporeal governance. To sanitize the city, its residents had to conform to new ways of living and relating to their bodies. The existing sanitation system consisted of individual cesspools or khalkuvas for each house, which received household sullage and liquid human waste. Solid human waste remained in the latrines, and was cleaned up by the Bhangis every day.
Wastewater in khalkuvas was expected to seep into the subsoil, but because of Ahmedabad’s high water table, it ended up in the groundwater that was used for drinking and kept the ground damp and foul-smelling.24 Homeowners with khalkuvas consumed as little water as possible and could not use their cesspools during the rainy season for fear of overflow. Whenever they had an opportunity, they would depose some of the sewage onto the street. However, 80% of homes did not have khalkuvas and were supposed to place their wastewater in large iron pans in the streets or courtyards for daily collection.
Frequently, these households simply threw sewage onto the streets at night when Sanitary Inspectors were not around.26 Water consumption, defecation and bathing were carefully and consciously performed. Dry latrines were prevalent, with excreta being left on a stone, plate, or bucket to be collected by Bhangis. Given that Bhangis cleaned only once a day, faecal matter and the smell of human waste were a constant presence, and residents were desensitized to them.
Sewerage proposed to change the relationship of residents to excreta, whisking away human waste once it was produced so that it was no longer an accepted presence. Residents would acquire a heightened sense of disgust towards it, and become distant and detached from it. The act of defecation itself would change with the advent of manually flushed squat latrines that accompanied sewers. While dry latrines permitted some latitude for where defecation occurred, squat latrines were fixed locations with a narrow pit that faeces had to be deposited in.
Defecation would become a much more constrained act, and a much more private one. One’s faeces would be seen only by oneself, and would no longer need to be touched by others in order to be removed. Tam 9 In diminishing the corporeal intimacy between Bhangis and faeces, sewerage proposed to diminish the relationship between caste pollution and touch. Some late 19th-century Hindu reformers considered the untouchability of Bhangis an occupational pollution, justifying their low social status through their daily contact with excreta. Moreover, contamination through touch is central to the way that untouchability is practiced: not only are Bhangis to be kept away from upper caste bodies, all objects and spaces that come into contact with Bhangis are defiled and not to be touched by upper castes. If pollution is transmitted through touch and Bhangis no longer had to be in physical contact with excreta, the source and nature of Bhangi contamination became questionable.
While upper castes that accidentally touched Bhangis could purify themselves through ablutions, Bhangis could not cleanse themselves of their contamination. Theirs was an ontological pollution that was conflated with occupational pollution, a permanent state of defilement that overlapped with polluting events. Their contact with excreta both justified and was justified by their polluted status. Sewerage threatened to break the circular logic of Bhangi contamination by eliminating their contact with faeces, leaving their contamination a myth realized through performative acts rather than a microbiological reality. Sanitary science prized empirical evidence, and challenged the validity of untouchability’s mythic premises.
Sewerage also proposed to eliminate the punishing labours that positioned Bhangis on the lowest rungs of Ahmedabad society. Prior to flush toilets, Bhangis went from door to door, accessing dry latrines through a cleaning entrance so as not to pollute the house and its occupants. They half-crawled into pits to retrieve faeces, loaded them onto leaky baskets atop their heads, emptied them onto carts and trekked to the Sabarmati River or outside of Ahmedabad’s walls to dispose of them. Physical exertion characterized their occupation as much as contact with faeces. Despite their toils, they were stereotyped as “feeble of mind and body”, undercutting the athletic power that their work entailed.
Their labour was not perceived as physical training but as physical punishment: rather than gaining prowess from their exertions, Tam 10 they suffered from them. Labour was a means of disciplining their bodies into submission, instilling a corporeal order that threatened to be overturned by sewerage’s redefinition of Bhangi labour. Caste hierarchy was about to undergo tumultuous changes with the construction of underground sewers. Sanitation was civically desirable but socially undesirable, as it changed community relationships into human-machine relationships.
Relative standings among castes were part of how community status was constructed, and the replacement of sweepers with sewers rocked the lowest regions of the caste structure. Although residents would become increasingly sensitive to excreta, they would no longer be able to displace their disgust onto Bhangis as easily as they used to. Moreover, pollution would no longer be spatially controlled and contained through the body of the Bhangi. While Bhangis could be relegated to the back door, sewers were ubiquitous and transgressed public/private boundaries, running underneath streets and into homes.
The public realm of the street that once received illegal sewage deposits bled into the clean, domestic haven. Opponents to Chhotalal’s proposal described sewerage as “unpractical, doctrinaire, still in the experimental stage elsewhere […] and dangerous to health”, with one writer claiming that streets would be poisoned by sewer gas. Sewers made excreta invisible and dynamic, doing away with the security of tangible and locatable faeces that was handled by humans. Even though it was contained within pipes, excreta became immanent in Ahmedabad’s environment, making defilement difficult to assess.

Ahmedabad’s First Sewer

Despite significant resistance to it, Ahmedabad’s first sewer was laid in 1893 in the Khadia ward. The political strife that led up to its installment played out primarily between Ahmedabad’s municipal government and the larger Bombay Presidency that governed the region. Although Ahmedabad’s drainage sub-committee approved Chhotalal’s proposal in November 1886, the Municipality vetoed sewerage and favoured improving existing manual methods of faecal removal instead. The Municipality’s decision was contested by the North Division Commissioner and the Sanitary Commissioner of the Bombay Presidency, who were convinced that improving manual methods was a makeshift solution to the city’s sanitation problem.
In spite of the Commissioners’s opinion, the Municipality confirmed its intentions to improve manual removal in 1888, and Chhotalal himself was won over by his opposition to recommend the Municipality’s decision against sewerage to the Bombay Presidency. Bombay flatly refused to permit the Municipality’s scheme, and the Municipality finally agreed to install an experimental sewer on May 14th, 1888. The Bombay Commissioners had a very different view of sewerage than Hope did. While Hope thought that sewerage’s success was dependent upon a civilized populace, the Commissioners believed that sewerage would create a civilized populace. 
Chhotalal and the Bombay Commissioners mistrusted a sanitation system that gave sanitary independence to the people. Ahmedabadis had shown that they could not be controlled through legal regulations, illegally depositing sewage in the streets so commonly that prosecuting every instance was far beyond the Municipality’s resources. Hope had supported improving manual removal because it was “in principle indigenous and national to India”, but Chhotalal and the Commissioners were not interested in relying upon indigenous habits that had proven to be unsanitary and incorrigible. Their solution was to reform behaviour forcibly through mechanical means that would wrest sanitary decision-making from the people, and centralize sanitary control in the government.
The Municipality allocated funds for sewerage, renowned British engineer Baldwin Latham prepared plans and estimates, and construction was completed in 1893. Although the sewers were laid in the part of Ahmedabad that had objected to it the most, they won over the public once they were installed and soon inhabitants were demanding house connections to it. In 1897, the system was extended in response to public demand, and by 1930 the entire area within the old city walls was sewered. Chhotalal’s biographer attributed the public’s radical change in attitude to its encounter with empirical proof of sewerage’s effectiveness.
Ahmedabadis accepted sewerage not just because it was effective and successful sanitation-wise, but because it proved to be effective and successful in preserving social and political structures. Sewerage did not challenge caste divisions as the people had feared, but became a new means of enforcing them. Municipal Collusion Sewerage shifted financial control of the Bhangis away from private citizens onto the Municipality, but the plight of the Bhangis changed little and in certain ways, for the worse.
The Municipality had been moving towards financial control of the Bhangis even before the sewers were built. In 1884, Bhangis were expected to depose the night-soil they collected into municipal tramway carts at the Jamalpur and Shahpur gates for transportation to a manure processing depot two and a half miles away.38 Centralizing faecal collection under the guise of making sanitation more efficient and less laborious enabled the government to impinge upon the Bhangis’s prerogative over night-soil sales. Sewerage completed the Municipality’s takeover.
Chhotalal planned for the faeces collected by sewers to “yield a handsome revenue to the Municipality”, leaving Bhangis no source of alternative income. Although sewers reduced the number of dry latrines, cesspools and open gutters in Ahmedabad, they also generated a new task: clearing out blocked pipes. When it came to hiring sewermen, the Municipality colluded with the caste assumption that Bhangis “deal in the refuse of other humans and that they are all culturally dysfunctional”. It recruited only Bhangis into the sanitation department, refused to hire them in any other department, and left them with few Tam 13 other options for livelihood.
With the decline of private employers, Bhangis had no choice but to become Municipal employees and to submit to Municipal work conditions. While private employment gave Bhangis the power to negotiate wages and work conditions with individual households, public employment wrapped those who were responsible for work conditions in layers of inaccessible bureaucracy. An official noted a similar situation in Delhi, where “the question regarding ‘prospects’ is not understood” since Bhangis became perpetual menial labourers once they joined the Municipality. They no longer had the independence to select where and for whom they worked, nor could they draw upon night-soil sales to buy them time to be selective about employment opportunities. The Bhangis had become completely financially dependent upon the Municipality, and the Municipality used it to its advantage.

Comments

TRENDING

Sorry state of Indian academics: why was I thrown out of Delhi varsity interview room?

By Dr. Abhay Kumar*  The interview for the post of political science (Guest) was scheduled on Saturday afternoon, September 10, 2022. Given my previous experience, I was not willing to appear for it. But friends persuaded me to go and fight for our rights. I reached the college well before the time. When my turn came and I entered the room. The first question was asked about my experience. I said that I had taught for four semesters at NCWEB. I mentioned that I had taught ”Comparative politics”, “International Relations”, “Comparative Political Thoughts” and “Indian Government and Politics”. I said that as a teacher I had taught all the articles listed in the syllabus of the same Delhi University and the expert could ask anything about any reading or ideas. Friends, the first question asked by a female member, perhaps she is the principal of the college if I am not wrong, to give the full form of NCWEB! The second question asked by a male expert, perhaps he is the political science dep

Musician and follower of Dr Ambedkar? A top voilinist has this rare combination!

Some time back, a human rights defender, Vidya Bhushan Rawat, who frequently writes for Counterview, forwarded to me a video interview with Guru Prabhakar Dhakade, calling him one of India's well known violinists.  Dhakade is based in Nagpur and has devoted his life for the Hindustani classical music. A number of his disciples have now been part of Hindi cinema world in Mumbai, says Rawat. He has performed live in various parts of the country as well as abroad. What however attracted me was Dhakade's assertions in video about Dr BR Ambedkar, India's undisputed Dalit icon. Recorded several years back at his residence and music school in Nagpur, Dhakade not only speaks candidly about issues he faced, but that he is a believer in Dr Ambedkar's philosophy. It is in this context that Dhakade narrates his problems, even as stating that he is determined to achieve his goal. A violinist and a follower of Ambedkar? This was new to me. Rarely do musicians are found to take a

Tokens, symbols or incipient feminists? : First generation women sociologists in India

By IMPRI Team  The online event on the theme ‘Tokens, Symbols or Incipient Feminists? : The first Generation of Women Sociologists in India’ was held as an initiative of Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi under the #WebPolicyTalk series of The State of Gender Equality – #GenderGaps. Inaugurating the session, Zubiya Moin welcomed the speaker and participants to the program, followed by an introduction to the eminent panelists. Commencing the program, Prof Vibhuti Patel made her opening remarks welcoming Prof Kamla Ganesh, Feminist Sociologists and then greeted Prof Ratna Naidu and the editors of book ‘Reimaging Sociology in India: Feminist Perspective’, Dr Gita Chadha and Dr. Joseph M.T. along with Prof Arvinder Ansari and also welcomed all participants. She set up the stage by making us familiar with women sociologists and their works. Dr Gita Chadha, Editor of the book ‘Reimaging Sociology in India: Feminist Perspective’ After th

Omission of duty by BSF and police: Hindu forcefully kidnapped, taken to Bangladesh

Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), & National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI) writes to the Chairman, National Human Rights Commission: *** I am writing this to focus on the life and situation of the poor and marginalized villagers living alongside the Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal. Through the several complaints we made throughout the years to your good office, it is now evident that the people of this border are living in an acute crisis, not only from a financial perspective but also in terrible distress. The people of the border are devoid of their basic rights and are subjected to immense torture, harassment and restrictions mostly enacted by the Border Security Force personnel, who are supposed to be posted at the international borders with intentions to protect the Indian citizenry. However, on the contrary, incidents of victimizing Indian citizens are being witnessed at large by the BSF. 130 Bhot

Tamil Nadu govt claiming to reform Hindu religion, temples. People deserve better

By NS Venkataraman  For the last several decades, there have been hate campaign against Hinduism in Tamil Nadu in a subtle or not so subtle manner. Initially, it was a hate campaign against brahmins and the brahmins were abused, insulted and physically attacked. Fearing such conditions, many brahmin families left Tamil Nadu to settle down in other states in India or have gone abroad. Now, the brahmin population in Tamil Nadu is at microscopic level, for which these hate campaigners against brahmins were responsible. Later on, emboldened by the scenario of scared brahmin families not resisting and running away, the hate campaigners started focusing on Hindus. For some years, when M.G.Ramachandran and Jayalalitha were the chief ministers of the state, the hate Hindu campaigners were not much heard, as both these chief ministers were staunch believers in Hindu philosophy and have been offering prayers in temples in full public view. However, in the last eighteen months in

Emerging dimensions of India’s foreign policy in the context of global politics

By IMPRI Team  The three-day course took place recently, providing participants with an understanding of the development of Indian foreign policy, the complexity of geopolitics, and its flexibility to adjust to and even shape global outcomes. Many distinguished academics, senior scholars, former Indian diplomats, and journalists who are skilled observers and commentators of India’s foreign policy will serve as instructors for this course. Day 1 The three-day immersive online certificate training on “Emerging Dimensions of India’s Foreign Policy and Global Politics”, an initiative by the Center for International Relations and Strategic Studies (CIRSS) at IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute (IMPRI), began on July 14th, 2022 at 5:00 PM (IST) on Zoom platform. Dr Souravie Ghimiray served as the emcee throughout the 3 days of the event and welcomed the distinguished speakers of Day 1. The esteemed panel on Day 1 consisted of, Dr Soumita Basu, Associate Professor, Department of Intern

Demographic parameters of India@75: resource allocation, political representation

By IMPRI Team  As per UN Population Prospects 2022, India is going to be the most populous country in the world. In this regard, IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi with #IMPRI Center for Human Dignity and Development (CHDD) , organized a panel discussion, #WebPolicyTalk, as part of the series The State of Population Development- #PopulationAnd Development on India@75: Most Populous Country? The moderator of the event was Mr Devender Singh, Global Studies Programme, University of Freiburg and a Visiting Senior Fellow at IMPRI. The panellists for the event were Prof P.M Kulkarni, Demographer, Retired Professor of Population Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University(JNU) , New Delhi; Dr U.V Somayajulu, Co-Founder, CEO and Executive Director, Sigma Research and Consulting ; Dr Sonia George, General Secretary, Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA), Kerala; Prof K.S James, Director and Senior Professor, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai. Th

Bhagawat Gita shows the way for the attitude to life and desirable goal of life

By NS Venkataraman*  When a mother delivers a human body, this body has no identity. Then, parents, relatives, friends consult each other and discuss the alternate appropriate names and arrive at a suitable name for this human body and this body is known and identified by this name. This human body, which steadily grow just like animals, plants and others and after experiencing the pleasures and pains of worldly life alternately for several years, perish one day, for the body to be burnt or buried. This body, bearing a name as it’s identity, comes in to the world and goes away from the world and the name that is the identity for the body also goes away along with the body. This is the scenario for several thousands of years that have gone by. The question: One question that does not seem to be still “convincingly explained” in a way that will appeal to the brain in the human body, is as to whether this human body only consists of flesh, bone and blood with well

Tattoos and intimidating gestures can't always win cricket matches for India

By Sudhansu R Das  Team India waited with baited breath for the outcome of the Pakistan vs Afghanistan match. Speculation was on about India’s return to the game if Pakistan loses to Afghanistan until Pakistan’s tailender, Naseem hit two massive sixes to win the match for Pakistan. Unfortunately, Afghanistan lost the match after being in a strong position till the last over of the game; two full touch balls in the final over turned the match into Pakistan side. The Afghanistan team would never forget this blunder and shock for a long time. India’s team management should introspect and take tough decision keeping in view of the tough match situation in the world cup matches. India lost two crucial matches in the Asia Cup. It could not defend a big total of 176 against Pakistan due to mediocre bowling attack, sloppy fielding and unimaginative captainship. It failed against Sri Lanka in similar fashion; it could not defend another respectable T 20 total of 171 runs. It was a pat

Not my burden of shame: Malaysia's apathy in tackling problem of sexual harassment

By Jeswan Kaur*  "There was no such thing as child abuse. Parents owned their children. They could do whatever they wanted." -- actress Ellen Burstyn Condemning, judging and humiliating - it this the very nature of people in general or is this what Malaysians are best known for? When a 15-year-old actress recently made a damning revelation that she was molested as a child by her perverted father, support was far from coming. Instead, many name shamed Puteri Nuraaina Balqis, calling her "stupid" and rebuking her for seeking cheap publicity by insulting her father. They "advised" her to pray more, "be thankful to her father for bringing her into this world and remember that she would be given something by Allah for insulting her father." Would any of those who condemned Puteri Balqis "enjoy" being molested, raped or sexually harassed? Would they fancy calling their house a sanctuary when safety was no where in sight? Do these insensitive