Skip to main content

CII water summit: Lack of women's representation reflects patriarchal mindset


Open letter on missing women in the 2020 CII-International Water Innovation Summit “For a Shared Water Future”, addressed to the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the Union Ministry of Jal Shakti and other organizing partners with observations and suggestions from the students of TERI-School of Advanced Studies with a teacher and few others:
***
We learn from https://www.ciihive.in/Login.aspx?EventId=WATERINNOV that, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) in association with Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation is organizing International Water Innovation Summit “For a Shared Water Future” on 15-16 December 2020 over virtual platform. The Summit is also supported by the Partner Country, Canada (?), Platinum Partners ION Exchange & CII-Triveni Institute, and Silver Partners GRUNDFOS & Spray Engineering Devices (SED) Limited. The Summit promises to highlight the crucial link and interdependence of all through its theme ‘for a shared water future’ with thematic sessions to discuss water related challenges and brainstorm feasible solutions in coherence with the hydrological cycle. The Summit aims to promote integrated approach towards sustainable management of water resources. This sounds perfect! The speakers are experts in their own domains. However, looking closer to the summit details one finds that there are some serious issues in such summits that are organized using high resources yet end up less impactful to the ground.
As Master Students of TERI- School of Advanced Studies (deemed to be University) Delhi studying a course on, ‘Water Governance and Institutions’ and as a teacher teaching the course, we have observed a number of concerning issues in the organizing approach of the abovementioned event which requires attention and answer. They are,
  • A country partner Canada is unclear whether that means High Commission of Canada in India or Canada Trade Office or what.
  • The summit is termed international however, we don’t see any representation of speakers of international origin in the panels or any international organization/s including anyone from the Canada based.
  • The summit excludes speakers from several Ministries that are intricately linked to the water sector and to the future of water in the country to name a few, the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Central Ground Water Commission, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Department of Science and Technology, Department of Biotechnology.
  • The summit also excludes the representation of the populace in the summit, i.e., the Youth and the Women. The 17-member panel of speakers including the chief guest, Shri GS Shekhawat (Minister of Jal Shakti, GoI) and special address by Shri Suresh Prabhu (MP and wearing many hats) is comprised of All Men.
In this letter, the focus on part of the number 4 since we find exclusion of the youth and women is serious and linked to what is being learned and shared in the ongoing TERI’s course. Since the summit is about ‘For a Shared Water Future’, involvement of the future generation is deemed crucial especially those who are considered to be adult to be eligible for voting and more so when India is full of bright youth leaders. The world, including United Nations and our own Niti Ayog, too is recognizing the youth power, for example the Time Magazine’s ‘Kid of the Year’ identified is a young girl namely, Gitanjali Rao, from USA (https://time.com/5916772/kid-of-the-year-2020/). How does a summit talk about integration without inclusion of representation of the youth of the country? Still, with a heavy heart we are willing to keep the youth issue aside and instead focus on the equally concerning issue, the exclusion of Women in the Panel of Speakers since, there are several well-established women in the water and the vast and diverse allied sector that needs integration with the water per se.


Here is the Flyer of the summit that is taking rounds pan India that you may be aware of. When we came across it, we felt extremely disturbed and disappointed but at the same time felt encouraged to write this letter directing to the organizing committee and the speakers to highlight the issue besides bring the issue to the notice of the larger concerned populace of the society.
We like to also bring to your notice that the Constitution of India’s Articles 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 39(a), 39(b), 39(c) and 42 with specific importance in this regard grants equality to women and asks the national/state government and other organizations to take cognizance of the gender equity. In addition, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) number 05 that India is a signatory calls to achieve gender equality and empower women & girls. If summits and respectable organizations like the ones organizing the summit must be obliged to respect and attempt the global and country agendas and laws towards gender equity. How does a summit talk about integration without inclusion of representation of half the population of the country?
We like to bring to your notice that India hosts a near gender balanced population (with sex ratio of 108 males per 100 females, as per 2020, Niti Ayog) with equally gender balanced women experts in the vast and diverse water sectors located across the country despite the skewed education graph between men & women. Since the summit will be virtual (otherwise also), inviting some of the women speakers onboard was just a matter of acceptance and accommodation by the organizing committee. Just for example, Ms. Uma Bharati, who was our Union Minister for Drinking Water and Sanitation until last year or Dr. Veena Khanduri who is Coordinator India Water Partnership, could have been invited besides calling a few water scientists pan universities including IITs-IIMs-TISS-TERI, or even some of the water practitioners from the office of the Women’s National Water Resources Council Indian Chamber of the Commerce and Industry (WICCI, https://wicci.in/sector-representative).
Most scientific & policy writings on water around the world are focused on women since women matter is inclusive of children, family and future management. Keeping women out of the discourses in such summits certainly does not lead the society to solve the water woes besides the women woes. As the panel of speakers come from divers and multi-disciplinary background, it is certain that women issues will be used as entry points of some of the panel discussions and then not having the women on board in such discussions may end up hollow talking and promising yet again. It has been noticed that when such events take place in physical, women are found in the roles of front desk, honoring guests, compering sessions, communicators, logistics arrangements, administrative, etc. which is sheer exploiting and humiliating the true potential of the gender balanced water discourse. For example, most of the CII-invites are sent by women incharge. Someone must do these tasks and is okay if women are assigned to do however, it is absolutely not okay to completely exclude participation of women intellectuals.
Needless to elaborate that the utmost issue of lack of women representation reflects once again the seriousness of our patriarchal society and has equally serious repercussions on the future of water issues as can be seen so far that men alone have been extremely challenged in solving the water (worldly) matters.
We have made our points and we rest any further elaboration besides adding few responses below from us. However, we appreciate a response on this matter from the organizing committee as whether it was purposeful to keep women out of the discourse or the issue went unnoticed to the members of the committee. The ‘all men’ summit format is unfortunate and unacceptable to us since, the future of women in the water sector looks grim besides the future of the water itself with this state of the men in the society.
As students & future leaders (both men and women) of the water sector, we wish develop trust and hope in the country’s outlook to gender issues and to a gender balanced approach to guide the future of the water. AS we learn in the course, Water Governance and Institutions, that women have crucial role in the wise use, conservation and management of the water (so as other sectors), the issues will be looked through and by a gender balanced perspective. As a teacher, I wish to provide hope to my students of the diminishing gender inequalities in all spheres with focus on water here, showing them the problems (like this summit) and the processes (like this letter) of working towards Gender Equity.
We do hope that you will take a deep cognizance of the gender issue raised here and undertake necessary amendments to the summit’s organizing besides any similar activities in future. We have prepared a list of the contacts of concerned officials-speakers of the summit to send this email besides the plan to send to the other important organizations in the country.
Should you like to discuss any of the above points or otherwise reach out to us, we are available at the contact mentioned at the beginning and below. Thank you!
Sincerely,
Students of TERI-SAS Course WSG-143 with Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava (00919824092804)
Here are some responses from the signatories of this letter:
  • Gender Equity in the policy, planning and projects must be led from the front from key organizations. Simply put, men have to learn to accommodate for women to be included in key decisions and actions. -- Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava, Ahmedabad
  • The theme of the webinar is “Shared water future”. Is it possible to manage future water resources without women? Are the decisions led by women as a social performativity about food, sanitisation and household management not important for managing water resources. Already due to the ill-conceived development, climate change and increased pollution, water resources are pressurized by the dependency of socio-economic development. Is stability in managing water and its resources expected independent of gender inclusion? – Nidhi Puranik, Nagpur.
  • Equity, equality, liberation, and inclusion serve as the foundation for the establishment of gender balance. Also, if we look at the impacts of climate change, women are seen to be more adaptive and they are also capable of coming up with the mitigation mechanisms to counter the disastrous consequences of climate change. Inclusion of women in the water sector will bring harmony and will also lead to addition of new perspectives to the various aspects of policy and industry. -- Raghav Raja, New Delhi.
  • At a time when women’s voices are rising all around the globe, they should be included in the water panel which decides the future of water. Women are more affected by water issues everywhere. Now it’s about time we stop perceiving women as mere household users of water and start giving them a voice in the high-level talks of the water sector; a much-needed change that will not only improve water sector policies but also be a step towards “a shared water future” which also happens to be the theme of this summit. -- Mayank Prasher, Kangra.
  • The value of the word equality is really questionable, even being in the 21st century, if such a prestigious panel is seen without any female dignitary then it becomes really mundane. Giving room to women in the podium in water or any other sector will not tighten the space but will surely widen the gaze. – Dayadra Mandal, Kolkata.
  • The saddest part is that the Organizations are not willing to accept that they are gender biased and there is no respect to the rules of UN gender policies whatsoever. _Srishti Ramnani, New Delhi.
  • I feel there should be an equal representation of all the genders. Women play a very important role in water management so including them in any sort of discussion will bring in a perspective which is very crucial. — Kasturi Basu, Panipat.
  • It is not possible to address the needs of women without their participation at the front in the water panel. Women have their unique potential to contribute to their families and the community. So, building inclusive governance structures and strengthening the role of women in civil society is very much needed for proper implementation of the policies and betterment of the society. – Sayan Debnath, Kolkata.
  • You preach of gender equality and equity. But in practice you’re all so ignorant. These boards should be called out to provide some explanation to elucidate hypocrisy. I fail to understand how this goes unnoticed by the authorities! Are people not able to check this? Or is it not even a priority? – Manika Saxena, Lucknow.
  • After noticing the gender bias selection of speakers in the flagship event “Water Innovation Summit”, it hurted more to know that most of the key positions in CII, CGWB, National Water Policy Committee, are held by Men only. This reflects a dark present, where policy makers, decision makers seem to forget the role of women in the water industry till now. I believe this definitely will draw attention to why women are still invisible? – Balpreet Kaur, Punjab
  • We, as the interdisciplinary group of students regret the attitude towards the immense ignorance of gender inclusion in the panel for discussion. We would like to know where the women speakers are in this creative and important discussion on water. All that is visible are the clear tacit prejudices, disparities, stereotypical and discriminatory behaviour. Ironically, the multi-national organisations leading the session that are supposed to be creating values and promoting positive interventions, taking holistic and integrated approaches, instead there seems clearer underrepresentation of women in leadership roles and unwelcoming thinking, marginalisation on fundamental grounds and failure to strike gender balance as an ethical and moral requirement. With hope to make people and parties concerned to rethink about the unrecognised and undercompensated efforts by women of this country being politicized and marked by ignorance, we need organisational environments in which both men and women can explore the full range of their individual capacities, nurtures women’s propensity to creativity and innovation and accepts the challenges to a heterogenic and dynamic relationships instead of managing only a homogenous unit. In the shared water future, are the decisions led by women as a social performativity about food, sanitisation and household management not important for managing water resources? Already due to the ill-conceived development, climate change and increased pollution, water resources are pressurized by the dependency of socio-economic development. Is stability in managing water and its resources expected independent of gender inclusion? We expect enabling, visionary and adaptive leadership, broadened viewpoints, fair social practices, more authenticity as a “collaborative change movement.”  A harmonising rational structure that allows for capacity building for integration and respect of human rights is a progressive and peacekeeping solution. When water doesn’t see the difference between genders, why should we? I guess even men will agree that listening to women’s perspective about ‘shared water future’ is as necessary as the very existence of this innovation summit. Let the ‘nari shakti’ too, talk about the ‘jal shakti’. – Manisha, Jaipur
Signatures from others within the given deadline:
Lokendra Balsaria, Ahmedabad
Jatin Seth, Ahmedabad
Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Ahmedabad
Alka Parecha, Ahmedabad
Neena Mirani Raicha, Rajnandgaon
Darshan Desai, Ahmedabad
Dr. Sandeep Pandey, Lucknow
Dev Desai, Ahmedabad
GEV, Sanjay, Indore
Bhavana Ramrakhiani, Ahmedabad
Persis Ginwalla, Ahmedabad
GK Bhatt, Ahmedabad
Dr. V.N. Sharma, Lucknow
Swati Goswami, Ahmedabad
Meenakshi Joshi
Sushila, Ahmedabad
Smita Pandya, Ahmadabad
Beena Jadav , Ahmedabad
Prita Jha, Ahmedabad
Gautami Baviskar, Ahmedabad
Ankita Gupta, Delhi
Suresh Nautiyal, Uttarakhand
Shreekumar, Nakre, Udipi,
WICCI Water Resources Council National and State Representatives:Dr. Bhakti Devi, Bengaluru, President
Dr. Mansee Bal Bhargava, Ahmedabad, Vice President
Radhica Kanniganti, Bengaluru
Dr Nirmala Devi, Assam
Dr. Sarika Kulkarni, Mumbai
Sujaya Rathi, Bengaluru
Sneha Pathak, New Delhi
Vidya Ramesh, Bangalore

Comments

TRENDING

Vishwanath has been unfairly excluded from global list of 100 best cricketers

By Harsh Thakor  Gundappa Vishwanath scaled zones in batting artistry or wizardry unparalleled amongst Indian batsmen. The best of his batting was a manifestation of the divine. He was also the epitome of cricketing sportsmanship. Sadly 40 years ago he unceremoniously bid farewell to the International cricket world, after the concluding test at Karachi in 1982-83., in January end. Very hard to visualise a character like Vishwanath being reborn today His memories are embedded in cricket lovers today when sportsmanship and grace have virtually been relegated to oblivion with the game of cricket turned into a commercial commodity. Today agro and unsporting behaviour is a routine feature Vishy shimmered cricket’s spirituality. His behaviour on the cricket field was grace personified, No one in his age defined cricket more as a gentleman’s game, than Vishy. Vishwanath could execute strokes that were surreal with his steel wrists. His strokeplay resembled the touches of a painter’s brush,

Abrogation of Art 370: Increasing alienation, relentless repression, simmering conflict

One year after the abrogation by the Central Government of Art. 370 in Kashmir, what is the situation in the Valley. Have the promises of peace, normalcy and development been realised? What is the current status in the Valley? Here is a detailed note by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties , “Jammu & Kashmir: One Year after Abrogation of Art. 370: Increasing Alienation, Relentless Repression, Simmering Conflict”:

Reproductive, conjugal rights of women in India amidst debate of uniform civil code

By IMPRI Team  A Three-Day Immersive Online Legal Awareness and Certificate Training Course on “Reproductive and Conjugal Rights of Women in India” is an initiative of the Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC), at the IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, and ran for three consecutive days starting from December 22, 2022 to December 24, 2022. The online paid certification was aimed to provide attendees with an enriching experience on the gender discourse with a special focus on women’s rights and the much-discussed reproductive rights in India.

Covid jabs: Pretexts cited to justify young, healthy succumbing to heart attacks

By Jay Ihsan   Truth is stranger than fiction – when dedicated doctors raised the red flag against the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, they were persecuted and their concerns barred from being heard. These honest doctors unequivocally made it known the Moderna Pfizer vaccines injure the heart and human body. One of them, Dr Peter McCullough, an American cardiologist, has repeatedly issued the clarion call to people to reject these harmful vaccines. An equally alarmed World Council for Health said the harmful Covid-19 vaccines should be removed from the market and the global inoculation must be stopped. “In Japan the vaccines were not mandated or made compulsory. The vaccines are not safe or effective enough to mandate them. The day the vaccines go away will be a day of celebration,” Dr Mccullough had lamented during an interview with India’s media outfit, Qvive several months ago. Meanwhile, the number of people jabbed with the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines died soon after or have developed lifelong

Gender gap 17%, SC and ST levels of education between 7% to 14% below upper classes

By IMPRI Team  The treatment of school education in a holistic manner and improving school effectiveness in terms of equal opportunities for schooling and learning outcomes has been the aspiration of all and multiple challenges are faced to maintain and provide proper education. On the occasion of India@75: Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, as part of its series- the State of Education- #EducationDialogue, #IMPRI Center for ICT for Development (CICTD), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi organised a special deliberation on The State of School Education In India with Prof Muchkund Dubey, who is the President of the Council for Social Development, New Delhi. The moderator for the event, Dr Simi Mehta CEO and Editorial Director of the IMPRI. The chair of the event was Prof Jandhyala B.G. Tilak, an Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) National Fellow, the Distinguished Professor at the Council for Social Development, New Delhi and also a Former Professor & Vice-Ch

Rahul Dravid exhibited selflessness in heights unscaled by any other Indian batsman

By Harsh Thakor*  On January 11th maestro Rahul Dravid turned 50. No Indian batsmen were ever more of an embodiment of temperament or grit.as Rahul Dravid. Dravid was the best ambassador of sportsmanship in cricket in his day and age. In his time no Asian batsmen did what the doctor ordered, to the extent of Dravid. Dravid was manifestation of single-mindedess, tenacity and selflessness in sport. One hardly has an adjective to the ice coolness and craft Dravid exhibited in adjusting to the given situation. Rarely did any batsmen exhibit such a clinical o methodical approach to batting.

Data analytics: How scientific enquiry process impacts quality of policy research

By IMPRI Team  Given the multidimensionality of policy and impact research, tech-driven policy prescriptions are playing a dominant role in the 21st century. As such, data analytics have become integral in this space. IMPRI Generation Alpha Data Centre (GenAlphaDC) , IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute New Delhi has successfully conducted a #WebPolicyTalk 6-Week Immersive Online Hands-on Certificate Training Course on Data Analytics for Policy Research, spanning over 6-consecutive Saturdays from October 15th to November 19th, 2022. Along with this, datasets for hands-on learning were also provided for data analysis and learning. Participants were required to make a submission for evaluation at the end of the course, to obtain the certificate. This course comprised hands-on data learning sessions and various expert sessions on data discourses. The course especially catered to data and policy enthusiasts – including students, professionals, researchers, and other individuals lo

NHRC blindly followed BSF status report on fencing farmland off Indo-Bangladesh border

Kirity Roy, Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM) writes an open letter of protest against the action taken status report on restriction imposed by the BSF personnel upon the villagers of Changmari near Indo-Bangladesh border: *** I have the honour to inform you that we received one action taken status report dated 11.01.2023 from your Commission in respect of the above referred case from where it is revealed that your authority closed the case based on the report of the concerned authorities. In this connection I again raise my voice as the enquiry in respect of the above referred case was not properly conducted. Hence I submit this open letter of protest for the ends of justice. From the action taken status report of the Commission dated 11.01.2023 it is reported that concerned authority submitted a report dated 18.01.2022 where it is reported that the concerned area comes under the OPS responsibility of BOP Chengmari, 62 Bn BSF and is highly susceptible to trans-bo

Great march of migrants during lockdown: Lessons not learned, missed opportunities

By IMPRI Team  A panel discussion on “The Great March of Migrants During The National Lockdown: Lessons Not Learned and Missed Opportunities” was organized by the #IMPRI Center for Human Centre for Human Dignity and Development (CHDD), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi on the occasion of International Migrants Day, i.e December 18, 2022. Inaugurating the session, Ms Aanchal Kumari, a researcher at IMPRI, welcomed the speakers and participants to the program with an introduction to the eminent panellists. The event was moderated by Dr Devender Singh, a Visiting Senior Fellow at IMPRI. The panellists included Prof. R.B Bhagat, Professor and Head, Department of Migration and Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai; Prof Arun Kumar, Distinguished Economist, a Former Professor Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi and Malcolm S. Adiseshiah Chair Professor, Institute of Social Sciences, New Delhi; Ms Akriti Bhatia, Founder of People

Brutal assault on Delhi Univ students as fear grips present rulers on rise of dissent

By Arhaan Baaghi  Various democratic student organizations (bsCEM, fraternity, DSU, SIO, AIRSO) had planned a screening of the BBC documentary "India: The Modi Question" in the Delhi University Arts Faculty, but the guards of the university and the Delhi police along with paramilitary forcefully detained the students just because we were trying to watch a documentary that scrutinizes the role of Modi in 2002 Gujarat riots. At first when the students started screening the documentary, the electricity of the department building was cut down. Students were brutally beaten by the police and university guards. Female students were also brutally manhandled and beaten. This whole incident shows the Brahmanical Hindutva fascist nature of the government and the university authority that is working as its puppet. An activist of bsCEM was manhandled by a male security guard, who tried to pull out his T shirt. Also various female activist were dragged by male security guards and their h