Skip to main content

Gandhi as true democrat made truth, non-violence effective weapons of mass struggle

By Rishi Shrivastava* 

Gandhi had various self-realisation phases in his life. In South Africa, when he was working as a barrister, he fought for the rights of the Indian people. Gandhi’s critics argued that he had a racist view of the Africans because Gandhi represented Indian civilisation as superior to the African civilisation. This tendency of Gandhi characterises his image as an undemocratic racist leader. Nevertheless, after returning to India, Gandhi adopted a lifestyle like an ordinary Indian villager, he changed his view on various aspects, including religion and culture.
Gandhi began his political career in India by launching Champaran Satyagrah, where he supported peasants' demands. His later movements include a myriad of people from different classes and religions. Gandhi was very strict in his ways and never left his path of non-violence. Even the brutal crackdown of the British government on protestors did not make Gandhi leave his trace.
The apathy of the government towards the degrading conditions of Indians made the extremist faction of revolutionary unsatisfactory. The British government often deceived India’s demand for dominion status, which made extremist factions launch more violent attacks to raise their voice and demands. Gandhi never supported the extreme ways to boost his demands; he always made his way by adopting Satyagraha and including the masses in it.
Gandhi was also criticised for his authoritarian tendencies. In 1919, after the Jallianwala Bagh incident and Rowlatt Act, Gandhi launched the Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM), which had shown its impact significantly everywhere in India. People were supporting it by every means. Massive non-cooperation towards the British caused the administrative and economic system to be scattered. Every section of the society supported Gandhi. On 4 February 1922, the incident of Chauri Chaura occurred in which the mob killed 22 police officers by setting fire to the police station. The incident distressed Gandhi significantly that he decided to withdraw the whole movement overnight in a single stroke. This decision of Gandhi came with various criticisms within and outside the Congress; it was viewed as it is not appropriate for a mass leader to show this kind of authoritarian tendency. Earlier in South Africa, Gandhi also had shown this type of attitude. The withdrawal of the NCM, which was going in its full swing, demoralised the people and leaders. C.R Das, Sardar Patel, and Pandit Nehru recommended that Gandhi to change his decision because a few people’s violent acts would lead the nation to suffer. However, Gandhi, on the other hand, Gandhi was firmly committed to his decision. The Non-Violent principle for which Gandhi was known would not get so much encouragement contemporarily if Gandhi had decided to go away with it. Another factor in withdrawing from the movement was that Gandhi had feared that now the government had got the chance to suppress the movement violently. It is better to call it off to prevent the upcoming chaos.
The boycotting of the British goods and institutions could not be sustained for a more extended period as there were no alternatives available for the Indians. The courts, colleges, schools, and offices were resumed as boycotting them for a long time could lead to an existential crisis for the middle-class. Gandhi had asked the people to boycott the foreign-made clothes and adopt Indian khadi as they were causing the wealth to drain from India, flourishing Britain and was ultimately a symbol of the foreign dependency.
Nevertheless, the boycotting of foreign clothes was not a feasible option because Khadi was expensive compared to synthetic foreign clothes. Gandhi’s principle was to make Indians aware of the real meaning of independence. Gandhi’s strategy of struggle-truce-struggle states that a truce is crucial because it will give people time to regroup and make strategies against the repressive state.
Truth and non-violence were his most effective weapons of Gandhi, and he used them to convert people’s aspirations into mass struggles. These are the traits of any democratic leader who takes everyone along. These were the characteristics of the Gandhian movements that everyone from India joined. By virtue of Gandhian philosophy, India managed to get freedom from such a long struggle.
The Poona pact of 1932 between B.R Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi was signed due to Ambedkar’s demand for the reservations for depressed classes in electoral seats in the legislature of the British Indian government. The pact morally affected depressed classes as they could now represent themselves politically. The effort for the upliftment of the depressed class was a significant event as now the support of the depressed class for Gandhi increased remarkably.
This was the charismatic leadership of Gandhi that, due to his ideas, the people of India felt united. On the issue of language, Hindus and Muslims were struggling regarding the dominance of their language. Gandhi sees this as an opportunity to unite them from the linguistic perspective. He gave the idea for the “Hindustani” language, a composition of different languages. In his speeches and interactions, Gandhi referred to his language as Hindustani. However, the notion of uniting people through the scope of a language was vastly a complex challenge because of the varieties of languages found in India. He viewed that having a common language would strengthen the nation’s spirit to fight against foreign rule.
Gandhi and his disciplines made him a true democratic leader; the masses believed in his idea for India, where everyone would get representation and rights. It was the speciality of Gandhi that he found the mid-way as the solution for any problem. Gandhi changed his demands according to the need for time. He made an understanding between Hindus, Muslim Dalits, peasants, and industrialists and found a common way to fight against British rule, making him the true democratic leader. Gandhi’s philosophy and working style put him at the epitome of democratic leaders. His honesty with himself made it possible to achieve independence by experimenting with a non-violent policy which led to success and laid India’s foundations.
---
*Sophomore in Global Studies at Ambedkar University, Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.

Implications of deaths of Maoist leaders G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya in Chhattisgarh

By Harsh Thakor*  In the wake of recent security operations in southern Chhattisgarh, two senior Maoist leaders, G. Renuka and Ankeshwarapu Sarayya, were killed. These operations, which took place amidst a historically significant Maoist presence, resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals on March 20th and 16 more three days prior.