Skip to main content

Unpacking yellow journalism in Bangladesh: Big tycoons, big lies

By Hasan Ibne Hamid* 

As the National Election is approaching, the political climate in Bangladesh is rapidly changing with political heatwaves and social turmoil. Internally, pro BNP-Jammat civil society groups are fanning flames over media to tarnish the political horizon of Bangladesh. Whilst, externally, some major external players have launched their smear campaign to manipulate the public opinion and upcoming election results. However, there is another interoperable force, namely, the “Yellow Media” ‒ lying at the critical juncture between internal and external forces ‒ which are propagating, fabricating, and spreading misinformation, disinformation and false narratives to secure its vested political interests and financial objectives. In this regard, time and again, the names of the big media tycoons namely, The Daily Star and Prothom Alo ‒ are popping up as the precursor of the “yellow journalism” in Bangladesh. Recently, these vested media houses are corroborating as the spokesman of the foreign intelligence services ahead of the upcoming election to tarnish the political image of the Bangladesh government.
For instance, on December 6, 2022, The Daily Star, on its first page, published a “ill-motivated” report titled “Probe S. Alam Group assets, PM orders amid allegation of over evaluation of land”. The report entails that Bangladeshi Premier Sheikh Hasina has called for an investigation into the affairs of S. Alam Group, which has been in the public discourse in recent times for its alleged excessive borrowing from the banking system in violation of rules. The report also said that Dr. Ahmed Kaykaus, the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, has given instructions to the Deputy Commissioner of Chittagong Mohammad Mominur Rahman in this regard. However, according to the sources of the Prime Minister’s Office, both of the referral persons – Principal Secretary Dr. Ahmed Kaykaus and Chittagong Deputy Commissioner (DC) Mohammad Mominur Rahman - expressed their utter despair that such false news was not expected from a cerebral newspaper like the Daily Star. After unpacking the truth, the media outlet itself admitted their mistake in a statement after the response of the Prime Minister’s office and in this case their comment is, “We stand corrected”.
Anam’s politics of “we stand corrected” is nothing new in Bangladesh’s political arena. Along with Prothom Alo and the CPD, Daily Star was an alleged mastermind in creating the pretext to promote an unconstitutional military-backed caretaker government in 2007 in the disguise of `depoliticization’ campaign. At that time, these outlets created the path of arresting political leaders by circulating propaganda under the direct prescription from the then DGFI officials. In 2013, Prothom Alo and Daily Star, the two leading dailies in Bangladesh, were also alleged to make controversies against the `Ganajagoron Moncho’, an activist platform to demonstrate on the demand of prosecuting the war criminals in the 1971 Liberation War. While the Daily Amar Desh, the mouthpiece of anti-liberation forces, published a propaganda news after the conviction of Delowar Hossain Sayeedi to provoke communal violence, the consequence of the news was intensively awful. It resulted in vandalization of roads, transports, offices and killing hundreds of people in political violence. Mahmudur Rahman, the then editor of Amar Desh was charged for spreading false news. Interestingly, however, the Prothom Alo Editor Matiur Rahman and the Daily Star editor Mahfuz Anam signed in a joint statement demanding his quick release. Not alone in the case of Mahmudur Rahman, they also signed a statement demanding the release of “Adhikar” editor Adilur Rahman, who was arrested for publishing false report on the death toll in the police operation to pacify the mass gathering of Hefazat-e-Islam on May 5-6, 2013 in Motijheel, Dhaka. As evidence shows later on, many people were found alive in their homes, who were enlisted as “dead” in the report.
Even, after failing to establish a pro-western puppet regime in the national election 2014, the media outlet overwhelmingly stood in favor of the West. While Dan Mozena, the erstwhile US Ambassador, gave a speech in support of the right-wing elements of the BNP-Jamaat-Hefazat axis, flouting all diplomatic etiquette, the then Awami League General Secretary, Syed Ashraf, made a statement criticizing Dan Mozena’s statement. However, in counter-reaction, Mahfuz Anam wrote an editorial in the Daily Star to teach him decency and criticized the government’s zero tolerance policy against militancy and boycotted the anti-militancy round table discussions! More pathetically, in 2015, Mahfuz Anam compared the political crisis of Bangladesh to the ethnic problems of Rwanda's Tutsi and Hutu in his editorial to implement and propagate the US policy in Bangladesh by discounting one of the bloodiest histories of human civilization, where the notorious Rwandan genocide witnessed a massacre of eight million people in just 100 days!
The latest addition to the saga of the Daily Star’s “yellow journalism” is manifested on December 08, 2022, when the outlet published a blatantly partisan editorial regarding the political violence on the BNP rally in Dhaka’s Nayapaltan. In the editorial, Mahfuz Anam referred to the death of a “BNP activist”, although the Daily Star did not independently verify that the deceased was a member of the BNP. Later it was revealed that a common citizen died in a cocktail explosion by BNP activists. But how he died will be clear after getting the postmortem report. In other words, the trend of propagating the people through fabrication and manipulation of the news has become a part and parcel of the Daily Star’s yellow journalism.
The history of the Daily Star’s controversial journalistic practices is nothing new. Yet, the question is remains, how long it would continue such yellow journalistic instances. Despite repeated apologies and admissions of mistakes, the Daily Star’s misrepresentation of rumors and lies in the name of journalism has not stopped. Because, these vested groups lie in the critical juncture between the domestic hostile actors and foreign intelligence agencies. Tasneem Khalil, former journalist of the newspaper, has admitted this fact in multiple media previously. Thus, the report published in the Daily Star on December 6 is just a trailer, perhaps, we have to see a lot more in the future!
---
*Political and International Affairs Analyst

Comments

TRENDING

हिंदी आलोचना जैसे पिछड़ चुके अनुशासन की जगह हिंदी वैचारिकी का विकास जरूरी

- प्रमोद रंजन*   भारतीय राजनीति में सांप्रदायिक व प्रतिक्रियावादी ताकतों को सत्ता तक पहुंचाने में हिंदी पट्टी का सबसे बड़ा योगदान है। इसका मुख्य कारण हिंदी-पट्टी में कार्यरत समाजवादी व जनपक्षधर हिरावल दस्ते का विचारहीन, अनैतिक और  प्रतिक्रियावादी होते जाना है। अगर हम उपरोक्त बातों को स्वीकार करते हैं, तो कुछ रोचक निष्कर्ष निकलते हैं। हिंदी-जनता और उसके हिरावल दस्ते को विचारहीन और प्रतिक्रियावादी बनने से रोकने की मुख्य ज़िम्मेदारी किसकी थी?

साहित्य बोध में परिवर्तन: सत्तर के दशक में विचारधारा का महत्व बहुत अधिक था

- अजय तिवारी   सत्तर के बाद वाले दशक में जब हम लोग साहित्य में प्रवेश कर रहे थे तब दाढ़ी रखने, बेतरतीबी से कपड़े पहनने और फक्कड़पन का जीवन जीने वाले लोग बेहतर लेखक हुआ करते थे या बेहतर समझे जाते थे। नयी सदी में चिकने-चुपड़े, बने-ठने और खर्चीला जीवन बिताने वाले सम्मान के हक़दार हो चले हैं। यह फ़र्क़ जनवादी उभार और भूमण्डलीय उदारीकरण के बीच का सांस्कृतिक अंतर उजागर करता है। 

How Mahakavi Sri Sri defined political and cultural metamorphosis of Telugu society

By Harsh Thakor  Srirangam Srinivasarao, popularly known as Sri Sri, or called Mahakavi (The Great Poet), held a reputation like no other Telugu poet. Today, on June 15th, we commemorate his 40th death anniversary. Sri Sri transcended heights in revolutionary creativity or exploration, unparalleled, in Telegu poetry, giving it a new dimension. His poems projected the theme or plight of the oppressed people at a scale, rarely penetrated by poets, giving revolutionary poetry it’s soul.

Laxmanpur Bathe massacre: Perfect example of proto-fascist Brahmanical social order

By Harsh Thakor  The massacre at Laxmanpur-Bathe of Jehanabad in Bihar on the night of 1 December in 1997 was a landmark event with distinguishing features .The genocide rightly shook the conscience of the nation in the 50th year of Indian independence. The scale of the carnage was unparalleled in any caste massacre. It was a perfect manifestation of how in essence the so called neo-liberal state was in essence most autocratic. 

एनडीए सरकार में हिन्दू राष्ट्रवाद की दिशा: मुसलमानों का हाशियाकरण जारी रहेगा

- राम पुनियानी*  लोकसभा आमचुनाव में भाजपा के 272 सीटें हासिल करने में विफल रहने के बाद एनडीए एक बार फिर नेपथ्य से मंच के केंद्र में आ गया है. सन 1998 में अटलबिहारी वाजपेई एनडीए सरकार के प्रधानमंत्री बने थे. उस सरकार के कार्यकलापों पर भी भाजपा की राजनीति का ठप्पा था. उस सरकार ने हिंदुत्व के एजेंडे के अनुरूप संविधान की समीक्षा के लिए वेंकटचलैया आयोग नियुक्त किया, पाठ्यपुस्तकों का भगवाकरण किया और ज्योतिषशास्त्र व पौरोहित्य को विषय के रूप में पाठ्यक्रम में जोड़ा. सन 2014 और 2019 में बनी मोदी सरकारें तकनीकी दृष्टि से भले ही एनडीए की सरकारें रही हों मगर चूँकि भाजपा को अपने दम पर बहुमत हासिल था इसलिए अन्य घटक दल साइलेंट मोड में बने रहे और भाजपा ने बिना रोकटोक अपना आक्रामक हिन्दू राष्ट्रवादी एजेंडा लागू किया. इसमें शामिल था राममंदिर का निर्माण और अनुच्छेद 370 का कश्मीर से हटाया जाना. इसके अलावा सरकार की मौन सहमति से गाय और बीफ के नाम पर मुसलमानों की लिंचिंग की गयी और लव जिहाद और न जाने कितने अन्य किस्मों के जिहादों की बातें की गईं.

सदन की सबसे उंची गद्दी पर बैठे यह शख्स मर्यादाओं को अनदेखा कर मुंह फेरता रहा

- मनीष सिंह*   ओम बिड़ला को जब याद किया जाएगा, तो लोगों के जेहन मे भावहीन सूरत उभरेगी। सदन के सबसे उंची गद्दी पर बैठा शख्स, जो संसदीय मर्यादाओं को तार तार होते सदन मे अनजान बनकर  मुंह फेरता रहा।  मावलंकर, आयंगर, सोमनाथ चटर्जी और रवि राय ने जिस कुर्सी की शोभा बढाई, उसे उंचा मयार दिया.. वहीं ओम बिड़ला इस सदन की गरिमा की रक्षा मे अक्षम स्पीकर के रूप मे याद किये जाऐंगे। 

नरेन्द्र मोदी देवत्व की ओर? 1923 में हिटलर ने अपनी तुलना भी ईसा मसीह से की थी

- राम पुनियानी*  समाज के संचालन की प्रजातान्त्रिक प्रणाली को मानव जाति ने एक लम्बे और कठिन संघर्ष के बाद हासिल किया. प्रजातंत्र के आगाज़ के पूर्व के समाजों में राजशाही थी. राजशाही में राजा-सामंतों और पुरोहित वर्ग का गठबंधन हुआ करता था. पुरोहित वर्ग, धर्म की ताकत का प्रतिनिधित्व करता था. राजा को ईश्वर का प्रतिरूप बताया जाता था और उसकी कथनी-करनी को पुरोहित वर्ग हमेशा उचित, न्यायपूर्ण और सही ठहराता था. पुरोहित वर्ग ने बड़ी चतुराई से स्वर्ग (हैवन, जन्नत) और नर्क (हैल, जहन्नुम) के मिथक रचे. राजा-पुरोहित कॉम्बो के आदेशों को सिर-आँखों पर रखने वाला पुण्य (सबाब) करता है और इससे उसे पॉजिटिव पॉइंट मिलते हैं. दूसरी ओर, जो इनके आदेशों का उल्लंघन करता है वह पाप (गुनाह) करता है और उसे नेगेटिव पॉइंट मिलते हैं. व्यक्ति की मृत्यु के बाद नेगेटिव और पॉजिटिव पॉइंटों को जोड़ कर यह तय किया जाता है कि वह नर्क में सड़ेगा या स्वर्ग में आनंद करेगा.