Skip to main content

Fighting hunger with vaccine mandate? Realities of Left resurgence in Brazil

By Dr Gautam Das* 

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. He is popularly known as Lula. His political future was hanging in balance in the last run-off presidential election held just three months ago. He bagged 50.9% of total vote while his closet rival Jair Bolsonaro got 49.1%. Millions of people took to the street alleging unfair means of counting. These people were voicing their unhappiness and discontent over the election results. The Corporate media as well as the leftist commentators summarily dismissed them as right wing supporters of Bolsonaro. [1] [2] [3] [4] [27]
Curiously, Joe Biden as the head of the most powerful state expressed unflinching faith in Lula. He congratulated him saying that Lula won in a free, fair and credible election and both the countries shared the experience of surviving right wing attack on democracy. [5] ‘The leftist former president’s win marks an extra-ordinary comeback……cementing Latin America’s shift to the left’, said the Wall Street Journal. [6] Time magazine went one step ahead by depicting Lula’s victory as a win for the planet. [7] Keeping aside the lofty praises showered by Indian left and liberal commentators, the reaction of Indian corporate media is worth mentioning. ‘Lula wins Brazil Election in political Resurrection for leftist’ screamed the headline of The Economic Times. [8] ‘Biden insisted through the CIA, state department, and defense department that support for a coup would not be forthcoming.’ said The Guardian. [9] Most pedagogical and bizarre observation was made by a mouthpiece of an Indian ultra-left parliamentary party. They said, ‘The imperialist countries have also welcomed the result of election. This does not reflect any shift in their policies though, it is just an attempt to bring some socio-political stability to Brazil which was on the verge of chaos during Bolsonaro government.’ [10]
Beginning his journey spanning over last 50 years as a mass leader and metal factory worker of Sao-Palo, he underwent many rises and falls and finally came back to presidential post for third time. After the latest victory, he flung his clenched fist towards the sky, saying ‘Brazil is back,’ ….(we will)work tirelessly for a Brazil where love prevails over hate, truth over lies, and hope is bigger than fear.’ Once this 77 years old veteran leader mesmerized the millions of his country with his passionate and fiery speech. In the early eighties, he led mass movements in order to overthrow the US-backed military junta. The irony of history is that the head of the country that had propped up the “right wing fascist regime” is now eulogizing Lula’s latest electoral win as a victory of democracy over right wing hooliganism. During his on-going US tour, his smooth talking has won the hearts of US administration and big corporate media so much so that they are celebrating Lula’s remark and finding them enchanting more than ever before. He will have conversation with radical lefts. So has been reported in main stream media. He is scheduled to have great talk with Biden and Barnie Sanders on Amazon Fund.
Is it a reality that big Corporate Capital, Democracy and Equality are aligning to ensure a more democratic and greener world? Is there more to this optics and theatrics than meets the eye? Or is it just another illusory thought that has eluded us decades after decades?
Lula is now a more mature and shrewd leader. He appears to have no ideological illusion. Had it been so, it could have never been possible for him to achieve his political resurrection. He is well aware of what the billionaire magnets of Wall Street loves to hear. [11]
In the electoral campaign, the main allegation Lula levelled against his arch rival was that president Bolsonaro had got Brazil isolated from rest of the world. He ostensibly meant to say that the incumbent discouraged the foreign capitalists to come to Brazil. So he gave subtle indications that if he comes to power, international finance capital will have unfettered access and. the state-run oil agency Petrobus and Employees provident Fund will join biggest bankers in Amazon Mining Project. Immediatly after Lula’s win, Financial Times wrote, ‘Lula’s victory in Brazil’s presidential election will unlock a flood of money from international investors who shunned the country under Jair Bolsonaro because of his terrible environmental record. [12]
The environmentalists often called Mr. Bolsonaro the jungle eater. He was aiding and abetting the crime of local miners, wood mafias, loogers, agriculturists and pastoralists who have encroached the Amazon forest and were causing deforestation by exploiting the resources, undertaking expansive cultivation and ranching. That was the main plank of Lula’s election campaign. The corporate media in sync with US administration has largely endorsed Lula’s accusation and mostly echoed his rants. Lula promised that he would reach zero deforestation goal by 2030 and hunt down the illegal encroachers by launching a military style campaign. After his comeback with a hair thin margin, he has indeed started the belligerent campaign. [13] The most uncomfortable and stark truth on which Lula has cleverly remained silent is the fact that the eight major mining companies that have been causing enormous destruction in Amazon forest by mining explorations include Vale, Anglo-American, Belo-sun, Rio-Tinto & Anglo-Gold- to name a few who have atrocious records of human rights violation. US based international financers e.g, Capital group, Black Rock and Vanguard invested 54 billion in these mining companies. Needless to say that these powerful corporations are the main players of Wall street and constitute a formidable force behind World Economic Forum because they invest the money of all super rich billionaires of the world. Among the other investors are Banco da Brasil, Credit Agricole of France, Germany’s Commerzbank, Citigroup and Bank of America and SMBC of Japan. [14] All these facts were brought to the fore by Amazon Watch and AIPB, the organization of Indigenous people living in Amazon area. AIPB has generously lent their support to Lula in his electoral fight and they demanded that a separate ministry for indigenous people be formed. [15] After initial prevarication Lula has conceded to form the ministry under the leadership of firebrand leader Sonia Guajajara. It remains to be seen whether Ms Guajajara’s avowed stance against the mining giants and their powerful financiers will reach logical conclusion or end up with shady corporate social responsibilities.
Lula is now holding meeting with Biden and Bernie Sanders on how America can pour more money in Amazon Fund. 1.4 billion US$ worth Amazon fund was created ostensibly to fight deforestation and green house gas emission from degradation. The covert goal is to strengthen the network of information and surveillance technology all over the Amazon area and drive out the local mafias, miners, loogers, indigenous agriculturists and cattle ranchers to turn this world’s largest rain forest into a sanctuary of infamous mining giants. Their real intent is evident from their own observation that “Expansive, low-productivity cattle-raising is the main cause of Amazon deforestation. Data provided by TerraClass Project showed that in 2008 around 62% 6 of the deforested areas in Brazilian Amazon were occupied with pasture.” [16]
Apart from Amazon issue, the second biggest bet Mr. Lula played in his election campaign was his promise to make vaccine mandatory for direct cash transfer govt. scheme called Bolso Familia. The Guardian quoted him saying, ‘Vaccines aren’t about whether you have the money or not,’…They’re about whether you love life or love death.’ [17]
The position taken by Bolsonaro was poles apart. He was sceptical of Covid and vaccine against it. He said that he would be the last person to get Covid vaccine. When asked why he had not taken vaccine, he said in an interview with Jovem Pan radio, ‘I've decided not to get vaccinated. I'm looking at new studies, I already have the highest immunization, why would I get vaccinated?’ [18]
He was decidedly against making vaccine mandatory for any govt sponsored programme. He said, ‘For me, freedom comes before everything else. If a citizen doesn't want to get vaccinated, that's his right and that's the end of it’[ [18]
Brazilian media reported that Pfizer had sent 53 e-mails seeking response to their offer for 70 million doses of Covid vaccines at half price. The health minister of Bolsonaro govt termed the gesture of Pfizer as a aggressive one. Thus at least for six months Bolsonaro could delay the purchase of Pfizer vaccine that did cost 44 Brazilian Dollar.[19]
The media trumpeting the life saving potential of vaccine launched scathing attack on Bolsonaro and ascribed his decision to “dismiss the vaccine offer from various pharma companies” to the “surging deaths in Brazil”. [20]
Though such high hopes on covid vaccines later proved to be further from the truth and all cause deaths actually surged all over the world following vaccine roll out, the deafening pitch for vaccine had led Lula to make it a big election issue and Bolosonaro’s denial of Covid and resistance against vaccine became a shot in the arms of Lula.
After three months of his comeback as president, Lula has brought back Bolso Familia, the flagship welfare scheme introduced by his previous govt. in 2003. As a matter of fact, it was a World Bank aided programme.[21]
The other social welfare programmes such as Bolso Escola and Bolso Alimentac~ea were clubbed under this direct cash transfer scheme. The people living below poverty line ( those whose monthly income is below 28US$), are the targeted beneficiary. The leading woman of the family is entitled to get this meager money on the condition that her children must go to the school and participate in vaccination. If the child is below 16 years, the mother will get a monthly allowance of 13 US$ per child. If the age of child is between 16 to 17, the mother will get 15US$ per child. [22]
World Bank has claimed that this conditional cash transfer programme has changed the lives of Brazilian and reduced their poverty. The Economist praised it as a creator of “”happy family” . [23] The reality is far from it. A study conducted by The Federal University of Pernambuco, using sophisticated statistical methods, inferred that 87% of the money is used, by families living in rural areas, to buy food. [22]
The targeted family may loose the entitlement if the child fails to comply with the required percentage of presence in the school. The entire details of compliance and the amount of cash transferred is monitored and controlled by a system enabled by satellites and the internet via radio waves, which allows the exchange of data with the Municipalities of more remote locations, even in that there is no electricity or telephone.[22]
However, cash is not given directly to the beneficiary. A citizenship card in the form of a debit card is given and the entire transaction is conducted through the second largest state run Bank.
Therefore, it is no wonder that BMGF is greatly amused by this elaborate control on the lives of almost one third of population of Brazil. They described it as a innovative way of ensuring women’s empowerment over the vast swathes of poorest countries. [24]
In tandem with his electoral promise, Lula has recently publicly declared ‘The Bolsa Família is coming back, and it is coming back with something important; it is coming back with conditions. The children have to be in school. If they are not in school, the mother loses the benefit,’
He went on to say, “The children have to be vaccinated. Suppose they don’t have a vaccination certificate. In that case, the mother will lose the benefit," [25]
On Feb7, 2023, The Rio Times, the polpular Brazilian English news portal published a big news with headline, “Lula says that parents will be forced to vaccinate their children to keep government aid flowing” [26]
Lula also said that the program would again require prenatal care for pregnant women when they are beneficiaries of the aid. Health Minister Nísia Trindade also spoke but did not say which vaccines would be required.
“Vaccination is a child’s right,” Nísia declared about the requirement of proof of vaccination to receive Bolsa Família, said the report. [26]
Pharmaceutical companies and corporate magnets are obviously upbeat with such big measures taken by their “comeback kid” [28]. But the question remains- will the destitute millions of Brazil ever be obliged to Lula’s benevolence and meekly subservient to the grand corporate strategy of turning their country into a land of cheapest human guniepigs? Will the poor mothers be happy with meager allowance after submitting their children for forced vaccination? Will they keep saying Viva Lula!
Nuremberg Code upheld the right to informed consent as the bed rock principle for any kind of medical intervention. Giving vaccines is a medical intervention and when it is made a pre-condition for availing a means of survival, moreover, when the poor parents are forced to get their children jabbed to keep the basic allowance coming, it tantamounts to a grave crime against humanity.
Article 6.1 of UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bio-ethics and Human Rights says, ‘Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be 1. carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice’[29]
Lula’s comeback has been hailed by corporate media and left commentators as the left resurgence in Latin America. They are now required to clarify whether this new kind of Lulite leftism is all set to annihilate the fundamental right to one’s own body or not.


*Kolkata based, Indian practicing physician who have been extensively speaking and writing against dominating Covid narrative and vaccine mandate. His articles were published in and UHO website



Dev Anand ably acted as westernised, urban educated, modern hero, as also anti-hero

By Harsh Thakor  On September 26th we celebrated the birth centenary of legendary actor Dev Anand. Dev Saab carved out a new epoch or made a path breaking contribution in portraying romanticism and action in Bollywood cinema, giving his style or mannerisms a new colour. Arguably no Bollywood star manifested glamour in such a dignified or serene manner or struck the core of an audience’s soul in romantic melodies. Possibly we missed this evergreen star being cast in a Hollywood film. Dev Anand is like an inextinguishable soul of Bollywood. Although not as artistic or intense as Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor or Ashok Kumar ,Dev Anand surpassed them all for liveliness or flamboyance, with his performances radiating g energy on the screen, in realms rarely transcended. In his own right, Dev Saab, was a craftsman, like his classical contemporaries, with a characteristic composure. Perhaps never was a Bollywood star so suave, bubbling or charming as Dev Anand, who often looked like an Indian versi

Why Govt of India, Sangh Parivar want to stop the use of ‘India’? What's in a name?

By Ram Puniyani  Coincidentally after the opposition parties came together to form INDIA (Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance), the ruling BJP is desisting from the use of word India in official communiqués and its parent organizations RSS has issued a fatwa that only word Bharat should be used for our country. While inviting the representative’s participants of G 20, the President issued the invitation in the name of ‘Rashtrapati of Bharat’. Since then BJP is on the track of avoiding the use of the word India in all its pronouncements, saying this word smacks of colonial legacy since this word was given to the country by British colonial rulers. Mr. Hemant Biswa Sarma of BJP said that word India is part of the colonial legacy and should be removed. RSS chief and other functionaries have intensified this message. Speaking at a function at Guwahati Mr. Bhagwat, stated “We must stop using the word India and start using Bharat. At times we use India to make those who speak Eng

Significant step towards empowering and particularly engaging with informal workers

ActionAid note on drive to empower informal sector workers Odisha with the support of District Labour Department: *** The Odisha Unorganised Workers Social Security Board (OUWSSB) facilitated an Unorganized Workers Awareness Camp at the Red Cross Bhawan in Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The event took place in collaboration with the District Labour Department at Khordha, Centre for Child and Women Development and ActionAid Association. This informative event aimed at empowering informal sector workers by disseminating crucial information regarding their eligibility for various social security schemes provided by the Government of Odisha.

Abrogation of Art 370: Increasing alienation, relentless repression, simmering conflict

One year after the abrogation by the Central Government of Art. 370 in Kashmir, what is the situation in the Valley. Have the promises of peace, normalcy and development been realised? What is the current status in the Valley? Here is a detailed note by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties , “Jammu & Kashmir: One Year after Abrogation of Art. 370: Increasing Alienation, Relentless Repression, Simmering Conflict”:

Why originality of Gandhi's thoughts, example of his life still inspire people world over

By Moin Qazi*  Mahatma Gandhi's birth anniversary reopens a familiar debate around his legacy every year. How could a frail man use his moral strength to galvanize 400 million Indians in their struggle for independence from the mighty British Empire? How did Gandhi inspire ordinary people to turn fear into fearlessness and anger into love? What were his tools for fighting colonialism? How could he inspire the world to embrace his philosophy of nonviolence? What can we learn from him today? And is he still relevant?

Sewer workers not given ESI cards that would ensure health benefits they need the most

A note by the Dalit Adivasi Shakti Adhikar Manch (DASAM), an organization working for the issues of sanitation workers in Delhi NCR, on right to life and dignity which still seems light years away for sewer workers: *** Exploitation of Sewer workers is not just a labour issue, but it is rooted in the caste system and cannot be separated from the historical socio-religious-cultural-economic exploitation of the Dalit community! Stated Mr. Y.S. Gill, Senior Journalist and Documentary Film maker in the press conference organised by Dalit Adivasi Shakti Adhikar Manch (DASAM) in Integrated Social Initiatives (ISI), Lodhi Road, New Delhi on issues of sewer workers in Delhi. The press conference was attended by a number of community members, activists, members of the civil society, students etc.

Agro-biodiversity through seed identification, conservation, replication, crop selection

By Kuntal Mukherjee, Basant Yadav, Shivnath Yadav* This article is mainly based on a journey of the three of us since 2010 based on field experience, study of different articles, reflective journeys with local community based organisations, villagers and practitioners in Chhattisgarh. The slow growth of Agriculture in India with near stagnation in productivity since mid ‘80s in contrast to the remarkable growth during the green revolution period has come to the front as a great concern. In post WTO era Indian Agriculture has been witnessing structural changes, uncontrolled influx of agriculture goods and commodities from foreign countries due to open market nature. The gradual reduction in subsidies from internal production leads to increasing cost of production of agriculture produces at the farm gate. It causes gradual decrease in internal production as well as productivity and posing threats to small farm and stakeholders. 

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on.

Regretful: Kapil Dev retired not leaving Indian cricket with integrity he upheld

By Harsh Thakor  Kapil Dev scaled heights as an entertainer and a player upholding the spirit of the game almost unparalleled in his era. In his time he was cricket’s ultimate mascot of sportsmanship On his day Kapil could dazzle in all departments to turn the tempo of game in the manner of a Tsunami breaking in. He radiated r energy, at a level rarely scaled in his era on a cricket field. Few ever blended aggression with artistry so comprehenisively. Although fast medium, he could be as daunting with the ball as the very best, with his crafty outswinger, offcutter, slower ball and ball that kicked from a good length. Inspite of bowling on docile tracks on the subcontinent, Kapil had 434 scalps, with virtually no assistance. I can never forget how he obtained pace and movement on flat pancakes, trapping the great Vivian Richards in Front or getting Geoff Boycott or Zaheer Abbas caught behind. No paceman carried the workload of his team’s bowling attack on his shoulders in his eras muc

Pot calling the kettle black: EAM Jaishankar accusing Global North of double standards

By Chandra Vikash*  While addressing a Ministerial Session on Saturday 23 September 2023 in New York on the sidelines of the ongoing UN General Assembly session titled ‘South Rising: Partnerships, Institutions and Ideas’, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that economically dominant countries are leveraging production capabilities and those who have institutional influence have weaponized these capabilities. He also cited an example of Covid-19 and stressed that it is still a world of double standards."