Generative AI as 'potent weapon and shield' in battle of political misinformation

By Haziq Jeelani*
In the pulsating heart of the digital era, the political arena is ceaselessly molded by the swift and relentless flow of information. The line between fact and fiction often blurs, creating a nebulous landscape where truth and deceit intertwine.

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has added a new dimension to this dynamic, wielding the power to both fuel and quell the spread of misinformation.

Pandora's box of generative AI

Generative AI, with its uncanny ability to craft realistic text, images, and videos, holds the potential to significantly amplify the problem of misinformation in politics. Deepfake technology, a subset of generative AI, can fabricate eerily convincing videos of politicians uttering words they never spoke or performing actions they never took, sowing seeds of discord and confusion among voters.

Similarly, AI algorithms can generate counterfeit news articles or social media posts, meticulously tailored to specific audiences, potentially swaying public opinion and influencing the outcome of elections.
In the 2020 Gabonese presidential election, an AI-generated video of President Ali Bongo was circulated, in which he appeared to be in robust health despite having suffered a stroke. The video was later unmasked as a deepfake, raising alarm bells about the use of AI to manipulate public opinion during political campaigns.

In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, AI was reportedly used to generate propaganda and counterfeit news stories that were then disseminated on social media platforms. These stories were designed to stoke political divisions and influence voter behavior.
AI-powered bots have been deployed to spread misinformation on social media platforms. For instance, during the Brexit referendum in the UK, automated bots were used to amplify certain viewpoints, creating an illusion of widespread support or opposition to Brexit.

AI can also be used to analyze vast amounts of data on individuals' online behavior, enabling political campaigns to micro-target specific groups with tailored misinformation. This was a significant concern during the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the data of millions of Facebook users was used without consent to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Shield of machine learning against misinformation

On the flip side, machine learning, another branch of AI, can be a potent tool in the fight against misinformation. Advanced algorithms can be trained to detect and flag potential misinformation, helping to stem its spread.

Data of millions of Facebook users was used to influence voter behavior in the 2016 U.S. presidential election

For instance, a recent study titled "Va ex ccine sentiment analysis using BERT + NBSVM and geo-spatial approaches" leverages a combination of BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and NBSVM (Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine) for sentiment analysis. This approach identifies and classifies people's feelings about vaccines, thereby providing useful insights to counter misinformation.

Several advanced algorithms and systems can be employed to prevent the spread of misinformation. Machine learning models can be trained on large datasets to recognize patterns associated with misinformation, such as certain phrasing or source reliability. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques can be used to analyze the content of news articles or social media posts, identifying potential misinformation based on the language used.

Moreover, the use of semi-supervised learning, as discussed in "A systematic literature review of cyber-security data repositories and performance assessment metrics for semi-supervised learning," can be beneficial in situations where only a few labels are necessary or available for building robust models.
In conclusion, while generative AI poses a significant challenge in the fight against misinformation in politics, machine learning offers a promising solution. By leveraging advanced algorithms and systems, it is possible to detect and counteract misinformation, ensuring that the political discourse remains grounded in fact rather than fiction.
---
*PhD student at Claremont Grad (USA), consults on AI. Twitter: @hazytalks

Comments

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a déjà-vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.

जैविक जीवित संसाधनों व प्रकृति पर निर्भर मजदूरों की व्यापक आर्थिक सुरक्षा कैसे हो?

- राज कुमार सिन्हा* भारत में 60 करोड़ से अधिक लोग भूमि, जल, जंगल और समुद्र जैसे प्राकृतिक स्रोतों पर निर्भर हैं । देश में 14.6 करोड़ छोटे और सीमांत किसान, 14.4 करोड़ खेतिहर मजदूर ( बड़ी संख्या में दलित हैं), 27.5 करोड़ वन निवासी, 2.8 करोड़ मछुआरे, 1.3 करोड़ पशुपालक और 1.7 करोड़ कारीगर हैं जो सीधे तौर पर प्रकृति के साथ और प्रकृति के भरोसे काम कर रहे हैं । लगभग 6 करोड़ मौसमी मजदूर हैं जो काम के सिलसिले में लगातार अपने गांव से बाहर जाते हैं और लौटते हैं। प्रकृति निर्भर समुदायों की आर्थिक गतिविधियां जो बड़े पैमाने पर जीवन निर्वाह और छोटी आय के लिए है। वर्तमान आर्थिक नीतियों के कारण, जो कॉर्पोरेट्स और बड़े व्यवसायों का समर्थन करती है, प्रकृति निर्भर समुदाय के लिए अव्यवहारिक होती जा रही है।

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा* जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए।

The WHO Pandemic Agreement: Why India should reconsider its stance

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* For more than the past three years, the WHO has been trying its best to push the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations in unholy haste, instead of conducting a proper appraisal of the impact of the measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic—a routine exercise after any pandemic to guide future strategies. This raises questions about whether the WHO, under China’s influence, is trying to conceal its acts of omission and commission during the pandemic, including obstructing investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The WHO recently faced a setback when the USA decided to cut all ties with the organization.

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur* Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

By Rajiv Shah A new report by Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."

21-day security operation targets Maoist presence, prompts questions on civil impact

By Harsh Thakor* Union Home Minister Amit Shah has described a recent counter-insurgency operation along the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border as a significant achievement for Indian security forces in their efforts against Maoist groups. The three-week-long operation in the Karreguttalu Hills reportedly resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals identified as members of Maoist formations.

Search This Blog