Skip to main content

Modi government 'refusing to support' MSP for farmers amidst huge doles to corporates

By Vikas Meshram 

The Minimum Support Price (MSP) was introduced in 1966-67, when there was severe food shortage in India. Subsequently, the government improved wheat and rice varieties to increase domestic food grain production. Varieties of seeds, better irrigation systems, mechanization, expensive 'green revolution' technologies, including chemical fertilizers and pesticides, were promoted.
Hence, to compensate for the increased agricultural costs, the government provides a minimum support price to farmers as guaranteed financial aid. This increased foodgrain production and India achieved food security and self-sufficiency in foodgrains.
As a result of proper implementation of minimum base price, MSP, intensive farming technology with the help of groundwater irrigation was adopted in states like Punjab and Haryana, which recorded high productivity of major cereal crops (wheat and rice). The annual productivity of these two crops reached 10-12 MT per hectare. This is almost double the national average and also ranks among the highest globally.
Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have made similar remarkable progress in the last decade by effectively adopting a minimum base price system. Thus, the MSP policy ensured the adoption of better technology in agriculture which has increased wheat production in the country by 10 times and rice production by 4 times compared to 1960.
Meanwhile, despite the availability of high-productivity intensive agricultural technologies, the area and production of oilseeds, pulses and coarse grains declined in the absence of minimum support price system.
It is regrettable that the Narendra Modi government, which awarded the highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, to eminent agronomist MS Swaminathan months after his tragic demise, has shied away from the the Swaminathan formula, whose implementation the farmers have been demanding by having a legislation for guaranteed price is necessary for agriculture.
The Modi government is trying to suppress the current farmers’ agitation in various ways. One should note that Modi as the Chief Minister of Gujarat advocated Guarantee Act and also spoke about implementing the report of the National Farmers' Commission headed by Swaminathan. After becoming Prime Minister, Modi and BJP have changed their stance on both the issues. As a result, the agriculture sector is now in dire straits, waiting to emerge from its existential crisis, even though foodgrains production has been increasing year-on-year and buffer stocks have ensured adequate supply of foodgrains.
Farmers' income will double -- this claim was important for Modi to win for the second time. Now, Modi and BJP are keeping silent on the issue in the background of farmers' intense struggle for guaranteed MSP. It is distressing that extraordinarily harsh and brutal measures have been taken to prevent the farmer agitators from crossing the border in Haryana to reach Delhi.
The Modi government had said that after the consecration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya on January 22, 2024, Ram Rajya would begin. In the system envisioned under the Rama Rajya, justice and fairness are followed and people are ruled with consideration. But, paradoxically, with such major claims centred on Ram Rajya, the BJP rule in Haryana is trampling on the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of farmers to agitate and protest, purposefully using drones, pellet guns and other coercive measures to prevent them from marching towards Delhi.
Because of such punitive measures hundreds of farmers participating in the peaceful march have been injured. Many farmers have suffered eye injuries, and many of them have lost their sight. Drones have been used to fire teargas shells, too. The 21-year-old young farmer Shubhkaran Singh died due to bullet injury. This has created a lot of anger against the Haryana government, and the agitating farmers have vowed to continue the agitation peacefully.
The corporate-controlled media is propagating a false narrative that farmers' tractors at protest sites are nothing more than makeshift military tanks deployed to incite violence against the law enforcement agencies. The purpose of such reports is to discredit farmers and their struggle.
Under the Modi government, while the agriculture sector is awaiting justice, the corporate sector is enjoying the tax. Since September 2019 the basic corporate tax rate for corporate companies has been reduced from 30 percent to 22 percent. The tax rate for newly formed companies has been reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent.
All these measures to reduce the tax rate have been taken to "attract investment", according to the finance ministry, but corporates have not made any additional investments after the tax breaks they have received, and this has strained the government exchequer. It is estimated that corporates benefited a whopping Rs 6 lakh crore from the tax cut, for which they did not have to protest.
In 2006, the National Farmers Commission headed by Swaminathan recommended minimum base price (MSP). The objective was to provide minimum remunerative price to the farmers for their produce, protect consumer interest by controlling market inflation and ensure food security of the country. By not implementing the recommendation that MSP should be at least 50% higher than the total average cost ( C-2 cost), the government is exploiting the farmers, as it is buying grain from the farmers at less than the total cost.
By not enacting the Guarantee Price Act, the government has given free rein to middlemen to exploit the farmers. They buy the farmers' produce at a lower than the guaranteed price. In the absence of a legal guarantee of MSP, more than 90 percent of the agricultural crops produced in the country are purchased by middlemen at rates 20 to 50 percent below the MSP price, thus causing a loss of Rs 20 lakh crore annually to the farmers.
Buying agricultural produce below MSP from the middlemen does not bring any benefit to the consumer, as the prices of agricultural producers in the retail open market are always 50 percent higher than the MSP price, which means that due to biased government policies, the middlemen are eating up all the profits in the Indian agricultural produce market.
A report by Indian Council for Research on International Relations-Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ( ICRIER-OECD) shows that by keeping the prices of agricultural commodities artificially low, the government's biased policies have continuously kept farmers below poverty line. The report states that low agricultural commodity prices due to biased government policies had cost Indian farmers Rs 14 lakh crore in 2022 alone and Rs 45 lakh crore between 2000 and 2017 at 2017 prices, and farmers are committing suicide due to exploitation based on this biased government policy.
In order to make the minimum base price a legal guarantee, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act needs to be amended by inserting a clause saying that 'it is not legally permissible to purchase at prices lower than the declared MSP minimum base prices in the auction of agricultural produce'.
Many doubts are being expressed on the implementation of legal minimum base guaranteed price. It is said that agricultural produce would not be sold in the markets of Agricultural Produce Market Committees, traders may boycott the purchase of agricultural produce, and the government does not have physical and financial resources for purchase, storage, marketing etc. of the purchased agricultural produce.
All these doubts propagated by vested interest lobbies in administrative and business community are irrational. While there is a slight surplus in India's wheat and rice production compared to domestic demand, there is still a large deficit in the production of oilseeds, pulses and other crops.
In 2022, domestic demand for wheat was 103 million metric tons and for rice it was 109 million metric tons. In February 2022 the Indian government forced a ban on wheat exports due to fall in wheat production. In an attempt to increase local supply in view of the decline in cultivated area, the export of rice was also banned. Therefore, a boycott of agricultural production in the legal norms of minimum base price by traders is a fallacy, as the supply of foodstuff is less than the demand for agricultural produce.
The fact is that the government has been able to procure only 26 million metric tons of wheat against the target of 44.4 million metric tons set for the year 2023. In India, which claims to have a Rs 415 lakh crore annual economy, the government waives off loans of Rs 20-25 lakh crore to industrialists. Given this backdrop, the MSP guarantee law should be enacted to save the farmers. Middlemen and lobbyists with vested interests, meanwhile, make childish claims about the collapse of the country's economy.
According to the government, over Rs 2.26 crore was transferred to farmers for the purchase of over 60 million metric tonnes of paddy and 26 million metric tonnes of wheat. Apart from this, India imports edible oil worth Rs 1.38 lakh crore and pulses worth Rs 20,000 crore in 2022-23, i.e. India already spends more than Rs 5 lakh crore on government procurement and import of agricultural products.
Hence, claims that the legal guarantee of minimum base price will lead to economic crisis for India are completely irrational. After all, the guaranteed value of total production of 23 crops is about Rs 17 lakh crore, as per government estimates.

Comments

TRENDING

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

A Marxist intellectual who dwelt into complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.

Four J&K MLAs visit Wular lake, pledge support to fisher community, environmental conservation

By Shamim Ahmed*   In a historic meeting that highlighted both environmental and social concerns, four Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) visited Wular Lake to meet with the fisherfolk community, signaling a significant step in addressing their longstanding issues. This gathering, organized with the support of dedicated advocates, marks a strengthening of efforts to both safeguard the lake’s ecosystem and support the community’s welfare.

Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India. The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covax...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

Will Left victory in Sri Lanka deliver economic sovereignty plan, go beyond 'tired' IMF agenda?

By Atul Chandra, Vijay Prashad*  On September 22, 2024, the Sri Lankan election authority announced that Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) alliance won the presidential election. Dissanayake, who has been the leader of the left-wing JVP since 2014, defeated 37 other candidates, including the incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe of the United National Party (UNP) and his closest challenger Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya.