Skip to main content

Govt of India told: Toxic technologies being peddled to 'promote' herbicide tolerant rice

Counterview Desk 

More than 400 signatories have endorsed a representation to Shivraj Singh Chauhan, Union Minister for Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare (photo), stating that herbicide tolerant (HT) rice varieties launched by Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), which comes under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), are a matter of “serious concern”, insisting on “stopping cultivation of these varieties.”
Noting that India is recognised as a Centre of Origin and Diversity for rice, the representation said, HT crops themselves pose a big problem in terms of environmental and health safety, other than socio-economic considerations that arise out of such crops, the representation, authored by three senior activists and experts*, said, ICAR has done something “unlawful as far as the pesticides regulatory regime in India is concerned.”
In fact, it underlined, Imazethapyr, one of the varieties, features in the list of bannable pesticides in a PIL being heard by the Supreme Court of India.

Text:

In June 2024, ICAR launched for commercial cultivation two herbicide-tolerant (HT) basmati rice varieties, tolerant to the direct application of Imazethapyr herbicide to eradicate weeds in the DSR (Directly Seeded Rice) system. DSR itself is promoted on the claim that farmers can grow paddy crop directly in the field without the need for transplanting seedlings from the nursery. It is not out of place to point out that paddy used to be grown through direct seedings in many parts of India once upon a time, before farmers were shifted away from this practice to transplanting.
It is said that these HT varieties were developed through non-GM techniques using a mutated ALS gene (which in turn has been done through a chemical mutant called ethyl methanesulfonate), through a MAS derived HT near-isogenic line of Basmati rice varieties PB1121 renamed as Pusa Basmati 1979, and PB 1509 named as Pusa Basmati 1985. These varieties were initially launched in 2021 and released now for commercial cultivation by farmers.
Imazethapyr is a broad spectrum, post-emergence herbicide. Alongside this, IARI is also recommending pendimethalin for pre-emergence action after 72 hours after sowing and Bispyribac-sodium after 18-20 days. For effective weed management, both kinds of herbicides are being promoted by ICAR scientists with farmers using these HT varieties.
We are familiar with the fact that you have been urging farmers to use non-chemical practices in their agriculture, to save themselves from a variety of negative impacts. Scientists from NARS institutes are also writing articles cautioning about the environmental impacts of these HT varieties on biodiversity and food security. The hype would lead to further monocultures leading to further erosion of varietal diversity as well as crop/general biodiversity. Monocultures by themselves are a threat to our food security.
It is not just public-spirited scientists who can think beyond the short term technical fixes. Farmers’ organisations and civil society groups in the country are worried too about toxic technologies still being peddled by the Indian public sector research system, camouflaging them as beneficial for the farmers.
The environmental, health and economic issues related to HT crops have been well-debated already in India and abroad, and most countries do not allow HT crops for cultivation, irrespective of whether they have been bred using genetic engineering or not.
The emergence of super-weeds requiring the use of more and more deadly chemicals as a weed control technology in this approach, the increased levels of chemical residues in the food of consumers, the health impacts on farmers and farm workers when they work in chemically-sprayed fields and exposure to toxins, the fact that farm level sovereignty gets eroded when combo products of seeds and chemicals are controlled by external entities, the fact that this also means increased costs for farmers are all well-documented in scientific and other literature. In India, there is the additional concern with regard to socio-economic repercussions on poor agricultural labourers, that too poor rural women, with large scale use of HT seeds.
Meanwhile, while DSR has several advantages, experience in Punjab and Haryana is showing several practical challenges that farmers are encountering with DSR. It is not a universal solution for all types of soils, whether it is related to the textures of soil or nutrient availability, experience shows.
Against this backdrop, we wish to draw your attention to several additional facts:
  1. Imazethapyr is in the list of “bannable” pesticides for which a public interest litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court of India, listing 110 pesticides which have been banned in 2 or more countries elsewhere but continuing to be used in India. Imazethapyr has not been approved in 27 countries of the EU and the UK, and banned in Turkey). Meanwhile, Pendimethalin features in a draft ban order issued by Government of India initially after the Anupam Verma Committee report, but retracted later on in an unscientific and unjustified manner. This has also been challenged in the PIL in the Supreme Court.
  2. Importantly, Imazethapyr has not been legally registered for use in Paddy as per India’s insecticides regulatory regime! Its registered uses are only for soybean, groundnut, black gram, green gram and red gram. What are the seed containers of these HT basmati varieties stating, and what is the Imazethapyr label sold by dealers supposed to state? How did the ICAR take up research and later launch the varieties for commercial cultivation in blatant violation of the existing regulations? Will India’s pesticides regulatory regime now retro-fit this chemical into its registered uses without any testing?
  3. Equally importantly, we demand that the Government of India and its regulators show how herbicide safety assessment takes place in the country now in the context of HT crops, even if they are non-GM HT crops. Where are the regulations and scientific protocols for testing these herbicides for safety for use on HT crops? How will residue levels be fixed by FSSAI if there are no testing protocols for the herbicides to begin with?
  4. India is a Center of Origin and Diversity for rice, and among all other reasons, this certainly necessitates the application of the precautionary principle. Sufficient research has not been done in India on the long term effects of Imazethapyr tolerant rice varieties on traditional rice varieties.
  5. Further, basmati rice is also exported from India, and many importing countries have already rejected India’s tea, spices, basmati, wheat and other consignments citing SPS criteria. What will be the fate of this Imazethapyr resistant HT basmati rice from India?
  6. Paddy is used as a fodder crop. Some Imazethapyr labels warn against using Imazethapyr-sprayed crops as fodder for a stipulated period of time after spraying.
It is clear to us that while Imazethapyr and paddy varieties tolerant to it are being promoted with a façade that they are non-GM, that they would save water, farmers’ cost of cultivation, bring down stubble burning etc., the reality is that HT crops are being introduced by the Government of India surreptitiously even as it talks about natural farming and BPKP (Bharatiya Prakritik Krishi Paddhati). The biotech industry is surely excited about the introduction of HT crops such as these paddy varieties as non-GM, that too by the public sector route and hoping that this introduction will subsume the public resistance against these crops. However, this is not so. Through this letter, India’s farmers’ organisations and other civil society organisations would like to inform the Government of India that there will be stiff resistance from farmers and consumers. ICAR will have to face public protests if these HT varieties are not withdrawn immediately from the market. There will also be legal opposition through PILs since many matters of public interest have been ignored here.
In this regard, we urge you to step in to stop the distribution of this HT rice immediately. We also request you to ensure responsible science, statutory regulations and long term vision for our farming prevails in agricultural technology development in the country. 
---
*Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi, Public Policy Expert, Hyderabad; Kapil Shah, Jatan-A Mission for Sajiv Kheti, Vadodara; Kavitha Kuruganti, Coalition for a GM-Free India, Bangalore. Click here for signatories

Comments

TRENDING

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

A Marxist intellectual who dwelt into complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.

Four J&K MLAs visit Wular lake, pledge support to fisher community, environmental conservation

By Shamim Ahmed*   In a historic meeting that highlighted both environmental and social concerns, four Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) visited Wular Lake to meet with the fisherfolk community, signaling a significant step in addressing their longstanding issues. This gathering, organized with the support of dedicated advocates, marks a strengthening of efforts to both safeguard the lake’s ecosystem and support the community’s welfare.

Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India. The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covax...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Will Left victory in Sri Lanka deliver economic sovereignty plan, go beyond 'tired' IMF agenda?

By Atul Chandra, Vijay Prashad*  On September 22, 2024, the Sri Lankan election authority announced that Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) alliance won the presidential election. Dissanayake, who has been the leader of the left-wing JVP since 2014, defeated 37 other candidates, including the incumbent president Ranil Wickremesinghe of the United National Party (UNP) and his closest challenger Sajith Premadasa of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya.