Skip to main content

Politics behind BJP claims on demographic changes in Jharkhand: What do data say?

Counterview Desk  
Counterchecking BJP's claims of demography change in the State, the civil rights organisation, Jharkhand Janadhikar Mahasabha (JJM) has said that while on one hand BJP is talking about Bangladeshi infiltrators, on the other the Modi government and the previous BJP government "forcibly acquired the land of Adivasis for Adani Power Plant project." 
"They changed the state's energy policy to benefit Adanis by keeping Jharkhand at a loss and sent electricity to Bangladesh by keeping Santhal Pargana in the dark. Instead of talking about the root causes of decline in Adivasi population ratio, BJP only wants to create religious communalism and polarization by presenting wrong figures", it said.

Text:

Recently, BJP and its prominent leaders are continuously giving statements that large number of Bangladeshi infiltrators are settling in Jharkhand, Adivasi population is decreasing, Adivasi girls are being married to infiltrators, their land is being grabbed, love jihad, land jihad etc are rampant in Adivasi areas of Jharkhand. It is being said that after formation of Jharkhand state population of Adivasis in Santhal Pargana has decreased by 16% and that of Muslims has increased by 13%. MP Nishikant Dubey even gave a statement in the Parliament that in 2000, the Adivasi population in Santhal Pargana was 36% and now it is only 26% and Bangladeshi infiltration (Muslims) are responsible for this. All these claims are beyond fact. Sadly, most of the media is also spreading these claims without checking the facts. The facts are as follows:

Is the population of Jharkhand’s Adivasis decreasing?

According to the census, Adivasi population in Jharkhand in 1951 was 36% and in 1991 the same was 27.67% whereas Muslim population in 1991 was 12.18%. According to the last census (2011), there were 26.21% Adivasis in the state and 14.53% Muslims. In Santhal Pargana, the proportion of Adivasis was 29.91% in 2001 to 28.11% in 2011. So BJP's claim of 16% and 10% is false.
Sizeable decline in the proportion of Adivasis occurred between 1951 and 1991. The question is why? There are three main reasons:
  1. During this period, a large number of non-Adivasis came to Jharkhand from the surrounding states, especially in the cities and areas of mining and industries. For example, the proportion of Adivasis in Ranchi declined from 53.2% in 1961 to 43.6% in 1991. At the same time, 10.73 lakh migrants from other states came to Jharkhand in 1961, 14.29 lakh migrants in 1971 and 16.28 lakh migrants in 1981, most of whom were from North Bihar and other nearby states. Although most of them went back after work, many also settled down. Due to lack of priority for locals in jobs, non-implementation of Fifth Schedule provisions and tribal-specific laws, non-Adivasis from other states started settling here. 
  2. Due to displacement and lack of employment, Adivasis have been forced to migrate in lakhs for decades, which has a direct impact on their population growth rate. According to the 2017 Economic Survey report of the Central Government, about 50 lakh people aged 15-59 years from the state had migrated between 2001 and 2011. 
  3. The population growth rate of Adivasis has been lower than other non-tribal groups for decades. Between 1951-91, the annual exponential growth rate of the Adivasis population was 1.42, while that of Jharkhand as a whole was 2.03. Due to inadequate nutrition, inadequate health system and economic constraints, the death rate of Adivasis is higher than other communities.

Are Bangladeshi infiltrators entering Jharkhand on a large scale?

BJP leaders keep mentioning the number of Bangladeshi infiltrators in the country between 12 lakhs to 20 lakhs as per their whims. By naming infiltrators, they target the Muslims. But, the NDA government under the leadership of Narendra Modi has been continuously giving statements in the Parliament that they do not have any data regarding the number of Bangladeshi infiltrators. If we consider only the population of Muslims in Santhal Paargana, the increase of 2.15% as a proportion of the total population between 2001 and 2011 shows that the number of Muslims immigrating from Bangladesh would be much less than claimed (if at all).

Is love jihad happening in Jharkhand?

On one hand, BJP leaders are spreading communal hatred by using words like love jihad whereas Modi government has replied in the Parliament that there is nothing called love jihad in the law and the central investigating agencies have not registered any such case. It is worth noting that a person of any religion or community has the full constitutional right to marry a person of any other religion or community. However, according to a 2013 research, only 5.7% inter-religion marriages have taken place in Jharkhand which includes all religious faiths.

Are Adivasi lands being looted?

For decades, non-Adivasis have been taking over the land of Adivasis by violating CNT and SPT acts. The urban areas of the Fifth Schedule area are a clear proof of this. BJP is trying to divert the narrative from the truth by using communal words like land jihad.

What is BJP's politics?

On one hand BJP is talking about Bangladeshi infiltrators, while on the other hand Modi and Raghuvar Das governments had forcibly acquired the land of Adivasis for Adani Power Plant project. They changed the state's energy policy to benefit Adani by keeping Jharkhand at a loss and sent electricity to Bangladesh by keeping Santhal Pargana in the dark.
Instead of talking about the root causes of decline in Adivasi population ratio, BJP only wants to create religious communalism and polarization by presenting wrong figures. On one hand, BJP is expressing concern for the Adivasis population, while on the other hand, it is not only silent on the Sarna Code, 27% reservation for backward classes and Khatian based domicile policy passed by the Jharkhand government, but is also trying its best to stop them. Modi government is also running away from caste census which would make the current situation of communities and different castes clear.
Please note that the issues of Adivasis highlighted here were the basic issues of the Jharkhand Movement. If BJP is not accepting these issues, then it is also questioning the movement. Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan demands the state government to take immediate action against those spreading communalism by presenting wrong data and start a public discussion on the above-mentioned core issues.
---  
Click here for signatories of the Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan

Comments

TRENDING

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a déjà-vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement: Why India should reconsider its stance

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  For more than the past three years, the WHO has been trying its best to push the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations in unholy haste, instead of conducting a proper appraisal of the impact of the measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic—a routine exercise after any pandemic to guide future strategies.  This raises questions about whether the WHO, under China’s influence, is trying to conceal its acts of omission and commission during the pandemic, including obstructing investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The WHO recently faced a setback when the USA decided to cut all ties with the organization. 

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker  The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.

Killed in Chhattisgarh encounter, this Maoist leader suffered from overreliance on military actions

By Harsh Thakor*  Namballa Keshava Rao, also known as Basav Raj, General Secretary of the banned CPI (Maoist), was killed in an encounter in which 27 Maoist cadre died during a security operation in the Abujhmad forest, Narayanpur district, Chhattisgarh, on the morning of May 21. This marks the first time in the history of the CPI (Maoist) that its General Secretary has been killed in an encounter. Rao is the second General Secretary after Charu Mazumdar to be killed by security forces.

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by  Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the  Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur*  Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.

Ninety years of the socialist movement in India: What's the path head

By Dr. Sunilam*  We are all aware of what the leaders active in the socialist movement have accomplished over the past 90 years. We are also well-acquainted with the sacrifices made by leaders and workers during the freedom struggle and the socialist movement. For the past 45 years, since I became interested in joining the socialist movement as an activist, I have been keen on understanding and analyzing its history. Inspired by 101-year-old freedom fighter Dr. G.G. Parikh and in collaboration with comrades from the Socialist Samagam, I have actively participated in organizing events to mark the 82nd, 85th, and now the 90th anniversaries of the socialist movement.