Skip to main content

Starmer's 'lumpen politics'? Fading mass hope following Conservative defeat in UK

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak 
In a Labour Party Election Broadcast on April 16th, 2024, Sir Keir Starmer highlighted how his working-class background influences his approach to politics. In a BBC interview on May 27th, 2024, Sir Starmer reinforced his working-class roots and promised to serve the interests of the working people in Britain. He even described himself as a progressive and a socialist. However, the mass hope following the Conservative Party's defeat is fading as Starmer's politics and policies as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom are revealed. 
As he unveils himself as PM, he not only betrays his working-class voters but also his own working-class heritage. Starmer’s ideology, political positions, principles and policies changes more often than British weather. There is nothing called political pledge to principles for him.  
In a recent press briefing on 27th of August 2024, Prime Minister Starmer warned the working masses in Britain that the upcoming October budget would be painful. He advised people to "accept short-term pain for long-term good." He is planning to implement Tory austerity measures that will increase the cost of everyday living for working people. 
Starmerism is an ideology-free zone where commitment to principles is denied, and the lumpen politics of opportunism are promoted to uphold the interests of the transnational and national capitalist classes in Britain. He seized every opportunity to suppress democratic dissent within the party, ensuring that there is no space for popular leftist leadership or socialist debates within the Labour Party under his leadership. 
In doing so, Starmer has not only dismantled the Labour Party as a democratic socialist party but also transformed the party into a second-rate Tory party. The traditional labour party is doomed, and the future of Britain looks bleak under Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.
Austerity is not an economic policy; it is a project by the capitalist class to drain the pockets of working people. Austerity measures create economic conditions where the working masses suffer in crisis, normalising low wages and naturalising job insecurity. These conditions of low wages and job insecurity undermine a productive environment for innovation and diminish the productive abilities of the working class. 
Britain began experiencing rising wealth inequalities and increasing low incomes during the 1980s due to policies of liberalisation, privatisation, and globalisation. These policies introduced structural adjustments and internal austerity measures as policy alternatives. In reality, austerity can neither help in the short term nor in the long term. 
It works against social, economic, and scientific progress and prosperity. It creates conditions of destitution that destabilises economy. Therefore, austerity is a destructive economic choice, now being adopted by the Labour government under the leadership of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.  
Starmer has not only dismantled the Labour Party as a democratic socialist party but also transformed the party into a second-rate Tory party
The working people are suffering from the rising cost of living crisis, whereas British corporations are making super profits. The Labour Party government under Keir Starmer is working like the Tories to protect the super-rich in Britain by marginalising the working people. His electoral promises and his actions in government are diametrically opposed to each other. 
The working masses did not vote for austerity measures in health, education, transportation, and other welfare services. People gave a landslide victory to the Labour Party to recover from the crisis, not to normalise it in their everyday lives in Britain.
The lumpen politics of the Labour Party under Starmer's leadership reveals that there is no fundamental difference between the Conservative and Labour leadership. Both uphold the interests of the British establishment. It is clear that these two parties have failed and have no plans to uphold the interests of the working masses. 
Such an ideological alliance between the two mainstream parties in Britain creates an opportunity to establish the foundations of alternative politics based on peace, prosperity, and progress. By centering the interests of the working masses, this alternative approach can address the political and economic crises in British society.
Working-class mobilisation is the first step toward defeating these two mainstream parties and politics of their lumpen leadership. The working class's dependency on the British establishment must end. It is time to establish working-class politics as the only viable alternative to establishment politics. 
No more expenditures on wars and focus on people’s welfare. These possibilities can only address ongoing everyday crisis in Britain. 

Comments

TRENDING

рд░ाрдЬрд╕्рдеाрди, рдордз्рдпрдк्рд░рджेрд╢, рдкрд╢्рдЪिрдо рдмंрдЧाрд▓, рдЭाрд░рдЦंрдб рдФрд░ рдХेрд░рд▓ рдлिрд╕рдб्рдбी: рдЬрд▓ рдЬीрд╡рди рдоिрд╢рди рдХे рд▓рдХ्рд╖्рдп рдХो рдкाрдиे рд╕рдорди्рд╡िрдд рдк्рд░рдпाрд╕ рдЬрд░ूрд░ी

- рд░ाрдЬ рдХुрдоाрд░ рд╕िрди्рд╣ा*  рдЬрд▓ рд╕ंрд╕ाрдзрди рд╕े рдЬुрдб़ी рд╕्рдеाрдпी рд╕рдоिрддि рдиे рд╡рд░्рддрдоाрди рд▓ोрдХрд╕рднा рд╕рдд्рд░ рдоें рдкेрд╢ рд░िрдкोрд░्рдЯ рдоें рдмрддाрдпा рд╣ै рдХि "рдирд▓ рд╕े рдЬрд▓" рдоिрд╢рди рдоें рд░ाрдЬрд╕्рдеाрди, рдордз्рдпрдк्рд░рджेрд╢, рдкрд╢्рдЪिрдо рдмंрдЧाрд▓, рдЭाрд░рдЦंрдб рдФрд░ рдХेрд░рд▓ рдлिрд╕рдб्рдбी рд╕ाрдмिрдд рд╣ुрдП рд╣ैं। рдЬрдмрдХि рджेрд╢ рдХे 11 рд░ाрдЬ्рдпों рдоें рд╢рдд-рдк्рд░рддिрд╢рдд рдЧ्рд░ाрдоीрдгों рдХो рдирд▓ рд╕े рдЬрд▓ рдЖрдкूрд░्рддि рд╢ुрд░ू рдХрд░ рджी рдЧрдИ рд╣ै। рд░िрдкोрд░्рдЯ рдоें рд╕рдоिрддि рдиे рдХेंрдж्рд░ рд╕рд░рдХाрд░ рдХो рд╕िрдлाрд░िрд╢ рдХी рд╣ै рдХि рдоिрд╢рди рдкुрд░ा рдХрд░рдиे рдоें рд░ाрдЬ्рдп рд╕рд░рдХाрд░ों рдХी рд╕рдорд╕्рдпाрдУं рдкрд░ рдЧौрд░ рдХिрдпा рдЬाрдП। 

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on. A soft attitude always creates strong relationships. A relationship should not depend only on spoken words. They should rely on understanding the unspoken feeling too. So w...

Censor Board's bullying delays 'Phule': A blow to India's democratic spirit

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  A film based on the life and legacy of Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule was expected to release today. Instead, its release has been pushed to the last week of April. The reason? Protests by self-proclaimed guardians of caste pride—certain Brahmin groups—and forced edits demanded by a thoroughly discredited Censor Board.

CASR urges immediate halt to Operation Kagaar, calls for peace talks with Maoists

By A Representative   The Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a collective of over 40 civil society organizations, has issued a press statement demanding an immediate end to "Operation Kagaar" and alleged state-led killings of Maoist rebels and indigenous people in central India. The group also called on the central government to create a conducive environment for initiating peace talks with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Maoist call for peace talks: A democratic opening amidst state repression?

By Harsh Thakor*  The readiness of the CPI (Maoist), a banned organisation, for peace talks is seen as signifying a democratic gesture that should be welcomed by all who uphold democratic values. The ongoing conflict under ‘Operation Kagaar’ in Central India represents a clash between alleged state aggression and self-defence by oppressed communities. Critics argue that the Indian government has violated constitutional principles by promoting corporate expansion in Adivasi regions under the pretext of development, endangering the lives and livelihoods of local populations.

Incarcerated for 2,424 days, Sudhir Dhawale combines Ambedkarism with Marxism

By Harsh Thakor   One of those who faced incarceration both under Congress and BJP rule, Sudhir Dhawale was arrested on June 6, 2018, one of the first six among the 16 people held in what became known as the Elgar Parishad case. After spending 2,424 days in incarceration, he became the ninth to be released from jail—alongside Rona Wilson, who walked free with him on January 24. The Bombay High Court granted them bail, citing the prolonged imprisonment without trial as a key factor. I will always remember the moments we spent together in Mumbai between 1998 and 2006, during public meetings and protests across a wide range of issues. Sudhir was unwavering in his commitment to Maoism, upholding the torch of B.R. Ambedkar, and resisting Brahmanical fascism. He sought to bridge the philosophies of Marxism and Ambedkarism. With boundless energy, he waved the banner of liberation, becoming the backbone of the revolutionary democratic centre in Mumbai and Maharashtra. He dedicated himself ...

Why crucifixion is a comprehensive message of political journey for the liberation of the oppressed

By Vijayan MJ  Passion week is that time of the year when Christians all over the world remind themselves about the sufferings, anguish, pain and the bloody crucifixion that Jesus Christ took on himself, as part of his mission of emancipating the people and establishing the kingdom of god. The crucifixion was not just a great symbolism of the personal sacrifice of one person, but it was a comprehensive messaging of a political journey for the liberation of the oppressed; one filled with struggle, militancy, celebration of life, rejection of temptations, betrayals, grief, the long-walk with the cross, crucifixion and ultimately resurrection as a symbol of victory over the oppressors and evil. 

How Mumbai University crumbles: Not just its buildings

By Rosamma Thomas*  In recent days, the news from the University of Mumbai has been far from inspiring – clumps of plaster have fallen off the ceiling at the CD Deshmukh Bhavan, and it was good fortune that no one was injured; creepy crawlies were found in the water dispenser that students use to collect drinking water, and timely warning videos circulated by vigilant students have kept people safe so far.

CPM’s evaluation of BJP reflects its political character and its reluctance to take on battle against neo-fascism

By Harsh Thakor*  A controversial debate has emerged in the revolutionary camp regarding the Communist Party of India (Marxist)'s categorization of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Many Communists criticize the CPM’s reluctance to label the BJP as a fascist party and India as a fascist state. Various factors must be considered to arrive at an accurate assessment. Understanding the original meaning and historical development of fascism is essential, as well as analyzing how it manifests in the present global and national context.

Akhilesh Yadav’s boycott of Dainik Jagran: A step towards accountability or political rhetoric?

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat  Akhilesh Yadav has called for a total boycott of Dainik Jagran, a newspaper owned by the Gupta family. He also declared that the Samajwadi Party will no longer participate in any panel discussions organized by a media channel allegedly controlled by the family or relatives of the omnipresent Rajiv Shukla. Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party are well aware that Dainik Jagran has long been antagonistic to Dalit-Bahujan interests. The newspaper represents a Bania-Brahmin corporate and ideological enterprise.