Skip to main content

Apex Court exposes misuse of administrative power under the guise of bulldozer justice

By Vikas  Meshram* 
India's Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, has remarked that permitting such "bulldozer justice" would undermine the constitutional recognition of the right to property under Article 300A. This directive, issued on the eve of Justice Chandrachud’s retirement, emphasizes six essential steps that must precede any demolition, including proper surveys, issuance of written notices, and consideration of objections. The court also laid down that even for development projects, these six procedural steps must be adhered to before demolishing any property.
Firstly, authorities must verify existing land records and maps. Secondly, a proper survey must be conducted to identify actual encroachments. Thirdly, written notices must be issued to the alleged encroachers. Fourthly, authorities should consider objections and provide an opportunity for a hearing. Fifthly, reasonable time must be given for voluntary removal of encroachments. Lastly, if necessary, additional land must be legally acquired.
The Supreme Court strongly criticized the trend of unilateral and arbitrary "bulldozer justice," stating that threatening citizens with property destruction cannot suppress their voices. It emphasized that such actions, outside the ambit of law, are unacceptable and violate fundamental rights. The government must follow due legal process and provide individuals an opportunity to be heard before demolishing any property. If bulldozer actions are permitted, it would nullify the constitutional recognition of the right to property under Article 300A.
The court highlighted that arbitrary or illegal actions by authorities could lead to vindictive demolitions, jeopardizing the rights of individuals. In the specific case from Maharajganj district, Uttar Pradesh, where a journalist's house was unlawfully demolished in 2019, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, awarding interim compensation of ₹25 lakh and initiating disciplinary proceedings against the responsible officials.
The bench observed that destroying citizens’ homes or properties without following due legal processes cannot be justified. The court noted the state government's failure to produce any document verifying the original width of National Highway 730, which the demolition purportedly aimed to restore. It also found no evidence of proper surveys or demarcations marking the journalist’s house as encroached. This case exposed a pattern of abuse of power, which the court described as an example of state overreach.
This landmark ruling by the Supreme Court serves as a necessary check on the misuse of executive power. By halting so-called bulldozer justice, the court conveyed a clear message that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be arbitrarily trampled by the executive. Punishing individuals without a fair trial violates the concept of natural justice.
However, the court clarified that this ruling does not cover unauthorized constructions on government land or public spaces such as railway lines, footpaths, and roads. Still, it recognized the reality that illegal encroachments or constructions on public land do not occur overnight. Political backing and bureaucratic collusion often enable such acts, making it imperative for authorities to take timely and legal actions.
Moreover, the court underscored that any demolition must follow legal procedures and allow respondents to present their case. By delivering this balanced judgment, the Supreme Court has not only upheld constitutional values but also instilled public confidence in the judiciary.
In essence, this ruling reminds the executive of its limits and rejects the notion of officials acting as judges and executioners. The court exposed the misuse of administrative power under the guise of bulldozer justice, emphasizing that no public servant has the authority to punish anyone without trial.
The court also warned against collective punishment, noting that demolishing a person's home, built over a lifetime, within mere hours without a chance for objection is akin to lawlessness. To ensure accountability, the court directed that if any house is unlawfully demolished, the costs of reconstruction should be deducted from the salaries of the responsible officials.
However, the court maintained that the ruling does not apply to demolitions of illegal constructions on public property, such as roads or footpaths, as long as due process is followed. This ruling sets an example of judicial balance, fostering constitutional values in a democratic society over time.

Comments

TRENDING

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

A Marxist intellectual who dwelt into complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.

Four J&K MLAs visit Wular lake, pledge support to fisher community, environmental conservation

By Shamim Ahmed*   In a historic meeting that highlighted both environmental and social concerns, four Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) visited Wular Lake to meet with the fisherfolk community, signaling a significant step in addressing their longstanding issues. This gathering, organized with the support of dedicated advocates, marks a strengthening of efforts to both safeguard the lake’s ecosystem and support the community’s welfare.

Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India. The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covax...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

70,000 migrants, sold on Canadian dream, face uncertain future: Canada reinvents the xenophobic wheel

By Saurav Sarkar*  Bikram Singh is running out of time on his post-study work visa in Canada. Singh is one of about 70,000 migrants who were sold on the Canadian dream of eventually making the country their home but now face an uncertain future with their work permits set to expire by December 2024. They came from places like India, China, and the Philippines, and sold their land and belongings in their home countries, took out loans, or made other enormous commitments to get themselves to Canada.