Skip to main content

Birsa Munda: A true grassroots leader, acceptable to Adivasi masses of indigenous faith

By Joseph Bara* 
Birsa Munda, a late nineteenth century Adivasi freedom fighter of Chhotanagpur, represents the Adivasi shade in the variegated freedom struggle of India. Highly adored today by the Indian nation, his stature as a national hero has grown phenomenally in the last few decades. He is unusually honoured by two memorials in the Parliament of India, and his birthday, 15 November, is observed by the Government of India as ‘Janajati Gaurav Diwas’.  The President and the Prime Minister of India spare time to visit his birth-place to pay him homage.
Adivasis as Relentless Fighters 
The Indian freedom struggle was one of the longest in the colonial world, where Adivasis fought relentlessly from the beginning to the end, making them one of most noticeable protesting groups. As they resorted to armed struggle frequently, violence is seen as the Adivasi trademark. Violence was actually an act of desperation since authorities least cared to communicate with the Adivasis on their grievances. Adivasis, like others, employed other methods as well. The Mundas and the Uraons of Chhotanagpur and the Gonds of central India adopted Gandhian way of protest since the Non-Cooperation movement. Even Birsaites, violent earlier, became Gandhian. Much earlier, since 1858, the Mundas and the Uraons experimented with the constitutional method of agitation, i.e. by petitions, depositions and judicial cases, for four decades under the Sardari Larai movement.
Frustrated with constitutionalism ultimately, the Munda and the Uraon agitators reverted to violence under Birsa Munda-led revolt, called Ulgulan (1895-1900). Though violence-based, the Ulgulan had also a messianic face. Incidentally, the Ulgulan coincided with the mainstream nationalist struggle, led by Western educated elite under the Indian National Congress banner, standardizing petitioning to the British authorities as an agitation method. But the Adivasis had lost faith in it. A decade later, in 1910, the Ulgulan resonated in the Bhumkal of Bastar, another Adivasi heartland. 
While fighting by multifarious means, the Adivasis had their own vision for a disum or rule where the society would be just, free from dominance or exploitation. The protest moves were, therefore, premeditated and actions devised accordingly. In comparison to preceding protests in Chhotanagpur, Birsa Munda’s Ulgulan was a bigger outburst, indicating Adivasis’ accumulated anger. Birsa’s adroit leadership characterized it a concerted action. Besides moving tirelessly to convince the masses on the Adivasi cause and holding nocturnal meetings at strategic places, he organized three levels of loyal disciples.
Legacy in Essence
The Ulgulan lasted only five years. Adivasis’ fight by primeval means like bow and arrow did not stand the mighty British arms. Yet, it shook the colonial hold and sent a strong message to the authorities that the century-old Adivasi problem needed urgent redressal. A ‘thorough’ survey of land tenure holdings and related matters was ordered and, as ‘final’ settlement, a slew of colonial measures ensued, culminating in the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908, considered the Magna Carta of Adivasis’ traditional agrarian rights. In vogue even today, the Act signified a model measure for protecting the Adivasis elsewhere.
Birsa’s intervention gave a new twist to the Adivasis’ destiny. Though an illusion, the Adivasis believed that land issue was now settled. The settlement actually deprived them of most of their fertile land. The situation pushed the Adivasi mind to explore life beyond agriculture. Administrative expansion in Chhotanagpur and Bihari-Bengali wrangle over education-based employment sensitized the Adivasis for this option. Pressure was put on the government and the Christian missionaries to revamp education, hitherto restricted to middle schooling, which led to regeneration of the Adivasi society in the following years.  
Birsa Munda was a true grassroots leader, acceptable to Adivasi masses of indigenous faith, Hindu and Christian following. Beginning from the Munda belt of the present Khunti district and with Birsa’s religious agenda of healing and preaching, the Adivasis’ land issue, the mainstay of Adivasi cultural life, became the central cause and the Ulgulan spread far and wide among other Adivasi groups. Besides influenced by Christian teachings, popular Vaishnavite Hinduism and Adivasi belief swayed Birsa’s personality, which reflected in his leadership style and action.
Birsa framed his foes clearly. While Whiteman authorities and the missionaries, who informed them about Birsa’s activities, were the arch-enemies, the zamindars and their associates, called Dikus, were considered frontline agents of colonialism. Neo-Christian Adivasis, initially attacked as enemy missionaries’ minions, and ordinary non-Adivasis masses living in Adivasi villages were assured no harm.
Unfair History
Such significant role and legacy of Birsa Munda is poorly treated in history. For half a century since his demise in 1900, Birsa Munda was in the nation’s limbo. Only local Adivasis cherished his memory and admired his leadership and heroics for protecting them from British injustice. He appeared before the nation only in 1939-40, somewhat dramatically, afforded by the launching of Adivasi Mahasabha, an Adivasi movement for administrative autonomy of Chhotanagpur and Santhal Parganas, and the annual session of the Indian National Congress at Ramgarh (near Ranchi). The Adivasi Mahasabha invoked Birsa Munda as a cult figure to strengthen the Adivasi movement, whereas the Congress wanted to use him for expanding its base among the Adivasis.
The episode stirred historian’s curiosity on Birsa Munda. Within general neglect of Adivasis’ role in the freedom struggle, Birsa Munda is privileged. A volume by the Government of Bihar, K.K. Datta (ed) History of Freedom Movement in Bihar (1957), contained a chapter on Birsa Munda. The first by a historian, Datta’s chapter stoked detailed investigation in the life and work of Birsa Munda. The Bihar Tribal Research Institute conducted a study, resulting in the publication of Life and Times of Birsa Bhagwan by S.P. Sinha (1964). Another poetic title Dust-storm and the Hanging Mist: A Study of Birsa Munda and his Movement in Chhotanagpur by Suresh Singh (1966) followed, emerging from author’s doctoral study at the University of London.
These publications fixed the place of Birsa in the annals of freedom struggle of India. However, our knowledge and understanding of the persona of Birsa remains incomplete. The volume by Datta gives Birsa Munda an appendix treatment, sparing him only a tiny space. Datta, and Sinha likewise, attempt to dovetail Birsa’s role to the mainstream nationalist struggle, neglected so far and now impelled by the presence of assertive Adivasi voice, led by Jaipal Singh, in the national politics. The works essentially show Adivasi revolt in the mainstream nationalism’s shoe. Like in nationalist political consciousness, a forerunning socio-religious movement is fallaciously explained paving way for the Adivasi political move. The fact is that whatever socio-religious fermentation occurred in the Adivasi society was locally fashioned and intertwined with the protest sequences. 
Supported by a medley of local primary data, Suresh Singh’s The Dust-Storm and the Hanging Mist presents intimate details on Birsa’s life and the Ulgulan. It describes the uprising’s local origin and own direction, but abjures to put the subject on the anvil of historical critique. No attempt is made to relate it to the broader concept of nationalist struggle. This key question becomes pertinent since a stream of later scholarship either denies Birsa Munda the status of an anti-colonial freedom fighter, rating him instead only as a fighter for mundane agrarian rights of the Adivasis; or, while recognizing his nationalist face, estimates him as a leader of secondary importance.
Baseless Highlights 
The literary-type diction of Suresh Singh’s story elicited literati’s interest on Birsa Munda. Distinguished writer Mahasweta Devi was inspired to publish a Sahitya Akademi award-winning novel on Birsa, Aranyer Adhikar (in Bengali, Jangal Ke Dawedar in Hindi) (1977). Even film makers came forward to produce Birsa Munda documentaries. By the turn of twentieth century, Birsa was a prominent freedom fighter figure of the country. 
Meanwhile, even as he is a freedom fighter ideal, historiographical gap on Birsa Munda lingers. Later writings either iconize Birsa Munda or reiterate subordinate status of his role. In the first case, noted theorist historians, Michael Adas and Ranajit Guha, cite Birsa Munda case liberally to explain millenarianism and subaltern school respectively. This tweaks Birsa as an international historical figure. In the other case, historians first depict Adivasi protests as constituents of nationalist struggle and even commend the Adivasi agitators as pioneering and indefatigable. But soon they turn to question the Adivasi protest method and leadership quality and argue that Adivasi protests were in need of Congress model of coordination and stewardship. Adivasi protests, including Birsa’s Ulgulan, are, in other words, shown playing second fiddle to the mainstream freedom struggle. The stance stems from the prejudiced racist view of Adivasi people being backward sub-humans. 
Sandwiched between the two and hyped politically, today Birsa Munda is improperly appreciated. Various interest groups scramble to use the name as a political windmill. Historical facts are distorted blatantly for partisan ends, sullying Birsa’s salient persona as a secular mass leader. The earliest commentators described Birsa as a religious ‘fanatic’, and when first noticed by the mainstream nationalism at the time independence, he was portrayed as anti-Christian staunch Hindu. Somehow the tendency continues today. 
In reality, Birsa was not partisan. When the question of protecting the Adivasi land and society came, Birsa’s first followers were the Sardari Larai cadres, mostly neo-Christian Adivasis. Under Vaishnavite sway, Birsa was non-vegetarian and wore janeyu. But in 1898, he did not hesitate to sacrilege the Ram Temple of Chutia (Ranchi), the official shrine of the Maharaja of Chhotanagpur, at midnight. He did this for seizing a copper plate there, supposedly the Maharaja’s authority of zamindari in Chhotanagpur. Today, Birsa is recognized as a national hero, but, simultaneously, assigned a communal tag. The whole honour he receives day in, day out by the nation is, this way, hollowed.  
---
*Formerly with Jawaharlal Nehru University

Comments

TRENDING

Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan raises concerns over Jharkhand Adivasis' plight in Assam, BJP policies

By Our Representative  The Loktantra Bachao Abhiyan (Save Democracy Campaign) has issued a pressing call to protect Adivasi rights in Jharkhand, highlighting serious concerns over the treatment of Jharkhandi Adivasis in Assam. During a press conference in Ranchi on November 9, representatives from Assam, Chhattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh criticized the current approach of BJP-led governments in these states, arguing it has exacerbated Adivasi struggles for rights, land, and cultural preservation.

Promoting love or instilling hate and fear: Why is RSS seeking a meeting with Rahul Gandhi?

By Ram Puniyani*  India's anti-colonial struggle was marked by a diverse range of social movements, one of the most significant being Hindu-Muslim unity and the emergence of a unified Indian identity among people of all religions. The nationalist, anti-colonial movement championed this unity, best embodied by Mahatma Gandhi, who ultimately gave his life for this cause. Gandhi once wrote, “The union that we want is not a patched-up thing but a union of hearts... Swaraj (self-rule) for India must be an impossible dream without an indissoluble union between the Hindus and Muslims of India. It must not be a mere truce... It must be a partnership between equals, each respecting the religion of the other.”

A Marxist intellectual who dwelt into complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape

By Harsh Thakor*  Professor Manoranjan Mohanty has been a dedicated advocate for human rights over five decades. His work as a scholar and activist has supported revolutionary democratic movements, navigating complex areas of the Indian socio-political landscape. His balanced, non-partisan approach to human rights and social justice has made his books essential resources for advocates of democracy.

Four J&K MLAs visit Wular lake, pledge support to fisher community, environmental conservation

By Shamim Ahmed*   In a historic meeting that highlighted both environmental and social concerns, four Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) visited Wular Lake to meet with the fisherfolk community, signaling a significant step in addressing their longstanding issues. This gathering, organized with the support of dedicated advocates, marks a strengthening of efforts to both safeguard the lake’s ecosystem and support the community’s welfare.

Supreme Court’s dismissal of PIL on Covid vaccine safety is counter to known science and mathematics

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 14 Oct 2024, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. In 2021, the world saw the rollout of various Covid vaccine candidates. In India, Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin and Serum Institute of India’s Covishield were rolled out. Covishield was nothing but Oxford’s AstraZeneca relabelled in India. The importance of open-minded and scientific probe of Covid vaccine safety In 2020/2021, all Covid vaccines were authorized for emergency use, which meant that the necessary efficacy and safety follow-up was incomplete at that time. The originally approved trials – called randomised controlled trials (RCT) had a “vaccine” group and a “placebo” group for comparison. Such experimental comparison/control is the cornerstone of the scientific method – which even children learn in photosynthesis experiments in class-1. The vaccine trials were scheduled to conclude in late 2022/early 2023. For instance, Covax...

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah  The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Right-arm fast bowler who helped West Indies shape arguably greatest Test team in cricket history

By Harsh Thakor*  Malcolm Marshall redefined what it meant to be a right-arm fast bowler, challenging the traditional laws of biomechanics with his unique skill. As we remember his 25th death anniversary on November 4th, we reflect on the legacy he left behind after his untimely death from colon cancer. For a significant part of his career, Marshall was considered one of the fastest and most formidable bowlers in the world, helping to shape the West Indies into arguably the greatest Test team in cricket history.

70,000 migrants, sold on Canadian dream, face uncertain future: Canada reinvents the xenophobic wheel

By Saurav Sarkar*  Bikram Singh is running out of time on his post-study work visa in Canada. Singh is one of about 70,000 migrants who were sold on the Canadian dream of eventually making the country their home but now face an uncertain future with their work permits set to expire by December 2024. They came from places like India, China, and the Philippines, and sold their land and belongings in their home countries, took out loans, or made other enormous commitments to get themselves to Canada.