Skip to main content

Govt of India's attempt to revive unpopular reforms contained in the repealed farm laws

By Dr. Rajinder Chaudhary & Kavitha Kuruganti* 
The Draft National Policy Framework on Agricultural Marketing, released by the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare on November 25, 2024, raises critical concerns for the future of Indian farmers. While the framework ostensibly aims to address the complexities of agricultural marketing, a closer examination reveals a concerted push towards de-regulation, leaving farmers vulnerable to corporate exploitation. This article provides an in-depth critique of the proposed policy and highlights its significant shortcomings.
1. Undermining Federalism and Farmer Participation
The draft acknowledges that agricultural marketing is a state subject under the Indian Constitution (Entry 18, List II, Seventh Schedule). However, contrary to its federal obligations, the Union Government has bypassed state governments in drafting this framework. Widespread consultations with state governments and farmer organizations should have been the foundation of this policy, but there is little evidence of such engagement.
2. Lack of Emphasis on Market Regulation
The policy’s silence on the regulation of agricultural markets is troubling. Effective regulation, supported by government oversight, is critical to prevent exploitation and ensure fair competition. The absence of this focus suggests a backdoor reintroduction of the repealed farm laws, which were widely opposed by farmers.
3. Ignoring Legal Guarantee of MSP
The demand for a legal guarantee of Minimum Support Price (MSP) has been a long-standing plea from farmers across India. However, the draft completely disregards this essential demand, undermining the stated vision of ensuring fair prices for farmers.
4. Insufficient Support for Infrastructure Development
While the framework stresses institutional reforms, it fails to provide clear commitments or financial support from the Union Government to bridge the significant gaps in marketing infrastructure. States cannot shoulder this responsibility alone, and the draft falls short in offering viable solutions.
5. Omissions on International Trade Policies
India’s international trade policies, including unpredictable export bans and reduced import duties, often harm farmers. The draft overlooks these critical issues, which are essential for protecting domestic agriculture. There is no commitment to align trade decisions with farmer welfare, nor is there any consideration of the implications of upcoming free trade agreements.
6. Failure to Address Data and Regulatory Gaps
The draft rightly identifies data unavailability in unregulated markets as a key issue. However, it offers no concrete measures to address these gaps. Promoting unregulated private markets without oversight exacerbates the problems, leaving farmers without protection.
7. Overlooking Evidence from Direct Market Models
The draft superficially acknowledges the lack of infrastructure for direct farmer-to-consumer markets but fails to draw on successful models like Rythu Bazaars in Andhra Pradesh. Evidence shows that investment in such infrastructure significantly benefits farmers, yet the policy lacks concrete proposals in this direction.
8. Inadequate Support for Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)
The framework’s focus on value chain-centric infrastructure does not prioritize Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) as central to these initiatives. Primary processing alone has proven insufficient for meaningful farmer benefits, yet this remains the policy’s limited approach.
9. Missed Opportunities in Organic Marketing
The policy mentions marketing organic produce but fails to propose segregated infrastructure or traceability systems essential for a robust organic supply chain. It shifts the entire responsibility to state governments without specifying how the Union Government will support this important initiative.
10. Revival of Repealed Farm Laws
Several provisions in the draft mirror the repealed farm laws, such as promoting private markets, deregulation of perishables, and direct purchase by corporations at the farm gate. These proposals ignore the resistance these laws faced, underscoring the policy’s intent to revive the same agenda through alternative means.
11. Questionable Reform Committee Proposal
The suggestion to form an “Empowered Agricultural Marketing Reform Committee” akin to the GST Council appears to be a tool to coerce states into compliance with Union Government policies, undermining genuine federal cooperation.
12. Skewed Focus on Ease of Doing Business
The draft prioritizes an index for “ease of doing agri-trade” but does not propose a similar mechanism for creating farmer-centric markets. This approach places corporate interests above farmer welfare.
13. Promotion of Contract Farming
The policy’s promotion of contract farming echoes provisions of the repealed farm laws. This move, resisted by farmers for undermining their interests, raises serious concerns about the government’s intentions.
Conclusion
The Draft National Policy Framework on Agricultural Marketing represents an attempt to revive the unpopular reforms contained in the repealed farm laws. It disregards the constitutional role of states, fails to address critical farmer demands such as a legal MSP guarantee, and neglects international trade issues affecting Indian agriculture. The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA-Kisan Swaraj) strongly urges the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers’ Welfare to withdraw this draft and initiate genuine consultations with all stakeholders to create a truly farmer-centric policy.
---
*Co-Convenors, ASHA-Kisan Swaraj. This article is based on the authors' representation to Surendra K Singh, Dy. Agriculture Marketing Adviser and Convener of Drafting Committee, Department of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare Government of India.

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a déjà-vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.
Post a Comment
Read more

The WHO Pandemic Agreement: Why India should reconsider its stance

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  For more than the past three years, the WHO has been trying its best to push the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations in unholy haste, instead of conducting a proper appraisal of the impact of the measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic—a routine exercise after any pandemic to guide future strategies.  This raises questions about whether the WHO, under China’s influence, is trying to conceal its acts of omission and commission during the pandemic, including obstructing investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The WHO recently faced a setback when the USA decided to cut all ties with the organization. 
Post a Comment
Read more

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker  The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.
Post a Comment
Read more

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.
Post a Comment
Read more

Killed in Chhattisgarh encounter, this Maoist leader suffered from overreliance on military actions

By Harsh Thakor*  Namballa Keshava Rao, also known as Basav Raj, General Secretary of the banned CPI (Maoist), was killed in an encounter in which 27 Maoist cadre died during a security operation in the Abujhmad forest, Narayanpur district, Chhattisgarh, on the morning of May 21. This marks the first time in the history of the CPI (Maoist) that its General Secretary has been killed in an encounter. Rao is the second General Secretary after Charu Mazumdar to be killed by security forces.
Post a Comment
Read more

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

By Rajiv Shah  A new report by  Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the  Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."
Post a Comment
Read more

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur*  Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.
Post a Comment
Read more

Ninety years of the socialist movement in India: What's the path head

By Dr. Sunilam*  We are all aware of what the leaders active in the socialist movement have accomplished over the past 90 years. We are also well-acquainted with the sacrifices made by leaders and workers during the freedom struggle and the socialist movement. For the past 45 years, since I became interested in joining the socialist movement as an activist, I have been keen on understanding and analyzing its history. Inspired by 101-year-old freedom fighter Dr. G.G. Parikh and in collaboration with comrades from the Socialist Samagam, I have actively participated in organizing events to mark the 82nd, 85th, and now the 90th anniversaries of the socialist movement.
Post a Comment
Read more