Skip to main content

Parliamentary discussion on Indian Constitution: A missed opportunity for introspection

By Vikas Meshram* 
On the occasion of the 75th year of the implementation of the Indian Constitution, a four-day discussion was held in both Houses of Parliament. This was a golden opportunity for introspection. While drafting the world's largest written Constitution, our founding fathers deliberated on every word and article with utmost seriousness. This was an opportunity to revisit and reflect on the values embedded in our Constitution. The discussion should have focused not only on the structure of the Constitution but also on the progress of our nation, the success of its implementation, and the development of our democracy. Unfortunately, the essence of the discussion was completely lost, and it ended up being limited to personal accusations and counter-accusations.
The Indian Constitution is not just a written document; it is a vital charter of the principles, values, and goals of our nation. The values of "equality, liberty, justice, and fraternity" enshrined in the Preamble are not mere words; they should be reflected in every aspect of our national life. Our Constitution established a secular democratic republic. Beyond caste, religion, gender, language, and economic status, citizens must experience equality, liberty, and justice. But in the past 75 years, to what extent have we realized these values? Have we created an ideal model of accepting and respecting our differences? Have we overcome the past challenges of caste discrimination, religious tensions, and economic inequality? It was imperative to address these questions. However, instead of confronting these issues, the parliamentary debate devolved into political maneuvering.
Parliamentary discussions are supposed to be a platform for intellectual exchange. They serve as a medium for addressing national problems and suggesting solutions through deliberation. However, the quality of debates in recent times has been deteriorating. Personal accusations, political jibes, and criticisms have become the defining characteristics of parliamentary discussions. The debate held on the 75th anniversary of the Constitution was no exception. Both the ruling party and the opposition used this platform to further their political agendas. Instead of revisiting the principles and goals of the Constitution, the discussions resembled election rallies. The ruling party focused on exposing the opposition’s past mistakes, while the opposition spent time criticizing the policies of the government.
During the drafting of the Constitution, India was grappling with severe challenges such as Partition, religious strife, social fragmentation, and economic disparities. Despite these circumstances, the Constitution's architects chose the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity to unify the nation.
Visionaries like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Purushottam Das Tandon, and Alladi Krishnaswamy Ayyar contributed to its drafting. Despite differences of opinion, they set aside their disagreements to develop a collective vision for the nation. They embraced the ideals of equality and social justice, ensuring that every citizen, regardless of religion, caste, gender, or language, would have equal opportunities. However, today, our political debates glaringly lack their vision.
The 75th year of the Constitution’s implementation was a chance for us to introspect. Have we made proper use of the rights granted by the Constitution? Have we fulfilled our duties as citizens? Has public participation in democratic processes increased? These are questions that should have been addressed. Parliamentary debates could have provided a meaningful platform for introspection. Instead, these discussions were marred by personal accusations and counter-accusations. Political parties wasted time pointing out each other’s flaws but lacked the courage to acknowledge their own shortcomings.
Leaders must not limit their respect for the Constitution to mere oaths. They bear the responsibility of embodying its principles through their actions. They must take initiatives to ensure freedom, equality, and justice for all citizens.
Political parties need to move beyond electoral politics and focus on national interest. The debates should transcend personal criticism and blame games to formulate actionable strategies for the nation's progress and the realization of constitutional goals. The Constitution sets forth the ideal of fraternity, but today's scenario shows that we are straying from it. Social inequality persists due to divisions based on religion, caste, and language, often exacerbated for political gain. Fraternity must not remain confined to speeches but should be demonstrated through actions. Every citizen must internalize the value of fraternity and foster a sense of unity.
Parliamentary debates should not be restricted to verbal sparring. Discussions must be idea-centric, focusing on national problems and their solutions. By studying the thought processes of the Constitution’s framers, we can chart a path for national progress aligned with their vision.
Both the ruling and opposition parties must engage in respectful dialogue during parliamentary debates. These discussions should not be limited to political accusations and counter-accusations. Respecting the Constitution means embodying its principles in practice. Mere speeches or declarations will not suffice. Strengthening democratic processes and fulfilling constitutional objectives require proactive efforts.
Understanding the spirit of the Constitution and striving for national progress is every citizen’s duty. The Constitution is not just the philosophy of a single nation; it is an inspiring ideology that sets an example for the entire world.
The 75th anniversary of the Constitution was an opportunity for introspection, but it was squandered. Neither the ruling party nor the opposition made proper use of this occasion. The Indian Constitution has provided us with the ideals of fraternity, equality, and justice. These ideals should not remain confined to speeches; we bear the responsibility of realizing them through action. Translating the Constitution’s values into practice and paving the way for the nation’s progress is the true tribute to our Constitution.
---
*Senior journalist

Comments

TRENDING

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a déjà-vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker  The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.

जैविक जीवित संसाधनों व प्रकृति पर निर्भर मजदूरों की व्यापक आर्थिक सुरक्षा कैसे हो?

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  भारत में  60 करोड़ से अधिक लोग भूमि, जल, जंगल और समुद्र जैसे प्राकृतिक स्रोतों पर निर्भर हैं । देश में 14.6 करोड़ छोटे और सीमांत किसान, 14.4 करोड़ खेतिहर मजदूर ( बड़ी संख्या में दलित हैं), 27.5 करोड़ वन निवासी, 2.8 करोड़ मछुआरे, 1.3 करोड़ पशुपालक और 1.7 करोड़ कारीगर हैं जो सीधे तौर पर  प्रकृति के साथ और प्रकृति के भरोसे काम कर रहे हैं । लगभग 6 करोड़ मौसमी मजदूर हैं जो काम के सिलसिले में लगातार अपने गांव से बाहर जाते हैं और लौटते हैं। प्रकृति निर्भर समुदायों की आर्थिक गतिविधियां जो बड़े पैमाने पर जीवन निर्वाह और छोटी आय के लिए है। वर्तमान आर्थिक नीतियों के कारण, जो कॉर्पोरेट्स और बड़े व्यवसायों का समर्थन करती है, प्रकृति निर्भर समुदाय के लिए अव्यवहारिक होती जा रही है। 

राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी: जल जीवन मिशन के लक्ष्य को पाने समन्वित प्रयास जरूरी

- राज कुमार सिन्हा*  जल संसाधन से जुड़ी स्थायी समिति ने वर्तमान लोकसभा सत्र में पेश रिपोर्ट में बताया है कि "नल से जल" मिशन में राजस्थान, मध्यप्रदेश, पश्चिम बंगाल, झारखंड और केरल फिसड्डी साबित हुए हैं। जबकि देश के 11 राज्यों में शत-प्रतिशत ग्रामीणों को नल से जल आपूर्ति शुरू कर दी गई है। रिपोर्ट में समिति ने केंद्र सरकार को सिफारिश की है कि मिशन पुरा करने में राज्य सरकारों की समस्याओं पर गौर किया जाए। 

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur*  Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.

21-day security operation targets Maoist presence, prompts questions on civil impact

By Harsh Thakor*  Union Home Minister Amit Shah has described a recent counter-insurgency operation along the Chhattisgarh-Telangana border as a significant achievement for Indian security forces in their efforts against Maoist groups. The three-week-long operation in the Karreguttalu Hills reportedly resulted in the deaths of 31 individuals identified as members of Maoist formations.

Civil society group voices concern over government response to Pahalgam attack

By A Representative  Citizens for Democracy (CFD), a civil society group, has expressed serious concern over the government's response to the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. While unequivocally condemning the violence, CFD raised alarm about what it sees as an excessive and politically motivated reaction by the authorities. CFD acknowledged the widespread condemnation of the attack from all sections of society, including strong protests led by local Kashmiri Muslims. However, it criticized the government for failing to provide a transparent account of the security lapses that allowed the attack to occur. It also noted the absence of a clear plan for accountability or a high-level inquiry into the incident. The group questioned the initiation of Operation Sindoor, describing it as a move driven more by domestic political considerations than strategic necessity. CFD warned that such military actions risk long-term instability and divert attention from peaceful an...

Chicago varsity adds Ambedkar’s writings to library, strengthens global academic access

By A Representative  The University of Chicago has accepted 20 volumes of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar's Writings and Speeches (BAWS) at the Harper Library on May 15, 2025. This historic donation, facilitated by the Ambedkar Association of North America ( AANA ), marks a significant milestone for Ambedkarite communities across the USA and Canada, furthering their mission of promoting Dr. Ambedkar’s legacy and advancing educational accessibility.