Unclear whether Trump has conducted a realistic SWOT analysis for the USA: America First policy

By N.S. Venkataraman*
It is an indisputable fact that the USA has remained a superpower for several decades and continues to hold that position. This dominance is attributed to its vast landmass, abundant natural resources—including crude oil and natural gas—a robust agricultural base, and remarkable achievements in science and technology.
The USA’s success has also been facilitated by its willingness to welcome talented individuals from across the globe. Even today, people from various countries aspire to migrate to the USA, attracted by the freedom it offers, its proactive work culture, a liberal democratic setup, and societal affluence.
While the USA has its share of shortcomings, its positive attributes are overwhelming. Other nations, such as Russia and China, may have similar resources and advantages, but the USA has uniquely harnessed its strengths for the country's benefit.
This is why US presidential elections are closely followed worldwide, more so than leadership changes in any other country. Even the announcements of cabinet appointments by Trump before his swearing-in as President were widely discussed globally.
Why Was Trump Overwhelmingly Voted to Power?
When Trump was re-elected as President with an overwhelming majority, many around the world were surprised. This was especially puzzling given the controversies surrounding him, including allegations of sexual assault, corruption, and the violent attack on Capitol Hill by his supporters after his defeat by Biden—a situation many believe Trump may have influenced. People began to question whether US citizens disregarded the lack of morals in their President's private and public life.
Some attribute Trump's victory to the negative votes caused by President Biden's perceived lackluster performance. Others believe Trump gained immense support due to his "America First" policy, promises to deport illegal migrants, and assurances to end conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Regardless, after taking office, Trump has stayed true to his image of prioritizing his agenda, even if it disrupts others, as long as it aligns with his "America First" philosophy.
How Will the World React to Trump’s America?
Trump has made several contentious statements, such as claiming the Panama Canal should belong to the USA, suggesting Canada could be an extended US territory, and proposing a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico. He also threatened to impose a 100% tariff on BRICS nations if they launched a parallel currency to challenge the dominance of the US dollar. Additionally, he has asserted that illegal migrants would be forcibly deported. These remarks are often seen as extreme and unbalanced.
In this context, it is inevitable that countries worldwide may begin to perceive Trump as assuming that the USA has a divine right to police the world. If Trump continues to enforce his priorities globally—such as withdrawing from WHO and the Paris Climate Agreement—other nations are unlikely to remain passive. Governments may start strategizing on how to counterbalance "Trump’s America." While immediate strong measures are unlikely, this line of thinking will persist.
Countries like Russia, China, and Iran, which already despise the USA’s perceived superiority complex, and certain extremist groups might pose threats to Trump's America.
Is This Due to a Lack of SWOT Analysis?
It is unclear whether Trump has conducted a realistic Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis for the USA. His "America First" policy appears to reflect a belief in US dominance over global affairs, but has he adequately considered the risks and mitigation strategies?
While the "America First" policy is not inherently flawed, the question remains: Should this policy come at the cost of offending other nations? Even discerning Americans may begin to ponder this. Deporting illegal migrants, for instance, is a highly sensitive issue. These individuals entered the USA due to past administrations' lack of scrutiny, and many have since become law-abiding residents. Critics may view such deportations as inhumane, particularly since some American companies rely on the low-cost labor they provide.
The "America First" policy has the potential to strengthen America’s global standing, but it should not result in "cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face"—an act that harms both others and oneself.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

King Corona and his descendents: How long will the Dynasty last?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* “Corona ” is in the media once again, precipitating a déjà-vu feeling and some amount of panic among the people. Among viruses and microorganisms King Corona and its descendents enjoy Royalty Status. "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet." This classic quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is well known. But does it hold well in current times? The events during the past five years challenge the Bard's view.

The WHO Pandemic Agreement: Why India should reconsider its stance

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* For more than the past three years, the WHO has been trying its best to push the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations in unholy haste, instead of conducting a proper appraisal of the impact of the measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic—a routine exercise after any pandemic to guide future strategies. This raises questions about whether the WHO, under China’s influence, is trying to conceal its acts of omission and commission during the pandemic, including obstructing investigations into the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The WHO recently faced a setback when the USA decided to cut all ties with the organization.

Old bias, new excuses: How western media misrepresents India’s anti-terror strikes

By Gajanan Khergamker The recent Indian military strikes on Pakistan, dubbed Operation Sindoor, have sparked a storm of international media coverage. Several prominent outlets have portrayed India as the aggressor in the escalating conflict, raising concerns over biased reporting. This commentary critiques coverage by foreign media outlets such as The New York Times , Reuters, BBC, and CNN, which have often been accused of framing India’s actions as escalatory while downplaying or omitting critical context regarding Pakistan’s role in fostering terrorism. By examining historical patterns and current geopolitical dynamics, this analysis highlights the recurring selective framing, omission of evidence, and a tendency to favor narratives aligned with Western geopolitical interests over factual nuance.

India’s 2021 excess deaths: was it the virus — or the containment frenzy?

By Bhaskaran Raman* Tyagu (name changed), a vegetable vendor recalls of his brother’s death in 2021. The victim had a normal fever, but was forcibly taken away to the hospital saying that it was Covid. He had been coerced into taking the Covid-19 “vaccines” by that time. After 10 days in hospital, he died. There was no proper information during his hospital stay, and no one was allowed to visit, saying that visitors could also get Covid.

Killed in Chhattisgarh encounter, this Maoist leader suffered from overreliance on military actions

By Harsh Thakor* Namballa Keshava Rao, also known as Basav Raj, General Secretary of the banned CPI (Maoist), was killed in an encounter in which 27 Maoist cadre died during a security operation in the Abujhmad forest, Narayanpur district, Chhattisgarh, on the morning of May 21. This marks the first time in the history of the CPI (Maoist) that its General Secretary has been killed in an encounter. Rao is the second General Secretary after Charu Mazumdar to be killed by security forces.

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

By Rajiv Shah A new report by Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."

Crying air, water, and earth: A call to conserve our dying natural resources

By Dr. Gurinder Kaur* Air, water, and earth—these natural resources are essential for the survival of all living beings, including humans, animals, and plants. Life in any form is impossible without them. These are precious gifts of nature to humankind. However, in the pursuit of economic growth, modern humans have severely polluted these valuable resources in an attempt to satisfy their greed.

Ninety years of the socialist movement in India: What's the path head

By Dr. Sunilam* We are all aware of what the leaders active in the socialist movement have accomplished over the past 90 years. We are also well-acquainted with the sacrifices made by leaders and workers during the freedom struggle and the socialist movement. For the past 45 years, since I became interested in joining the socialist movement as an activist, I have been keen on understanding and analyzing its history. Inspired by 101-year-old freedom fighter Dr. G.G. Parikh and in collaboration with comrades from the Socialist Samagam, I have actively participated in organizing events to mark the 82nd, 85th, and now the 90th anniversaries of the socialist movement.

Search This Blog