Skip to main content

An artist is an artist... knows no religion

It was, I presume, 1981. MF Husain had put up an unusual exhibition, about which none now seems to remember. Critics had said he had gone "pop." Put up at Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi, the exhibits were, if I remember correctly, colour photographs he had clicked. There was, perhaps, some collage work in the exhibits, too. A young journalist with Link weekly, I dashed into Husain and asked him for an interview, to which he readily agreed. "Link is here, I will talk to you later, friends", he told those present, and we went and sat in his legendary black Fiat, which he had used as a canvas to paint on. Husain's "pop" realism had impressed me, especially a photograph which, I vaguely remember now, showed large number of film posters pasted on a well next to the railway station, with a cobbler or some other person down below doing his job.
While talking to Husain, it never occurred to me that I was interacting with a Muslim. In fact, belonging to an artists' family (my parents taught art education at the Faculty of Fine Arts for nearly 25 years at Jamia Millia Islamia), I always thought that an artist is an artist, he has no religion. One of our best family friends in my childhood was J Sultan Ali, a renowned artist, who used mythological images in his paintings. As a school-going child, I distinctly remember frequenting his house near Bhogal, at a place then identified as Nizamuddin Mod in Delhi, and how he used to pen his folk images. Animals, humans, trees, as if, jostled for space in the paintings he inked. I called his daughter Mumtazben and treated her as my elder sister. She was older by several years and studied in my school Sardar Patel Vidyalaya. I read somewhere recently that Ali - who bid adieu to Delhi and settled down in Cholamandal Artists' Village, Chennai in late 1960s - was a Gujarati Khoja. But I doubt my parents ever knew he was one.
Years have passed by since then. If one wishes to be heard that an artist has no religion, it appears, one has put extra effort to emphasize this aspect, whether it is Gujarat or Delhi. Though I have very little of artist in me, I was attracted to Nabibakhsh Mansoori in Gandhinagar, where I am based now. Mansoori is a young and upcoming painter who has held successful exhibitions of his oils in most parts of India, and abroad. Some of his paintings have used mythical images of Radha and Krishna. I can see a change in me, decades later. When I talk to him, frankly, I have to keep in mind that I am talking to a Muslim who is using Hindu images. "No, they are not Krishna and Radha per se", he tells me, smiling. "I have used them as ordinary humans in real life. The image of Krishna symbolizes the ordinary shepherd in our villages", he adds.
Indeed, we live in a divided world, more divided than three decades ago. If a Muslim artisan makes portraits of Hindu deities, he is considered "secular". That is supposed to be the artisan's credential of being part of the so-called mainstream. If Husain paints Indira Gandhi in the image of Durga, it is a great work of art. But the moment he creates his own personal image of Saraswati, it is supposed to be a sacrilege. Extremists destroy the painting calling it a "Muslim" painter's indecency, an attack on "Hindu culture", a natural reaction to an immoral act. Even the then political leadership condoned the event, which took place in late 1990s. In its extreme form, the so-called Newtonian "action-reaction theory" was revived in 2002 by the perpetrators of the Gujarat riots. And, The Times of India wrote extensively on it.
Husain is no more. Mansoori, who has met him several times, in Ahmedabad, Mumbai and London, is obviously sad that one of his mentors has passed away. Mansoori is a man of few words. He doesn't talk much, except art. The last time Mansoori met Husain was six years ago, in Mumbai. Aware that it was a question being posed to an artist who is supposed to be a Muslim, I ask Mansoori what he thought of the dastardly attack on Husain's work. "I posed the question to Husainsaheb once. The answer was quite straight. He told me, we should look forward, not backward. We must keep working, without thinking about what had happened. Then we talked on many things, art, artists, everything, but didn't recall the event", says Mansoori. There is reason to wonder. Why couldn't one allow the artist to use his freedom for himself and look forward, without calling him words? Artist is an artist, not a political animal. He has nobody to defend when his work is attacked.
A college friend, Biswaroop Das, who is professor at the Institute of Social Studies, Surat, had a chance meeting with an "old man" who had put up exhibition at the Jehangir Art Gallery in Mumbai in late 1970s. "I was told by a friend who accompanied me to the gallery to talk to the white bearded person. I thought why not, as his exhibition was on display. I didn't understand the paintings, so this man explained his paintings. The person talked to me, a complete novice in art, for about an hour, without any hitch. We also had snacks together, and parted company.
Before parting, he asked me how did I find the exhibits, and I said it was fine, though I didn't understand much of it. Coming out of the exhibition, I asked my friend who this person was. 'MF Husain, damn it', this friend declared. My mouth was wide open, I couldn't utter a word. He was so down to earth!", Das recalls.


Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.