Skip to main content

About Rajiv

Former political editor of the Times of India, as representative of the paper in Gandhinagar, Gujarat’s capital, Rajiv Shah has covered the state government between late 1997 and early 2013. In formal journalism since 1979, he believes in what George Orwell said, "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations." 
Before Rajiv joined TOI in 1993, he was in Moscow, covering Mikhail Gorbachev's rise and fall between 1986 and 1993 for Delhi's semi-Left daily Patriot and Link newsweekly. 
Though ideologies have fascinated Rajiv, he feels, in the changed scenario, they are losing ground. And when someone asks him, what is replacing ideologies, he just has one answer: "I am a newsperson, How do I know?"
On being appointed as political editor, apart from doing routine news stories from Gandhinagar, he began writing blogs for the Times of India's online blogging  site in 2011. His column, which he continued till 2017, was called True Lies, where his TOI blogs can be still be accessed. They have been also been preserved here.
Some of the clippings during Rajiv's Link and Patriot days (1979-93) can be accessed here.
Many of his byline stories published in the TOI between 2001 and 2013, when he covered the Gujarat government under Narendra Modi as chief minister, can be accessed here and here. Post-2013, Rajiv has been editing Counterview.net, where he also writes blogs and news stories (click here to read).
The write-ups in this news blog are a modest attempt to bring forth impressions of the life around and efforts of the establishment to influence it.
Contact Rajiv here:  counterview.in@gmail.com

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...
Post a Comment
»

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?
2 comments
»

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.
Post a Comment
»