Skip to main content

Whose GIFT is it anyway?

Ever heard of a proposed location called Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT)? If you haven’t, you are either ignorant or you have actually missed out on grabbing a real opportunity. At least this is the conclusion one should draw after perusing through an authoritative presentation on the dream project of Gujarat’s No 1, chief minister Narendra Modi, dished out by his powerful propaganda machine.
Believe it or not, this high-level presentation on the proposed state-sponsored GIFT project declares that “85 per cent of Gujarat’s residents want to relocate to GIFT.” Interestingly, the presentation is quiet on which “Gujarat’s residents” it is talking about, where the survey was made, and by whom. As if this isn’t enough, it insists, “While only 24 per cent of non-residents (sic!) are willing to shift to Gujarat as a state, the percentage almost doubles (45 per cent) when it comes to shifting to GIFT.” Again, no sources have been quoted.
If you do not know what GIFT is about, then you’d better know it now – it is proposed on a 500 hectares land next to a river called Sabarmati, which is supposed to flow quietly along the state capital Gandhinagar, but is virtually dry as of today. Even as two out of 160 proposed high-rise towers are being built at the project site off the state capital across Sabarmati, plans are being worked out in the top state powerdom in Gandhinagar to fill up the Sabarmati portion next to GIFT with waters from the perennial Narmada, flowing about 250 kilometres down south, via the Narmada canal.
The presentation further wants one to believe that GIFT, proposed as an international financial services centre, will be the top thing in India, and the best in the world. Claiming that “GIFT will exceed ICT services of comparator cities”, it wants one to suppose that it is all set to beat flat all others, old and proposed – including Dubai International Financial Centre, South Korea’s Songdo International Business District, New York’s New World Trade Centre, London’s Canary Wharf, the Chinese Pudong which houses Shanghai Stock Exchange and World Financial Centre, Paris’ business district La Defense, Singapore, London Stock Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, and Tokyo.
The presentation’s ratings, in fact, show only GIFT as “Excellent” in every sector – “Overtaking” Place, Triple Play, Smart Buildings, Faster Setup, Competitive Service Provision, All Fibre, Mobile/ Wireless, Trading Platform and Data Centre. Quoting the source as British Telecom, the presentation says that all other “comparator cities” may have “Excellent” rating in several sectors, but certainly not in all. They are all dotted with “Poor” and “Reasonable” ratings, too. Only on one count – Sub-Sea Connectivity – our GIFT falters – it’s half “Excellent” and half “Reasonable”.
But the presentation is totally quiet about the rating of international financial centres, which is what GIFT is supposed to be. And, herein where the crux lies. While there is considerable reluctance to part with the complete feasibility report on GIFT, prepared by top consultants McKinsey & Company, whatever that has trickled down suggests where things stand for GIFT today.
The “demand assessment” by the consultants says that while all Indian cities lag far behind global financial centres, Ahmedabad’s ranking is No 8 even among Indian cities. On a scale of 10, existing international financial centres (IFCs) London, New York city, Frankfurt and Singapore have an average rate of 6.5, and emerging IFCs like Hongkong, Labuan, Seoul, Sidney and Dubai are rated on an average 5.4. India’s No 1 Mumbai is rated 3.2, followed by Delhi 2.8, Chennai 2.3, Kolkota 2.2, Bangalore, Pune and Hyedabad 2.1 each. Then comes Ahmedabad with 1.8 rating, followed closely by Chandigarh and Jaipur.
A year after Modi announced GIFT in 2007, a senior Indian Institute of Management (Ahmedabad) professor, who is a renowned expert in finance, told me that GIFT would be a “non-starter”, as nowhere has it happened in the world that a financial capital, once established, is shifted to some other place. “This has been tried with little or no success”, he said, adding, “In the age of ICT, office space is shrinking. You don’t need 500 ha for establishing a financial centre if you can do it in 15 ha.” He confirmed, GIFT was never discussed either with him or any other financial experts he knew.
GIFT’s plan was first floated by former chief secretary Sudhir Mankad during his tenure (2005-07). He previously was additional secretary, economic affairs, Government of India. With access to the well-known “Report of the High Powered Committee on making Mumbai an International Financial Centre”, authored by Percy Mistry, before it was submitted to the Ministry of Finance, Mankad – who is now GIFT chairman – reportedly gave its draft to Modi saying, “We must grab the opportunity ahead of Mumbai.”
Not without reason, Modi announced GIFT almost simultaneously when Mistry submitted the report in 2007. This was in conformity with the known Modi tactic of trying to strongly make his presence felt in the competitive world of Indian politics.
Since 2007, not much water has flown down the dry Sabarmati. GIFT land was handed over to IL&FS, the 50:50 partners in the project, for Re 1 in January 2011. While two towers are being built, there are yet no confirmed bookings, to quote a top GIFT executive. Meanwhile, senior government officials – mainly those who know financial issues – continue doubting GIFT’s financial feasibility. Their argument runs on lines similar to that of the IIM-A professor, and they insist, without compunction, that “GIFT will become a real estate haven, nothing more.” They scoff at the very idea of those at the top in Bandra-Kurla Complex in Mumbai shifting to GIFT, which is what the Modi government expects to happen.
Among others, former chief secretary D Rajagopalan, who previously served as additional chief secretary, finance, with the Gujarat government, has had his own doubts on GIFT. He and others know – GIFT or any other financial centre would have to heavily depend on financial reforms in the country, which is not in the state’s hands. Officials quote Rajagopalan (who is now Gujarat’s chief information commission) as asking his colleagues, junior and senior, in 2009, “Will GIFT ever be successful?” Referring to Rajagopalan, a senior official, occupying a key post, also quoted a top state-based tycoon as telling him, “GIFT is so off-the-mark. Even the location doesn’t excite.”


Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.