Skip to main content

Gujarat's development dilemma

Arvind Kejriwal
A few days back, I received an email from a non-resident Indian, working as an expert researcher in a US consultancy firm which provides different types of financial services. He said he was googling around on Gujarat development issues and chanced to see my story, based on analysis carried out by an IAS officer who retired as additional chief secretary, Gujarat government, CJ Jose. He was “helping out” Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in any possible way he could, and had followed Arvind Kejriwal’s visit to Gujarat closely. And, he had begun doing “some research” on the Gujarat development model, about which so much was being talked about. I am not revealing his name, as he asked me not to quote him.
Referring to my story, his email said, “I know Kejriwal has questioned Modi’s claims of more than 10 per cent agriculture growth, and has said Gujarat agriculture growth has been 1.18 per cent compound annual growth rate (CAGR), whereas you claim the growth to be 0.82 per cent. Could you please let me know where I could get the Gujarat agriculture data from so that I could do my own research? I went tohttp://agri.gujarat.gov.in/ (Gujarat agriculture department website) but couldn’t find any data there.”
I forwarded him another online story on Gujarat agriculture, based on the data provided to me by the state agriculture department, but not made public. It did not give any consolidated figure but suggested that between 2003-04 and 2012-13 Gujarat’s foodgrains production grew by 3.27 per cent per annum, cotton by 2.45 per cent, and oilseeds went down by (-) 2.71 per cent. The expert researched data online, and found that data till 2011-12 were available. But he again complained, he couldn’t get data for 2012-13. He wondered: “How did you get data from agriculture department? Did you file RTI?” I didn’t know what to say. Actually, I had obtained it from an official, who wanted the “latest real picture” to be made known.
The interaction with this researcher didn’t end here. I forwarded him a few more data on gross state domestic product (GSDP) of Gujarat, one of which said that, at current prices, Gujarat’s growth rate in 2012-13 was 13.98 per cent, based on which a Gujarat-based expert had guessed that the state’s real growth rate (at constant prices, after deducting inflation) wouldn’t be more than 7 per cent. The figure is based on advanced estimate in a budget document released in February 2013. I wondered, as the Gujarat government had still not released GSDP growth rate at constant prices, whether he could work it out.
His reply stunned me. He said: “The data you are using 13.98 per cent seems to be outdated.” These are based on Gujarat government’s fiscal responsibility report, which is “dated February 2013.” He added, “The GSDP of Gujarat was Rs 6,70,016 crore (at current prices) in 2012-13 as against 6,20,044 crore in 2011-12. That is a growth of 8.1 per cent (at current prices). The Rs 6,70,016 crore figure is from the Gujarat finance minister’s speech in February 2014. Also, I have Rs 6,20,044 crore figure for 2011-12 from the Wikipedia.” So, what would be the real growth rate of Gujarat, if it’s 8.1 per cent at current prices? Presuming the GDP deflator for Gujarat at 165.0, the real growth, he said, should be about 1.8 per cent!
Of course, he added a caveat: “Unfortunately, deflator is based on own judgment. Usually, it should be close to the consumer price index, but there has been divergence in the past. I read somewhere Gujarat inflation was below national average in 2012-13. Anyways, GDP deflator is known to be subject to manipulation by various governments. Given this is election year, I wouldn’t be surprised to see governments playing around with GDP deflator. Using a reasonable deflator of 165.0 (as against India’s 171.3), it seems real GDP growth (at constant prices) of Gujarat was not even be 2 per cent. Even if Gujarat plays around with deflator, real GDP growth doesn't look too good.”
I was left wondering: Why have experts in India, keenly debating Gujarat model, failed to see this simple fact? I decided to look at Gujarat finance minister Nitin Patel’s budget speech of February 2014, which had “proudly” proclaimed, “The GSDP (at current prices), which was Rs 1,11,139 crore in the year 2000-01, has increased to Rs 6,70,016 crore in the financial year 2012-13.” Indeed, the researcher was right. The Gujarat government had revised downwards its own estimate of GSDP for 2012-13 (at current prices) from Rs 6,97,298 crore to Rs 6,70,016 crore! I didn’t rely on Wikipedia figure for 2011-12, which mentions no source. I, instead, decided to refer to the current price GSDP data released by the Planning Commission.
What I got was this: Gujarat’s current price GSDP for 2011-12, according to the Planning Commission, was Rs 6,11,767 crore (as against Wikipedia’s Rs 6,20,044 crore). Gujarat was one of the three states which had not handed over their current price GSDP for 2012-13 to the Planning Commission – others being Kerala and Rajasthan. If one takes into consideration the state finance minister’s data of February 2014 – of Rs 6,70,016 crore GSDP in 2012-13 – the growth rate (at current price) would come to 9.52 per cent, as against the all-India average of 13.25 per cent. And this is the lowest compared to all major states!
This is the picture you get for other states (as reported by the Planning Commission) – Andhra Pradesh 13.83 per cent, Assam 13.45 per cent, Bihar 24.96 per cent, Chhattisgarh 14.82 per cent, Haryana 14.90 per cent, Himachal Pradesh 12.95 per cent, Jammu & Kashmir 12.72 per cent, Jharkhand 14.34 per cent, Karnataka 13.47 per cent, Madhya Pradesh 16.85 per cent, Maharashtra 14.43 per cent, Odisha 19.84 per cent, Punjab 13.88 per cent, Tamil Nadu 11.90 per cent, Uttar Pradesh 13.36 per cent, Uttarakhand 15.06 per cent, and West Bengal 16.89 per cent.
While it is not possible to know the real growth rate (at constant prices) in the absence of a reliable deflator, with 9.52 per cent of growth rate at current prices (lowest compared to all major states), there is reason to ask a pointed question: What has happened to the Gujarat model or its much-talked-about resilience to economic shocks and slowdown? What has happened to the strong “stabilizing influences” of Gujarat economy? And, if 2012-13 advanced estimates at current prices could be released in February 2013, why similar advanced estimates couldn’t be released in February 2014 while releasing the interim budget documents? It is because in 2013-14, again, Gujarat economy has performed badly?
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/gujarat-s-development-dilemma/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Rupani is a better choice as Gujarat CM, but is that enough?

You can be a frank and an approachable leader, but is that enough for you to solve social issues which bog society? Soon after Vijay Rupani became Gujarat chief minister on August 5 evening, a top Sachivalaya insider, whom I have known for more than a decade, phoned me up to know what people thought of “the new incumbent”. Hesitant, I told him that he knew Rupani for quite some time, in fact ever since Rupani was in the Rajkot Municipal Corporation, hence he should know better. Refusing to be named, he didn’t mince words, “Rupani is frank, approachable, dynamic”, adding, “It has always been a boon to work with him.”

Why Hindu rites make me recall theatre of absurd and Backet's Waiting for Godot

As I was student of English literature for five long years (1970-75), doing my BA (Hons) and MA course from Delhi University, I (quite like my classmates) never read anything about a term towards which I was to become fascinated in late 1970s -- theatre of the absurd – apparently because it was a French concept. Coined by critic Martin Esslin in his 1960 essay "Theatre of the Absurd", at that time I had only vaguely knew that it pertained to post-World War II plays written by European playwrights.

Why should one doubt 'popular' Soviet support to Nehru was spontaneous in 1955

A lot is being written on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Howdy event in Houston. Indeed, none can can deny it was a grand success, so much so that even Opposition Congress leaders have begun praising it. One of the most commented, adversely of course, is President Donald Trump calling Modi "father of India".