Skip to main content

CSR in Gujarat: A misguided view

It is titled “Small but Meaningful”, and is subtitled “CSR in Practice”. Authored by Maheswar Sahu, an influential Gujarat cadre IAS bureaucrat who retired as state industries secretary in 2014, who claims to be “instrumental” in organizing Narendra Modi’s high profile Vibrant Gujarat business summits of 2003, 2009, 2011 and 2013, the book has Jeevan Prakash Mohanty, a researcher at the Energy and Resources Institute, as the second author. While poor production and print quality may seem jarring, making many to believe it is over-priced (Rs 1,100), a peep into the book would provide one with an insight into how independently and analytically some of our high-profile bureaucrats have been thinking.
One of the claims of the book is, it offers “case studies” of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of 11 business houses in Gujarat. However, what strikes one most, as one glances through each of the case studies, is that Sahu and Mohanty accept whatever information is offered to them by the 11 business houses. There is no critical examination of any. There is no analysis, let alone in-depth, of what impact, if at all, these business houses may (or may not) have made through CSR.
In fact, the very second page of the book loudly proclaims that the “information on CSR Best Practices has been provided by 11 corporates”, that the “authors and publishers are not liable for the correctness and authenticity of the information” (sic!), and that “no specific criteria have been used to select the 11 case studies.” There is reason to ask: Given this factor, why select the 11 corporates’ CSR activities and call them “case studies”? Yet, ironically, the section of the case studies is called “Analysis of Best Practices”.
Those who have been “selected” all operate in Gujarat –MNCs Cairn and Hazira LNG (Shell), PSUs Gujarat State Fertilizer Company (GSFC), Vadodara, and Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Company Ltd (GNFC) (PSUs), and industrial houses Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Reliance Group, Adani Group, and Ambuja Cement. Then there are Setco Automotives and UPL Ltd (formerly United Phosphorous Ltd). No questions have been asked about their CSR activities. Nor is there any effort to answer the wide criticisms that have been leveled against a few of them for destroying or polluting environment, or depriving local people of means of livelihood.
Carrying a message by Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel and a foreword by top tycoon Ratan Tata, the authors insist on a wider “role” for the state, especially bureaucracy, in influencing CSR, in order to “encourage socially responsible business practices and create economic disincentives for irresponsible corporate behaviour.” In fact, they advise the state to “identify” a “robust mechanism for implementation of the projects sponsored by corporates.” How the state should go about doing this, despite a huge chapter on Defining” and Theorizing CSR”, however, has been left to the reader.
The chapter mentions Mahatma Gandhi’s trusteeship concept, but just in passing. While it does point towards how “Gandhi influenced industrialist’s approach towards society and argued that the wealthy should be trustees of wealth, using only what was necessary for personal use and distributing the surplus among the needy”, there is little effort to analyze its validity. In fact, it seems to be rejecting trusteeship as an old concept in just two sentences.
Sharply undermining it, the authors say, “Gandhi’s theory resonated strongly with the ideas of trusteeship expounded in England and the US in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, that later evolved into the concept of CSR.” Yet, in sharp contrast, at another place, the authors pay glowing tribute to Gandhi: “Industrialists GD Birla, Jamnadas Bajaj, Lala Shri Ram, and Ambalal Sarabhai, all believed in to be influenced by Mahatma Gandhi and his theory of trusteeship of wealth, contributed to Gandhi’s reform programmes, such as those targeting the situation of untouchables, women’s empowerment, and rural development.”
One is left wondering: If such was the Gandhian influence, why have the authors refused to elaborate? Or do they think that Gandhi wasn’t and isn’t important as far as CSR is concerned? Aren’t untouchability, women’s empowerment and rural development as relevant today as then? And why shouldn’t corporates involve civil society for these acivities?
There is a chapter on “The Rise of CSR and its Historical Context”, which ignores the history of CSR in India or Gujarat – pre-Independence or post-Independence. Of course, there is a sub-section of less than two pages, called “SCR in Contemporary India”, where the authors affirm that the history (before independence and till globalization) of business community’s “engagement and contribution to social development in India is not well documented”. Does it mean that lack of documents is enough reason not to give any details?
The chapter has no reference to how Gandhi may have tried to influence Gujarat’s and India’s renowned tycoons to act as “mahajans” of “trustees” of society at large, let alone analyze whether his effort bore any fruit. The authors merely say that in the post-globalization phase – i.e. after 1991 – the “corporates’ interest in social development was seen to be growing”, adding, they were “seen fulfilling social expectations.” Empty platitudes, one would say.
Yet the authors go on to add, indeed without any substantiation, “Indian companies are seen to be performing in non-financial arenas such as human rights, business ethics, environmental policies, corporate contributions, community development, corporate governance and workplace issues…” Is that so? Where exactly? And how?
On the other hand, seeking to trace CSR activities in the US and Europe, the authors give lavish details on what was the impact of industrial revolution on corporatism in the 19th century, the concept of corporate welfarism, the rise of unionism, the great depression, rise of CSR as a “concept” following the World War-II, impact of social movements such as those of Blacks on CSR, Milton Friedman’s intervention in 1960s calling CSR “anti-democratic” and “damaging to America’s freedom”, the impact of globalization on CSR, and the “global push” for CSR through international institutions.
At one point in the chapter, the authors say, “Socially responsible investment formally originated in the 1970s as an alternative investment option for investors that wanted to avoid stocks like tobacco, alcohol and, for some, oil”. Even here they do not recall how such initiatives took shape in India, even if they have not received the required publicity.
---

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.