Skip to main content

CSR in Gujarat: A misguided view

By Rajiv Shah
It is titled “Small but Meaningful”, and is subtitled “CSR in Practice”. Authored by Maheswar Sahu, an influential Gujarat cadre IAS bureaucrat who retired as state industries secretary in 2014, who claims to be “instrumental” in organizing Narendra Modi’s high profile Vibrant Gujarat business summits of 2003, 2009, 2011 and 2013, the book has Jeevan Prakash Mohanty, a researcher at the Energy and Resources Institute, as the second author. While poor production and print quality may seem jarring, making many to believe it is over-priced (Rs 1,100), a peep into the book would provide one with an insight into how independently and analytically some of our high-profile bureaucrats have been thinking.
One of the claims of the book is, it offers “case studies” of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities of 11 business houses in Gujarat. However, what strikes one most, as one glances through each of the case studies, is that Sahu and Mohanty accept whatever information is offered to them by the 11 business houses. There is no critical examination of any. There is no analysis, let alone in-depth, of what impact, if at all, these business houses may (or may not) have made through CSR.
In fact, the very second page of the book loudly proclaims that the “information on CSR Best Practices has been provided by 11 corporates”, that the “authors and publishers are not liable for the correctness and authenticity of the information” (sic!), and that “no specific criteria have been used to select the 11 case studies.” There is reason to ask: Given this factor, why select the 11 corporates’ CSR activities and call them “case studies”? Yet, ironically, the section of the case studies is called “Analysis of Best Practices”.
Those who have been “selected” all operate in Gujarat –MNCs Cairn and Hazira LNG (Shell), PSUs Gujarat State Fertilizer Company (GSFC), Vadodara, and Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Company Ltd (GNFC) (PSUs), and industrial houses Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Reliance Group, Adani Group, and Ambuja Cement. Then there are Setco Automotives and UPL Ltd (formerly United Phosphorous Ltd). No questions have been asked about their CSR activities. Nor is there any effort to answer the wide criticisms that have been leveled against a few of them for destroying or polluting environment, or depriving local people of means of livelihood.
Carrying a message by Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel and a foreword by top tycoon Ratan Tata, the authors insist on a wider “role” for the state, especially bureaucracy, in influencing CSR, in order to “encourage socially responsible business practices and create economic disincentives for irresponsible corporate behaviour.” In fact, they advise the state to “identify” a “robust mechanism for implementation of the projects sponsored by corporates.” How the state should go about doing this, despite a huge chapter on Defining” and Theorizing CSR”, however, has been left to the reader.
The chapter mentions Mahatma Gandhi’s trusteeship concept, but just in passing. While it does point towards how “Gandhi influenced industrialist’s approach towards society and argued that the wealthy should be trustees of wealth, using only what was necessary for personal use and distributing the surplus among the needy”, there is little effort to analyze its validity. In fact, it seems to be rejecting trusteeship as an old concept in just two sentences.
Sharply undermining it, the authors say, “Gandhi’s theory resonated strongly with the ideas of trusteeship expounded in England and the US in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, that later evolved into the concept of CSR.” Yet, in sharp contrast, at another place, the authors pay glowing tribute to Gandhi: “Industrialists GD Birla, Jamnadas Bajaj, Lala Shri Ram, and Ambalal Sarabhai, all believed in to be influenced by Mahatma Gandhi and his theory of trusteeship of wealth, contributed to Gandhi’s reform programmes, such as those targeting the situation of untouchables, women’s empowerment, and rural development.”
One is left wondering: If such was the Gandhian influence, why have the authors refused to elaborate? Or do they think that Gandhi wasn’t and isn’t important as far as CSR is concerned? Aren’t untouchability, women’s empowerment and rural development as relevant today as then? And why shouldn’t corporates involve civil society for these acivities?
There is a chapter on “The Rise of CSR and its Historical Context”, which ignores the history of CSR in India or Gujarat – pre-Independence or post-Independence. Of course, there is a sub-section of less than two pages, called “SCR in Contemporary India”, where the authors affirm that the history (before independence and till globalization) of business community’s “engagement and contribution to social development in India is not well documented”. Does it mean that lack of documents is enough reason not to give any details?
The chapter has no reference to how Gandhi may have tried to influence Gujarat’s and India’s renowned tycoons to act as “mahajans” of “trustees” of society at large, let alone analyze whether his effort bore any fruit. The authors merely say that in the post-globalization phase – i.e. after 1991 – the “corporates’ interest in social development was seen to be growing”, adding, they were “seen fulfilling social expectations.” Empty platitudes, one would say.
Yet the authors go on to add, indeed without any substantiation, “Indian companies are seen to be performing in non-financial arenas such as human rights, business ethics, environmental policies, corporate contributions, community development, corporate governance and workplace issues…” Is that so? Where exactly? And how?
On the other hand, seeking to trace CSR activities in the US and Europe, the authors give lavish details on what was the impact of industrial revolution on corporatism in the 19th century, the concept of corporate welfarism, the rise of unionism, the great depression, rise of CSR as a “concept” following the World War-II, impact of social movements such as those of Blacks on CSR, Milton Friedman’s intervention in 1960s calling CSR “anti-democratic” and “damaging to America’s freedom”, the impact of globalization on CSR, and the “global push” for CSR through international institutions.
At one point in the chapter, the authors say, “Socially responsible investment formally originated in the 1970s as an alternative investment option for investors that wanted to avoid stocks like tobacco, alcohol and, for some, oil”. Even here they do not recall how such initiatives took shape in India, even if they have not received the required publicity.



When phone tapping rumours were afloat in Gujarat among BJP leaders, IAS babus

Gordhan Zadaphia By Rajiv Shah While alerts were coming in over the last few days about a series of articles on how phones of “journalists, ministers, activists” may have been used to spy on them with the help of an Israeli project, Pegasus, finally, when I got up on Monday morning, I saw a Times of India story quoting (imagine!, we never used to do this, did just a followup in case we missed a story) the Wire, a top news portal on this providing some details, along with government reaction.

Gandhi Ashram 'redevelopment': Whither well-known Gandhi experts, Gandhians?

Sudarshan Iyengar, Ramchandra Guha By Rajiv Shah Rehabilitating about 200 families, mostly Dalits, living in the Gandhi Ashram premises by offering them Rs 60 lakh in order to implement a Rs 1,200 crore project called Gandhi Ashram Memorial and Precinct Development Project reportedly to bring the Ashram into its "original shape" as Gandhi established appears to me strange, to say the least.

Gandhi Ashram eviction: Finally historian Guha speaks out; but ageing trustees are silent

By Rajiv Shah Finally, at least one expert, top historian Ramachandra Guha, has spoken out on eviction of 200 families living in the Gandhi Ashram premises. Last week, I received an email alert from a veteran academic, Ashoke Chatterjee, former director, National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad, which happens to be one of the most prestigious academic institutes of India based, informing me about it. NID is one of the several top institutes founded when Jawaharlal Nehru was India’s Prime Minister.

Will Vaishnaw, close to Modi since Vajpayee days, ever be turnaround man for Railways?

By Rajiv Shah Ever since Ashwini Vaishnaw was appointed as railway minister, I was curious to know who he was and how did he come closer to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and, most important, when. Hence, I decided to talk with some Sachivalaya officials in Gujarat in order to find out if there was, if any, Gujarat (or Modi) connection.

Non-entity 6 yrs ago, Indian state turned Fr Stan into world class human rights defender

Jharkhand's Adivasi women  By Rajiv Shah A lot is being written on Father Stan Swamy, a Jesuit priest who is known more for his work for tribal rights in Jharkhand. His death at the age of 84, even when he was an under trial prisoner for his alleged involvement in the Bhima Koregaon violence three years go, has, not without reason, evoked sharp reaction, not just in India but across the world.

Home Ministry data vs Health Ministry data! Gujarat's poor sex ratio at birth data

Home minister Amit Shah, health minister Harsh Vardhan By Rajiv Shah Don’t India’s top ministries – of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) and of Home Affairs (MoHA) – tally data before releasing them? It would seem so… A few days back, I did a story in Counterview , based on an MoHA report, stating that Gujarat has the lowest sex rate at birth (SRB) at 901 girls as against 1000 births, followed by Assam (903), Madhya Pradesh (905) and Jammu & Kashmir (909), raising valid apprehensions that widescale female foeticide may be prevalent in India’s “model” State.

July 1: Observing communal harmony day in Ahmedabad, a highly segregated city

Activists at Vasant-Rajab memorial on July 1 By Rajiv Shah Celebrated as Communal Harmony Day in Ahmedabad, July 1, 2021 is remembered for the sacrifice of two friends, Vasant Rao Hegishte and Rajab Ali Lakhani, laid down their lives for the cause of communal harmony on the July 1, 1946 in the city. A memorial stands in their memory in Khandni Sheri, Jamalpur, Ahmedabad.

Periyar opposed imposition of alien culture on Dravidian people, but wasn't anti-Hindi

By  Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Thiru K Veeramani is the ideological disciple of EVR Periyar and one of the senior most leaders of the Dravidian movement at the moment. He started working under his mentor EVR Periyar at the age of 10 years when he delivered his first speech in Salem. Veeramani is President of Dravidar Kazhagam and editor of Modern Rationalist, a monthly journal devoted to Periyar’s ideas. That apart, he is editor of many other magazines and journals in Tamil. This interview was conducted by Vidya Bhushan Rawat at the Periyar Thidal on November 1st, 2019. These are some of the excerpts and the entire interview can be viewed at the youtube link being provided at the end of the article. Dravidian movement internationally Thiru Veeramani said that “It is high time that Periyar must be globalised now. He said that it was easier in relation to Dr Ambedkar since he has written in English and almost all the western audience read him through his work. But the southern part of India

Positive side of Vaishnaw? Ex-official insists: Give him loss making BSNL, Air India

By Rajiv Shah A senior chartered accountant, whom I have known intimately (I am not naming him, as I don’t have his permission), has forwarded me an Indian Express (IE) story (July 18), “Ashwini Vaishnaw: The man in the chair”, which, he says, “contradicts” the blog (July 17), "Will Vaishnaw, close to Modi since Vajpayee days, ever be turnaround man for Railways?" I had written a day earlier and forwarded it to many of my friends.

Gujarat cadre woman IAS official who objected to Modi remark on sleeveless blouse

By Rajiv Shah Two days back, a veteran journalist based in Patna, previously with the Times of India, Ahmedabad, phoned me up to inform me that he had a sad news: Swarnakanta Varma, a retired Gujarat cadre IAS bureaucrat, who was acting chief secretary on the dastardly Godhra train burning day, February 27, 2002, which triggered one of the worst ever communal riots in Gujarat, has passed away due to Covid. “I have been informed about this from a friend in Jaipur, where she breathed her last”, Law Kumar Mishra said.