Skip to main content

An alternative to reservation

Last evening, I was a little put off for a while. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-hand man, Amit Shah, and new Gujarat BJP chief Vijay Rupani (whom I had known as a relatively more suave politician among many of his ilk) told media that the Gujarat government would provide 10 percent reservation to dominant castes having income less than Rs 6 lakh.
It wasn’t reservation, already a contentious issue, which seemed to bother me immediately, as much as the figure, Rs 6 lakh. I wondered: Does it mean that a tax payer should be allowed reservation?
As expected, in his one-upmanship, Congress’ opposition leader Shankarsinh Vaghela, an ex-BJP man, came up with the demand to raise the reservation limit to 20 per cent, and the income limit to Rs 12 lakh! What he was demanding was simply amazing. Many class one officers of the Gujarat government, except a few in the IAS, would be “allowed” reservation.
I desperately searched for reaction. A scribe, who passionately covered the reservation roller coaster as a spot story, told me straight, “The BJP is rattled by what Vaghela’s statement” I was even more puzzled, but was left wondering…
What has gone wrong? While one can understand politics “determining” policy, is there no value of the need to study, or at least understand, as to who among the dominant castes should, if at all, get reservation? After all, who doesn’t know, even if driven by the then political considerations, there was a Mandal Commission, which studied what are called socially and economically backward classes (SEBCs) before providing OBC reservation.
And here we have a Patidar agitation, forcing a quick announcement – with an eye on the still far off Gujarat state assembly polls (December 2017) – about providing reservation to the so-called upper castes. It doesn’t need any great analytical insight to conclude that, while the BJP fears it would lose Patel support, Congress wants to cash on it.
This wasn’t for the first time that I came across a lurking gap between research and policy. The gap, if anything, has widened, to the point where our policy makers don’t think they need scholars to make them understand, on the basis of deep research, what should be done, and where, particularly when the issue at stake is reservation.
There is, of course, the view taken by many Gujarat-based academics, such as Prof Vidyut Joshi, a sociologist who headed the once-prestigious Institute of Social Studies, Surat, about what they call “collapse of academics”, more so in Gujarat than other places.
But here we have a situation where, even for the heck of it, the academics are not even consulted – forget studying the issue in depth – on what should be done for providing, if at all, reservation to the “upper” castes.
Not that they were consulted earlier. As Prof Samit Barua, ex-director, Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad and a top financial expert, told me once – the state government “never” consulted him on state finances. Things became worse as things passed. A Rs 6,000 plus crore project, Sujalam Sufalam, of having a recharge canal across North Gujarat’s non-Narmada command area, was implemented without any pre-feasibility or feasibility study.
Coming back to reservation, not that there is any dearth of ideas among researchers and activists with an academic bent of mind. As and when one talks of reservation in Gujarat, I am reminded of a closed door meeting in September 2014 in which a small group of academics and activists participated, in which perhaps I was the only “misfit”.
The discussion was “annihilation of caste”, taking the phrase from Dr BR Ambedkar. Scanning through the minutes of the two-day meeting, I found that the participants – who included Human Rights Watch’s Meenakshi Ganguly and top Gujarat-based social scientist Prof Ghanshyam Shah – agreed, among other things, about the need to have a “relook” at the reservation policy.
To quote from the minutes of the meeting, in which Dalit scholar Meera Velayudhan and Gujarat Dalit rights activist Manjula Pradeep were also present, there is a need to “address the issue of reservation” and work out an “alternative strategy based on vulnerability index, in which manual scavengers, especially women, are the chief focus of attention.”
“As of today, reservation, for all practical purposes, exists for those who have got assets”, the meeting seemed to agree, adding, “Government or semi-government reservation jobs are available for those Dalits who can ensure that their children study up to 10th or 12th standard. However, 90 percent Dalits do not have assets, are simply left out of the reservation policy.”
The minutes further said, the Dalits are “forced to migrate in search of jobs, they work in the informal sector, have no holidays, no health facilities, their children are forced to drop out of schools, and they are uncertain about their future.” The same is true of tribals, who have “lost all their natural resources”, thanks to the “capitalist” onslaught, it added.
Insisting on the need to go “beyond reservation”, it agreed that “it may be important to relook at reservation from the vulnerability framework, which will automatically include the schedule caste but will be more inclusive to others, thereby setting the stage for ‘annihilation of caste’.”
The meeting underscored, “there is a need to advocate for a vulnerability index in order to identify which sections or individuals require the fruits of reservation more than others…this vulnerability index.”
“Among manual scavengers”, the minutes said, “Women are more vulnerable, and their requirement for reservation would be even higher. Correspondingly, Dalit IAS or IPS officers’ share in reservation would not be as high as others.”
Further, “the vulnerability index would also bring out the plight of the nomadic tribes, adivasis, poor Muslims, migrants, victims of forced displacement because of internal violence. It would help bridge the gap that exists in the provision of entitlements between different sections.”
In a nutshell, the minutes said, “There is a need to have a vulnerability index to identify families/ groups/ communities for strategic intervention to change their socio-economic condition.” This vulnerability index would take care of those so-called upper caste persons who should be entitled to reservation, it suggested.
Of course, there exists what is called “a macroeconomic vulnerability index”, in order to gauge economic vulnerability of different countries. There is also a climate change vulnerability index, in order to identify “risks” to exposure to climate-related natural disasters, stress on natural resources, agricultural dependency, and adaptive capacity of a country’s to combat all of it.
Why can’t this be done for society and individuals? After all, none would have any objection to it. Of course, a deep research would need to be carried out. But if below poverty line (BPL) index can be worked out by indexing individuals’ capacity to spend, why can’t one take a step forward, having a social vulnerability index?
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/an-alternative-to-reservation/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.