Skip to main content

Gandhi Ashram eviction: Finally historian Guha speaks out; but ageing trustees are silent

Finally, at least one expert, top historian Ramachandra Guha, has spoken out on eviction of 200 families living in the Gandhi Ashram premises. Last week, I received an email alert from a veteran academic, Ashoke Chatterjee, former director, National Institute of Design (NID), Ahmedabad, which happens to be one of the most prestigious academic institutes of India based, informing me about it. NID is one of the several top institutes founded when Jawaharlal Nehru was India’s Prime Minister.
The email alert by Chatterjee, who is also associated with several NGOs, including Centre for Social Justice and Janvakas, quotes Guha, stating how the eviction drive by the Gujarat government in order to build a hi fi Gandhi memorial reflects the challenges faced by a Trust, which is said to look after the Gandhi Ashram, especially in view of the fact it is “composed of ageing men and women, who all live in Gujarat, and thus cannot speak out for fear that they or their families will be victimized by a government known for its vindictiveness.”
While the article by Guha, published in The Telegraph, suggests this ageing factor and refusal to speak out could be the reason why “the plans as forged by Modi and his cronies” to build a Gandhi memorial “will go ahead”, he does he not say who these “ageing” people are. Sudershan Iyengar, former vice-chancellor, Gujarat Vidyapeeth? Elaben Bhatt, current chancellor, Gujarat Vidyapeeth? Kartikeya Sarabhai, who is a descendant of the well-known scientist Vikram Sarabhai family, involved in NID project? Or someone else?
Be that as it may, at least Guha has finally spoken out. This follows my blog on this site two weeks ago, where I specifically mentioned Guha’s name among others for refusing to speak out against the eviction drive. Surely, he is not one of the trustees. Nor do I know whether he has written the The Telegraph piece after I mentioned his name with a photograph, though I apprehended this to Chatterjee, wondering whether Guha’s piece was “prompted by my blog” as it was “widely read”. Chatterjee was quick to reply: “It might well have. I don’t think Ashram group has seen this. I will share it with them immediately!”
Be that as it may, I am sharing here Guha’s article "Second Assassination" – which is surely a powerful commentary on the eviction move (all his commentaries are worth reading), though devoid of any new information. The commentary comes weeks after all 200 persons who live in the Gandhi Ashram premises have already accepted and signed the government offer of Rs 40 plus 20 lakh (total Rs 60 lakh) as compensation, or an alternative house. While some have begun accepting money, others are waiting to see if they can get a good house offered by the government.

Comments

  1. Modi is a supreme landscape designer and interior decorator . His own office in Gandhinagar was a room fit for a top corporat czar . Soon tiring of this , he got built a Swarnim Bhavan to house only Ministers . Naturally his was an exclusive floor . And offices to put the Ambanis and Tatas to shame . Gandhinagar had a redevelopment of a Central Vista project a work still in progress . And a Mahatma Mandir in 11 months . Contractors are a single agency L&T . Architect only Bimal . Mandirs destroyed in Varanasi to build an attractive approach to Kashi Vishwanath . Architect who else ? Who was the last person who destroyed Mandirs in Benaras ? Right Aurangzeb . He’s resurrected now !!!!
    Central Vista existing destruction and vandalised . Architecht only one . Violates all Govt procedures .
    Any further moves ? Yes , destroy the core values of Gandhi by making the Ashram a body without a soul . Exit Gandhi .
    Actually Sabarmati Ashram was vandalised in the riots of 1969 . Imam Manzil burnt . Read Hamid Kureshi Ordeal by Fire . Gujarat doesn’t have much loyalty to Gandhi
    Congress Govt headed by Hitendra Desai didn’t lift a finger to save the Ashram . Even though Governor Shriman Narayan desperately appealed to the IG Pavri and CM

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.