Skip to main content

How government guide misguided people about ASI-controlled historical site Modhera

I visited Modhera, a historical site of abandoned sun temple, built in the 11th century, the other day with family friends who had come from New Jersey. Situated about 100 from Ahmedabad, I got interested in how the expert guide had sought to identify its destruction.
The guide insisted (he claimed to have been certified by the government), the temple was destroyed first by Mahmud of Ghazni and then by Alauddin Khilji, though there seemed to be little expert confirmation -- quite unlike the Somnath temple, about which a Gujarat government site points how it was destroyed 17 times over, including by Mahmud of Ghazni in the 1299 century and then by Aurangzeb in 1706.
Though it is essentially an abandoned sun temple, protected by the Archeological Survey of India, the guide talked of how it represented different gods and goddesses, including Radha and Krishna, and Ram and Sita. No expert references to the site talks of this. 
Later, we went to the museum, an elderly person was seemed quite worked up after listening to the guide. He approached me, stating, "See, Alauddin Khilji destroyed this site. But for the Mughals, who destroyed it, this would have been a live temple."
I asked him whether Alauddin Khilji was a Mughal, and he nodded. Then I told him the year when Alauddin Khilji, a Delhi Sultanate ruler of the 14th century, ruled. I asked tell me find when the Mughals came to India. And he had no India!

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.