Skip to main content

Sadbhavna adrift: Wither healing touch?

It was an informal chat perhaps in his office, if I remember correctly, with a group of local scribes. Chief minister Narendra Modi had firmly established himself in saddle after taking over reins of power in October 2001. Unusually informal, Modi would then talk straight, without mincing words. Gujarat riots hadn’t yet taken place. A short discussion ensued on Hindu-Muslim relations. I ask him what he had to say of communal segregation in Ahmedabad. Wasn’t it dangerous that Hindus and Muslims had no interaction, especially after post-Babri 1993 riots? They didn’t know each other at all. Wouldn’t it breed an atmosphere of suspicion? Modi was unimpressed. “What’s so unusual about it?”, he wondered. “Don’t Catholics and Protestants live separately in Northern Ireland? They have separate life styles and values. Community living is an international phenomenon, and one should recognize it as such.”
A decade has passed, and segregation has further solidified. After the 2002 riots, it has geographically spread to rural Gujarat. The North Gujarat village of Sardarpura, where 33 persons were killed in 2002, is in news following conviction of the riots accused. But the deep scars that the riots have left haven’t yet been healed. A social activist tells me, all Muslims living in the village were forced to move out, and while one smaller section, the relatively better off, returned after a while, another, mainly consisting the poor and obviously the majority, still lives in a separate ghetto of riot victims which has emerged post-riots, tens of kilometers away. Things are no different with many other parts of rural Gujarat, where the riots had broken out. Sadbhavna, a new “mission” which Modi has floated, doesn’t seem to touch this scar. May be, he thinks such “community living” in normal and justified.
Not that segregation isn’t there in other cities, whether Delhi or Mumbai. One of my very close friends in Mumbai, who has been a filmmaker and happens to be a Muslim, would ruefully complain to me how he was not allowed to buy up a flat in Lokhandwala area because of his name. Finally, he bought one – but only in the name of his wife, who happens to be a Hindu. In Delhi, the huge Muslim ghettos of Batla House, Zakir Nagar and Nuru Nagar in the Jamia Millia Islamia area, where I spent all of my childhood, sprang up because Muslims living in the rural areas of UP migrated here in search of better living. Segregation, I’m told, has now caught up in the posh areas of the national Capital, too. Hindu house owners in Sukhdev Vihar, where I spent my youth, used to freely rent houses to Muslims. Things have changed now. While Hindus do not allow Muslims in a rented house, Muslims prefer a ghetto as the safe haven.
If experts are to be believed, there is a difference between segregation in Delhi, Mumbai and elsewhere in India, and how it took shape in Gujarat. Achyut Yagnik, a keen social scientist, who has studied Ahmedabad’s demography as perhaps no one else, tells me, “Unlike most other towns, Ahmedabad’s segregation is the creation of riots. Juhapura, where between 2.5 and 3 lakh people live, is the biggest Muslim ghetto of its kind in India where the minority community shifted not because of migratory pressure, but frequent riots in the walled city of Ahmedabad.” Ahmedabad’s textile mills had brought three groups of workers together – Dalits, OBCs and Muslims. They lived in their separate chawls, yet interacted amicably. The 1969 riots saw boundaries being demarcated by constructing high walls as a mark of protection. The walls, which were both symbolic and real, kept rising as years passed by. Frequent riots coupled with collapse of textile mills forced Hindus to flee Muslim majority areas, and vice versa. They all moved to separate localities outside Ahmedabad’s walled city. Things reached a peak in 1993 and 2002.
In fact, today, it is difficult to identify a Muslim family living in the entire western Ahmedabad, supposed to be effluent and posh. The Muslims who lived in this region left the area after the post-Babri riots in 1993, just as the Hindus left posh Muslim-majority areas. A Gujarat law, supposedly enacted to stop such movement, prohibits sale of property to the other community. Yet, both find it “safer” to live away from each other. In 1994, I met a top architect, who had a swimming pool in his house. He was forced to leave after his house was attacked and property gutted. He moved to a Muslim ghetto with his Hindu wife, daughter of a textile mill owner. He told me then, “I have enough money to buy the best of house in Ahmedabad. But I can’t. My children are bothered by Tablighi Jamaat preachers. It’s a pain.” More recently, a friend from Delhi saw a plot he wanted to buy up for constructing a house off Ahmedabad. I took him to the office of a builder. Everything appeared settled, till I got a phone call from the builder’s office: “Please tell your friend discreetly, we do not sell plots to Muslims.”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/sadbhavna-adrift-wither-healing-touch/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.