Skip to main content

Comrade Shahid Siddiqui

That’s how we used to call him. Comrade Shahid Siddiqui. It was the first half of 1970s. He was studying political science in Delhi College, while I was doing English honours in Kirorimal College in Delhi University campus. We used to look upon him as a future Marxist theoretician, someone who would, some day, replace EMS Namboodiripad. He used to talk like a Toofan mail – his style hasn’t changed even now. It terribly impressed me. He was our “leader” in the Students’ Federation of India (SFI), student wing of the CPI(M). I was his cadre, trying to understand what all he and other comrades had to say about a red revolution knocking at India’s doorsteps. He would take our study circles, teach us about pros and cons of Mahatma Gandhi. I remember how, sitting at his residence in Nizamuddin area, he told me to read EMS’s “Gandhi and the Ism”, adding a bit of his own interpretation. “In political science, Gandhi is an anarchist”, he declared. I wasn’t convinced, but didn’t care to contradict him.
The last time I met Shahid was during the Emergency, in his office of the Urdu weekly, Nai Duniya, which he used to edit, as he does now. Suneet Chopra, another young upcoming CPI(M) theoretician, had studied in Britain and come down to India to bring about a revolution. By then, I had already left the SFI, which had experienced a major split. I spotted Suneet at Mandi House, his clean-shaven face hid by a full-blown beard, which has now, I’m told, grown even bigger. Yet, I recognized him. Suneet signaled me to keep quiet. Crossing the busy road, he ran to me, and told me, “Shhh…. I’m underground. Don’t call me Suneet.” Suneet gave me a bundle, which he said, I should deliver to Shahid. “Someone may spot me, hence I can’t go to Nai Duniya office”, he said. I readily agreed, went to Shahid’s Nai Duniya office, and religiously handed over the bundle to Shahid. Shahid took a snipe at Suneet: “He loves to feel romantic about Emergency. What’s he afraid of?”, he wondered.
I found Shahid already a changed man, and never cared to meet him thereafter. I virtually lost track of him till about five years ago, when I was amused to see him on the small screen as an ardent Mulayam Singh supporter. He spoke exactly in the same way, like a Toofan mail. I liked to listen to him, only as part of my old affinity. I watched him carefully as he joined Mayawati, and left her ahead of the recent UP polls to rejoin Mulayam. A few days back, Shahid created a flutter. He came down to Gandhinagar, where I am based now, interviewed chief minister Narendra Modi, which was published in Nai Duniya. Nobody noticed it till a small, two column Times of India story on it by my colleague Harit Mehta created a big flutter. Shahid was slammed for “anti-party activities” for meeting Modi and suspended from Mulayam’s Samajwadi Party. This prompted me to renew my contact with Shahid, and also other SFI friends, just to know what they think of Shahid.
“Oh Rajiv, what a great surprise… Three decades and we haven’t met. Had I known you were in Gandhinagar, I would have certainly come down”, he sounded courteous on phone, and added, “I did nothing wrong. My father (founder of Nai Duniya), in his 80s, was jailed four times during the Emergency. Yet, I was the first person to interview Indira Gandhi after the Emergency was lifted. I just acted as a journalist, asking tough questions, then, as now.” He went on to recall our old SFI days, moving over to how his relationship with the CPI(M) came to an abrupt end when he, in Nai Duniya, sharply criticized Ayatollah Khomeini, who led an Islamic revolution in Iran. “This was quite terrible, but our CPI(M) leaders saw this as my support to the Shah of Iran. I only saw Khomeini as a revivalist of the worst type. Where was I wrong? Yet, I was charged with anti-party activity”, he told me.
This made me ask him: “You once held the view that Muslim communalism and Hindu communalism are equally dangerous. Do you still believe in it?” Like before, Shahid took no time to answer back. He told me on phone: “Yes, I still think, Hindu and Muslim communalism are equally responsible for the current social divide. If Muslim communalism acts as an ignition, Hindu communalism is a fire. Both destroy our social fabric.” He concluded, “Let me tell you as a friend. Politics is not my cup of tea. I’m not going to join politics any more. I will concentrate on journalism. I’m not thick-skinned. Political parties do not need thinking Muslims like me”. Ending about 25-minute conversation, I phoned up Iqbal Jamil, an SFI “leader” in Kirorimal. An amenable friend for the four decades, Iqbal, who runs a school in Delhi, smiled at all that Shahid had to say. “He has been changing parties like he changes clothes. His writings in his paper, which he used to send me as a complementary till few years ago, border on communalism”, he said, adding, “You can understand Shahid – he knows how to keep his Urdu readers happy.”
Others had almost the same thing to tell me. Another SFI “leader” in Kirorimal, Sohail Hashmi, is today a heritage conservationist and a columnist. He tells me that he left the CPI(M) several years ago, and believes Shahid was “never consistent”. “I do recall how he once wrote in praise of the Shah of Iran”, he said. Biswaroop Das, an SFI cadre in Kirorimal who is now professor at the Institute of Social Studies, Surat, confirmed what Sohail had to say. Be that as it may, one thing is common between all of us – whether it is Shahid, or Iqbal, or Sohail, or Biswaroop, or others, we have all “reformed” ourselves in our own ways and learned the hard way that there’s something fundamentally wrong with the Left. Most of us now think that the Left, including the CPI(M), is a spent force, and it needs to reform, maybe like we have reformed ourselves. One of us, Niaz Ahmed Farooqui, who was in the Hindu College, is now a maulana, and is with the Jamaat-e-Ulama-e-Hind. Shahid’s closest SFI man, Mohd Afzal, I’m, told is “with Congress, in fact with Sheila Dixit.” Only, Suneet Chopta remains consistently with CPI(M).


Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Tree-felling for greenery? Despite MoU Gujarat govt 'refuses' to implement proposal

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Rupani is a better choice as Gujarat CM, but is that enough?

You can be a frank and an approachable leader, but is that enough for you to solve social issues which bog society? Soon after Vijay Rupani became Gujarat chief minister on August 5 evening, a top Sachivalaya insider, whom I have known for more than a decade, phoned me up to know what people thought of “the new incumbent”. Hesitant, I told him that he knew Rupani for quite some time, in fact ever since Rupani was in the Rajkot Municipal Corporation, hence he should know better. Refusing to be named, he didn’t mince words, “Rupani is frank, approachable, dynamic”, adding, “It has always been a boon to work with him.”

Why Hindu rites make me recall theatre of absurd and Backet's Waiting for Godot

As I was student of English literature for five long years (1970-75), doing my BA (Hons) and MA course from Delhi University, I (quite like my classmates) never read anything about a term towards which I was to become fascinated in late 1970s -- theatre of the absurd – apparently because it was a French concept. Coined by critic Martin Esslin in his 1960 essay "Theatre of the Absurd", at that time I had only vaguely knew that it pertained to post-World War II plays written by European playwrights.