Skip to main content

Modi’s Nehruvian games

A few days back, I had the pleasure of discussing with one of the top Gujarat bureaucrats, who loves to remain faceless, in detail, about one of the most controversial acquisitions Gujarat government has been trying to clinch – gas network of Gujarat Gas Co Ltd, a subsidiary of the top MNC, British Gas, operating in south Gujarat. With a net worth of around Rs 4,500 crore, Gujarat Gas supplies around 3 million standard cubic meters per day of gas to lakhs of households and enterprises in and around three cities, Surat, Ankaleshwar and Bharuch. Known for his expertise in finance, I asked this bureaucrat pointblank: “Why do you at all want to acquire Gujarat Gas? Don’t you think that you are moving away from the established norm of what many believe should be an ideal state policy – of shedding economic activity and concentrate, instead, on social sector, in which Gujarat still lags? Why not, instead, allow a private player to clinch the deal?”
The acquisition move had already become controversial. It had been reported how a top minister in the Modi government pressured two well-known business houses, Adanis and Torrent, to keep away from the competitive bid floated by British Gas to sell 65 per cent of its stakes. The move, it was suggested, was to ensure that the state public sector undertaking (PSU), Gujarat Sate Petroleum Corporation (GSPC), remained “competition free” and was able to freely negotiate at a lower-than market rate. The pressure move, ostensibly, was to showcase Narendra Modi as the “sure winner” against a top MNC, which was obviously trying to make an all-out effort to sell off its stakes at a competitive rate. Known for his tantrums, if the deal had been struck, Modi would have indeed declared how he had succeeded in acquiring a company, despite heavy odds, owned by India’s former British rulers. It would have been an important issue in the long list in his kitty for propaganda during the forthcoming Gujarat state assembly polls, scheduled for December 2012.
The report, which appeared in the Times of India, it is said, became the main reason for the British Gas to suddenly withdraw from negotiations with the GSPC. The MNC executives argued during a meeting, which took place at Taj in Mumbai, citing the Times of India report, that the Gujarat government was seeking to “rig” competition and force a lower price. The faceless bureaucrat, who is in the know of all that had happened during the negotiations, told me, “British Gas has now begun an independent inquiry into the whole affair. Ever since the negotiations were snapped, there is no further communication from the MNC whether it would like to talk any more.” He did not rule out the MNC once again going in for a fresh bid. Much would depend on what it concludes at the end of its investigation.
Soon after the negotiations were snapped, a thought came to my mind: Wasn’t what the GSPC – and through it the Gujarat government – trying was actually a reversal of what the state government had long been seeking, to attract investment from foreign investors? After all, all of it had happened ahead of the sixth global investment summit, which Narendra Modi, sure of his victory in the state assembly elections, had planned for mid-January 2013. I asked the faceless bureaucrat: Wouldn’t it harm the investment climate? And, more important, wouldn’t it mean that the GSPC (and the Gujarat government) was taking the clock backward by literally entering into an important economic activity, which should ideally fall within the purview of the private sector? After all, Adanis were distributing gas, quite successfully, in Ahmedabad, so why can’t they do it in the South Gujarat cities, too?
The explanation that the faceless babu gave me reminded me what Jawaharlal Nehru used to say (and about which many of us used to be taught during our student days!) – that the public sector should be the engine of economic growth. The bureaucrat only fell short of Nehru’s famous phrase, that the public sector enterprises should be treated as “modern temples” of growth. He said, “The need for acquiring the gas distribution network is important because the private sector is not interested in taking gas to the common man, especially the poor, living in small towns and villages. This is the social cause which only public sector can fulfill. The private sector is only interested in profit. If we succeed in taking over the gas network, one of our major missions will be fulfilled.” I took a dig: “Why not, in that case, nationalize all the gas networks that are there in Gujarat, something that Indira Gandhi did to become popular in early 1970s? The gas network owned by the Adanis, too, would come in state hand, and that would serve the social cause even better.” I reminded him of what critics say, that Adanis are not interested in distributing gas in those areas of Ahmedabad where cost is high, and profit limited. I went on: “Torrent-owned distribution power network exists in Ahmedabad and Surat. Why not do the same with them, just to serve the same social cause?”
The bureaucrat smiled, and answered, “One can only do what is possible, not what is impossible to achieve. Acquisitions of this kind – nationalization of private undertakings – would require legal backing, which is not in the hands of the state government. That’s the reason why we decided to acquire 65 per cent stakes, which is the best way to fulfill our social aim.” I came out of his chamber wondering about a bureaucrat working under Modi who still thinks the Nehru way. I also wondered if Modi had a similar view, or whether his aim for acquiring an MNC-owned company was just another political game. Was that the reason why Modi allowed one his ministers to pressure two big business houses to fall in line? Those who know Modi well know how he pressured several joint stocked listed companies (loosely PSUs) with majority shares owned by the state, to hand over 33 per cent of their profits to the Gujarat government in the name of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Important PSUs involved were – Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals, Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertiliser Company, and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. All know, how the effort was spurned as “not feasible” not just by the bureaucrats who headed as managing directors of these PSUs but also by their shareholders. Modi even tried pushing a similar CSR line to top corporates, but what he got was not more than lip service. There may be reason to wonder: Was he trying to centralize CSR?
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/modi-s-nehruvian-games/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.