Skip to main content

Smell of suspicion

Last week, Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi hosted a sumptuous dinner for the state’s top officialdom based in Gandhinagar. I knew in advance that, ahead of the dinner, there was going to be some speechifying – at least two senior-most officials, Gujarat chief secretary AK Joti, and his No 2, additional chief secretary, planning, Varun Maira, were to be fielded to speak on the Modi miracle, on why other states should “replicate” Gujarat model. Modi was jittery. Officials say, the dinner was in retaliation of 2,025 Sachivalaya babus’ pre-assembly poll signature campaign demanding pay hike, warning him, they are not alone, they are backed by five in the family, and their “support” can multiply. As would happen with any newsperson, I curiously tried to phone up and dig out what exactly had happened at the dinner, which Modi termed Vikas Ni Suhas, or Fragrance of Development. Late in the evening, I got return phone call from one of the participants. “Good food, but speeches were boring. There were too many statistics. But what puzzled us was – the presence of each of us was marked. The general administration department had prepared a list of officials who were called, and a tick was marked against the name of every official who entered in”, this official said.
When I wished to know more, this official remarked, “Rajiv, you know, our phones are tapped. I think, this conversation may have also begun being tapped. Let’s talk one-on-one.” We hung the phone. This was not for the first time what a senior Gujarat bureaucrat was complaining that his phone “may have been tapped.” A few days earlier, a senior official working in a blue-chip public sector undertaking (I am deliberately not naming the PSU, lest this official would be easily identified) had something very similar to tell me. He said, “You are always welcome, but I have stopped picking up your and your colleagues’ phones, because I have the lurking suspicion that someone is trying to find out who all I talk to, whether it was I who was passing on any information." I asked him who this someone could be, and he named a top Modi minister. “Why take risk? Let me be satisfied with my work”, he said. There is nothing new in all this. A senior bureaucrat, before moving to Delhi on deputation in 2008, would occasionally tell me: “I would request you to come and see me after office hours. During day time, your presence is marked and reported, as if I am passing on some crucial information to you.” I never believed him, but this bureaucrat also wouldn’t talk on mobile, citing phone tapping.
Suspicion of phone tapping in the state babudom is not new. Those who believed that their phones were being tapped include two former senior bureaucrats who headed – imagine! – the state home department. One of them is retired and is serving on post-retirement job, and the other, if Sachivalaya buzz is any guide, is tipped to be Gujarat’s next chief secretary. Both of them are known for their excellent administrative skills, and both have told me in no uncertain terms that they had “stopped” picking up my phones on joining home as they feared tapping. While one of them said, “Who knows what devices are installed where, so it is better to be careful”, the other one told me that he had seen the demonstration of an Israeli phone tapping device, shown to him in the presence of former Modi minister Amit Shah and several other police officials. He added, though as an afterthought, looking at me beyond his specs, “I don’t know if the device was installed.”
Around the same time when Modi was hosting Fragrance of Development for the Gandhinagar babudom, I chanced upon a video on Youtube, where senior economist Bibek Debroy spoke as guest speaker at the Friends of BJP gathering in US, called to celebrate Modi’s birthday – September 17. All know Debroy as long-time protege of Modi, ever since he was with Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies and Research – when he declared Gujarat’s economic freedom index as the best in the country. What he wrote was widely publicized by Modi’s propaganda machine. Same this time around – the Youtube video was promptly put on all of Modi’s numerous websites. When I was watching him on Youtube, his economic logic, based on Gujarat’s rate of growth, didn’t interest me as much as the reason he gave to prove what he had to say on “Gujarat miracle’s enabling environment” – that Modi has “empowered” Gujarat bureaucracy, that the state babudom acts without any political interference, and that the administration has become truly decentralized. Debroy’s remark prompted me to email a question to him as to what he had to say about Gujarat’s “empowered” babudom in the context of the way Modi’s handpicked babus are made to handle 2002 riot cases, involvement of several top cops in gruesome fake encounters, and the probe into a Modi minister’s direct hand. A clever economist, he knows he shouldn’t be “misunderstood” about his support to Modi. This is what Debroy replied: “I take your point. Perhaps I should have qualified. I meant in the context of development programmes (sic! not Gujarat’s growth story!). Tenures, transfers, postings, decisions, that kind of thing. And in that context.”
In case Debroy had interacted with state babus he would have known better. It’s common knowledge in Sachivalaya how, before being posted as district collector, Porbandar, HN Chhibber was asked by a top Narendra Modi aide, who happens to be one of the senior-most IAS bureaucrats, to “dig out” facts against senior Congressman Arjun Modhwadia. Known for his no-nonsense approach, Chhibber chanced upon a huge mining scam, instead, and involvement of a former minister of Modi’s Cabinet, Babubhai Bokhiriya. With this began Chhibber’s travails. On the last day of his retirement in November 2011, Modi’s men acted quickly to chargesheet him for his “involvement” in a decade-old debris removal scam in quake-hit Kutch. On Modi’s advice, the government also served a chargesheet on a young IAS official Rajiv Topno, who served as district development officer about the same time when Chhibber was Kutch collector, and is now in the Prime Minister’s Office. There is nothing new about chargesheeting officials like this. A retired bureaucrat, JS Rana would have served as Gujarat chief secretary if he was not forced to put in his papers in 2007. His mistake: He refused free State Transport buses for Modi’s Gaurav Yatra in 2002. An inquiry was institute, which hasn’t yet been fully closed, though he has been cleared by Central Administrative Tribunal.
There are, of course, senior IAS officials who have gone very, very close to Modi by toeing his line. One of them is his longest-serving principal secretary, K Kailashnathan. On poll eve, Modi is taking his services to approach district revenue and forest officials in order to “activate” them to distribute forest land among the tribals. On weekdays he is in Sachivalaya. But a senior official revealed, every Saturday and Sunday he goes to some tribal area or the other in order to organize land for the tribals, though official documents, quoting satellite imagery, suggest that 90 per cent of the tribal claims are “false”. Another IAS official, Vipul Mittra, using his Bollywood contacts, even today takes pride of how he “organized” Amitabh Bacchan for Modi’s tourism ads. “Bacchan was about to back out when controversy about his relations with Modi erupted. I used my connections to bring him back”, Mittra declares now. Mittra, significantly, also “organized” a big chunk of land for Bacchan near the proposed Gujarat International Finance Tec-city (GIFT), the new real estate hub near Ahmedabad. “Modi deputed me to do all the paper work”, he says.


Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.