Skip to main content

Urban Gujarat: The incumbency riddle

Three years ago, a high-level Gujarat government document made a glaring observation, which I haven’t forgotten even today. Ever since I quoted the observation in a news story in late 2009, I have wondered: If things are really so appalling in urban areas, as the document tried to make out, then why do urban dwellers so strongly favour the ruling BJP in Gujarat? More, the urbanites’ voting share for the ruling party appears to have up after every electoral battle. While it may take some time for keen experts like Prof Ghanshyam Shah to analyze the data and identify a trend, even a cursory glance would show that in the last Gujarat assembly election, the saffron party won with great margins in 60-odd purely urban constituencies out of a total of 182. The victory margin ranged between over 1 lakh in Ghatlodia in Ahmedabad, where a Narendra Modi favourite won, to 17,000 in Porbandar, where a Congress stalwart was defeated. This was in complete contrast to rural Gujarat, where the two parties seem to have evened out at 50:50.
Does it mean that there is no impact of anti-incumbency in Gujarat’s urban areas? The state document I am referring to was submitted to the Government of India with the aim to garner funds for public health in urban areas. Never made public and quietly handed over to me by a senior official, the document observed, "Health indicators of urban slums are worse than that of the rural areas." Offering data, it said, the mortality rate of children below five among the urban poor was a high 7.27 per cent, compared to 5.8 per cent in the rural areas. Institutional delivery rate was 44 per cent among the urban poor, compared to 55 per cent in the rural areas. There were 47.1 per cent underweight children among the urban poor compared to 45 per cent in the rural areas. The percentage of anaemic children among the urban poor was 71.4 per cent as against 67.7 per cent in rural areas.
The document admitted, "Despite the availability of medical facilities, both public and private, in the vicinity, the urban poor is unable to access them due to their working hours, lack of information and indifference towards their health." Further: "Urban slums are located in areas with poor hygiene and sanitation." There was "lack of safe drinking water supply and safe waste disposal systems in most of the urban slums." All this contributed to "high levels of water borne diseases" and "higher risk of morbidity and mortality." These observations acquire special significance if one identifies the context – 18 per cent of Gujarat’s urban dwellers live in slums, and the percentage is rising due to pressure from migrant labourers. The slum population in Gujarat is increasing at double the pace of urban population. According to one estimate, 45 per cent of Ahmedabad today live in slums and chawls.
Apparently, nothing has changed over the last three years. In fact, a pro-Narendra Modi economist, Prof Bibek Debroy, has also noticed a urban-rural divide in poverty eradication in Gujarat. In his latest book, "Gujarat: Governance for Growth and Development", published three months back, he notes – albeit "for record" – that in the urban areas the total number of poor have actually gone up, from 4.3 million in 2004-05, to 4.5 million in 2009-10. The data also reveal that urban poverty went down by just 2.2 per cent during the period in question, which is worse than the national average of 4.5 per cent. Very slow reduction in poverty levels and simultaneous influx of rural poor in the urban areas has put Gujarat in the company of five others – Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal – where the absolute number of poor has gone up. It stands in contrast to rural areas, where there is a sharp decline in the absolute number of poor. In Prof Debroy’s calculation, poverty in rural areas during the period went down by a whopping 12.6 per cent, one of the highest in India, and the absolute number of rural poor went down from 12.9 million to 9.2 million. Based on these data, Prof Debroy concludes that the benefits of growth in the agricultural sector have "trickled down" in the rural areas. But as for urban areas, he evades making any such observation!
Appalling conditions in Gujarat’s slums has even been highlighted at other places, too. A recent Nation Sample Survey (NSS) report, "Some Characteristics of Urban Slums", suggests that the condition of slums in Gujarat is not only dismal but is worse than nine other states surveyed – Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. In Gujarat it found just 14 per cent and 29 per cent pucca houses in notified and non-notified slums, respectively.Tthe report says, "In some states like Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, West Bengal and Maharashtra, 72 per cent or more slums had the majority of their houses built with pucca materials." As for Gujarat, along with Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, its "majority of the houses are of type semi-pucca or katcha." Further, just 19 per cent notified slums have pucca roads in Gujarat, which is worse than all other nine states. As many as 59 per cent of notified and 53 per cent of non-notified slums suffer from water logging during monsoon, which is higher than all states except for Orissa. Then, Gujarat's 39 per cent notified slums and 48 per cent of non-notified slums don’t have any latrines, as against the national average of 10 and 20 per cent respectively.
If these data suggest anything, the urban poor should have rebelled against the ruling establishment long back, something that hasn’t happened. It prompted me to send an e-mail to a few experts, posing a few questions. One of them, of course, was Prof Debroy. I asked them how they explained this contradiction. Referring to the urban poor data, I asked them: (1) Why is there no anti-incumbency in urban areas, where the BJP has won more seats than what it used to earlier? (2) Why has the Congress performed better in rural areas, where poverty levels have gone down considerably and the "trickle-down effect" has worked, if one is to believe Prof Debroy? And (3) what could be the factors that influenced the voters in this rural-urban divide? While Prof Debroy hasn’t replied for reasons known to him, others have. For the sake record, I am quoting two of the reactions.
One of those who replied is Shalini Randeria, professor of anthropology and sociology of development at the prestigious Geneva-based Graduate Institute. I have known Randeria more as a class mate in school in Sardar Patel Vidyalaya, New Delhi, where we studied till 1970. An ethnic Gujarati, it was a pleasant surprise when, five years ago, sitting in the office a senior activist, Achyut Yagnik, I met her to find that she has emerged one of the best academics in her subject in Europe. Her reply was straight and simple: "This is a puzzle indeed! The statistics and people's perception diverge? That is, we as social scientists think that the numbers matter to people but often the poor are neither aware of these nor were they to be made aware of statistics would they care sufficiently. Thus, a 2.2% decrease may not make for a change in perception of the poor thought a 12.6% decrease should certainly be discernable in public perception." She also wonders "whether in rural areas the trickle-down effect worked, or Congress’ rural employment programmes worked and people see these as Central programmes rather than Modi ones." Her conclusion: "The latter would explain Congress gains in villages."
Darshini Mahadevia, professor at the prestigious CETP University, Ahmedabad, is an expert on urban policy. She says, "In rural areas where lands have been taken, promise of employment, as in case of Sanand, has not been met. Even the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme has not been implemented sincerely". Coming to the urban areas, she adds, here poverty and the poor are hidden. "The glitter and glamour in the cities, partly on account of the JNNURM funding has influenced people. Those who are not poor have not looked out for the impact of liberalization on urban poor. Indian middle class in general, researchers have hypothesized, are unsympathetic to the cause of the poor. It is consumerist, aggressive in defense of the privileges it has enjoyed, socially reactionary and hence under the influence of Hindutva. Consequently, it seeks to support practices like dowry and female foeticide. Modi is a representative of this idea of development. Modi appeals to the dark basal instincts of people, as he makes them chant in a trance ‘kill’ (as he did for the last elections) or plays on the insecurities of the ‘other’. All of us always gossip about how bad the ‘other’ is and Modi plays on it. Hence, the urban population would like Modi and vote for him. They will like him in whole India, as we see the influence of rising middle classes in India. So, there is a clear explanation of why Modi has and will lose in rural India."
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/urban-gujarat-the-incumbency-riddle/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.