Skip to main content

Gujarat growth: the trickle down myth

Bibek Debroy
Over the past few weeks, whenever I visited a senior state bureaucrat’s chamber in Gandhinagar Sachivalaya, I would invariably notice a coffee table book prominently displayed – “Gujarat: Governance for Growth and Development”, authored by Prof Bibek Debroy, an economist who shot into prominence after he was forced to move out of the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation several years ago. It’s a common knowledge: He had “researched” in a study report that Gujarat was No 1 in economic freedom index. This was his only fault. One of the bureaucrats proudly gave me a copy of the book, but not before telling me how Debroy had prepared the book after moving around Gujarat – of course, with every possible official help. Based on facts and figures in the book, this bureaucrat, just ahead of his retirement in October-end, made a presentation on Gujarat’s model of development at an evening get-together for state IAS bureaucrats called by chief minister Narendra Modi to mark his own 4,000 days in office. Why 4,000 days was difficult to understand, yet this bureaucrat made a strong case for Gujarat, declaring that the model was “viable enough” for other states to follow. The function, many participants told me later, was held with the political aim to woo babus ahead of the Gujarat state polls at a time when the state employees seemed to be in a threateningly belligerent mood.
Scanning through the book, which seemed well-written and well-researched, I stopped at Debroy’s observations on poverty. Quoting National Sample Survey (NSS) data, he says that there is no “enormous increase in inequality in Gujarat in the period of high growth”, and that “the inequality numbers are very close to all-India trends and as with all-India trends, have been almost flat overtime.” The period that he was referring to was almost the entire last decade. At another place he declares that in Gujarat, “in line with all-India trends, overall poverty and urban poverty have declined”, adding, “The real story is in rural Gujarat, where there has been a very sharp drop in poverty, significantly more than all-India trends.” Thus, the urban poverty went down from 20.1 per cent in 2005-05 to 17.9 per cent in 2009-10, rural poverty went down from 39.1 per cent to 26.7 per cent. “In rural Gujarat”, he insists, “the benefits of growth have trickled down.”
Convincing figures; but this forced me to do a little bit of talking. Prof Indira Hirway, an economist who heads the Centre for Development Alternatives in Ahmedabad, contradicting the claim, forwarded to me her paper on the same subject, again, based on the same NSS figures which Debroy quotes.
Hirway says in her paper, “Though the rate of decline in poverty during 2004-05 – 2009-10 in Gujarat was 8.6 percentage point, the state ranked 9th among the major 20 states in India in poverty reduction. The relatively slow growing states like Uttarakhand, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh etc. have experienced much higher decline in poverty during this period. In fact, Gujarat, which stood 7th in the incidence of poverty among the 20 states in 1993-94, maintained its 7th rank in 2004-05 but dropped to 9th rank in 2009-10. In other words, in spite of being the fastest growing state during 2004-05 – 2009-10, Gujarat slipped in its performance in poverty reduction. This shows that growth alone does not count for poverty reduction, and something more is needed to translate growth into poverty reduction.”
Gujarat’s poverty reduction was 8.6 per cent, as against Himachal Pradesh’s 13.4 per cent, Karnataka’s 9.7 per cent, Madhya Pradesh’s 11.6 per cent, Maharashtra’s 13.7 per cent, Orissa’s 20.2 per cent, Rajasthan’s 9.2 per cent, Tamil Nadu’s 12.3 per cent, and Uttarakhand’s 13.7 per cent. Worse, while in rural poverty reduction Gujarat did much better than all-India average (12.4 per cent as against all-India’s 8.2 per cent), in urban poverty reduction the state flopped (2.2 per cent as against all-India’s 4.6 per cent).
I was wondering: If trickle-down growth, which Debroy strongly advocates, has succeeded in rural Gujarat, why has it failed in urban Gujarat? Debroy himself believes that Gujarat is No 1 in economic freedom index, and is, therefore, the best investment destination. Senior officials explain this by saying that there has been a “large-scale migration of the rural poor to urban areas” on account of unprecedented real estate and industrial activity taking shape all around major cities like Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara, Rajkot, Jamnagar and Bhavnagar, as also their periphery.
A friend in Delhi forwarded to me a Planning Commission note prepared on Gujarat development on the basis of papers prepared at a seminar held a few months back in Ahmedabad. It carries a synopsis of the paper by Prof Sebestian Morris, a faculty at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, which says: “What is remarkable of Gujarat is it has been able to maintain and enhance its comparative advantage (in growth) despite a high level of per capita income, when all other highly industrialized (and high income) states have as expected steadily lost their comparative advantage with per capita growth. This is due to low labour costs in the state (repressed wages and poor quality of employment), the higher income inequality (for higher rate of savings), high tax concessions and other incentives to corporate investments, vast migrations to Gujarat and the increasing use of capital intensive machinery in Gujarat (low growth of employment and poor shift of labour from primary to non-primary sectors).” Hence the advice, “There is now a need for the state to shift to income distribution.”
I, too, decided to have a look at the NSS figures of 2009-10 which Debroy and others are quoting, and I found a very interesting picture, and where Gujarat stands. The purchasing power of the poorest 10 per cent of Gujarat, I found, was worse than several major states, though a little better than the national average. While rural Gujarat’s average monthly per capita expenditure (MPCE), which is the yardstick adopted for calculating purchasing power, is Rs 1,110, the purchasing power of the lowest 10 per cent is Rs 524. This is lower than eight other major states. The urban scenario is not very different, where average MPCE is Rs 1,909, and that of the lowest 10 per cent is Rs 702, which is lower than half-a-dozen major states.
A closer look showed me that, perhaps, inequality levels in Gujarat are lower than the rest of India because the purchasing capacity of the upper 10 per cent is worse than most Indian states, indeed worse than the national average, and not because the poor are less poor. The upper 10 per cent’s MPCE in Gujarat is Rs 2,362 in rural and Rs 4,592 in urban areas, as against the national average of Rs 2,517 and Rs 5,863, respectively. I haven’t come across any economist’s explanation, though Hirway told me once that NSS’ calculation on inequality is based on MPCE, which wouldn’t tell you the real picture. The poorer sections may be earn less but spend more by taking debt, while the richer sections may earning more but spend less. “One should, instead, look at income inequality, not MPCE inequality”, she said, adding, “If one were to see income inequality, it is much higher in Gujarat than all-India. This has been calculated by Dr Rajesh Shukla of the National Council of Applied Economic Research.”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/gujarat-growth-the-trickle-down-myth/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.