Skip to main content

Modi's postal ballot confusion

The Gujarat state assembly elections last month brought back chief minister Narendra Modi to power with a resounding victory. A month has gone by, yet I am left wondering what prompted Modi – in his first speech after the victory, delivered at the BJP headquarters in Ahmedabad – to thank the government staff for overwhelmingly voting for his party. Addressing a jubilant gathering of his supporters, which included a top Congress turncoat, Narhari Amin, Modi dished out a figure of the support he believed he got from the karmacharis – 70 per cent! This was, indeed, quite in contrast to what a few officials in the chief minister’s office (CMO), as also some senior secretaries, had been telling me all along – that the karmacharis had “generally cast their vote against Modi in the postal ballots.” There were even reports that, at some places, the karmacharis, especially cops, were prevented from posting their ballots. They were told to “perform their duty” instead of voting. When I tried inquiring from Anita Karwal, chief electoral officer (CEO), Gujarat state, about it, she said there was nothing unusual, that they “had the option to vote later”.
After the full results were out, I tried to find out how the Gujarat karmacharis had voted. The only way was to get party-wise breakup of the postal ballots, which the CEO’s office had. My desire to get the breakup became stronger after I was told that Congress should thank its stars that, at two places, Kalol and Sojitra, it could win by a very thin margin thanks to the karmacharis’ postal ballots. I officially tried obtaining the list, but I was told by Karwal, a Gujarat cadre IAS bureaucrat on deputation to the Election Commission, that newspersons were “not entitled to get constituency-wise results of the postal ballots”; she added, only “registered political parties were.” Someone commented, she was trying to “play safe”, to which I strongly objected. “She had nowhere else to go but join the Gujarat government, once she returns from deputation”, was the remark. Be that as it may, finally, one of my friends helped me get the list from the CEO’s office. It was absolutely revealing. Out of a total of 182, majority of karmacharis had voted for the BJP only in 52 constituencies!
I was left wondering: What made Modi offer the mysterious figure of 70 per cent karmacharis having voted in his favour? After all, he had won the polls hands down. Why was he seeking to provide wrong information? Till now, karmacharis would fear that their identity would be revealed in case they voted via the postal ballot, hence majority of them would never vote. However, this time, they voted heavily, without any fear, and with vengeance, unheard of till now. This wasn’t for the first time that Modi was providing imaginary figures. There are umpteen such instances, and one can add to these, what he declared at the Vibrant Gujarat global investors’ meet on January 12 – that, last year, Gujarat attracted 76 per cent of all employment of the country, and that Gujarat’s small and medium industries (SMEs) grew by 82 per cent. Consultants, present on the occasion, looked at each other. Does it mean that there was no job creation in the rest of India? A senior chartered accountant, who is in close contact with few top industrial houses, added: “The MSE figure is travesty of the truth. Industry circles are upset by stagnation in the sector. Only big industries are growing.”
A closer look at constituency-wise details suggest that barring three major districts – Ahmedabad, Surat and Bhavnagar – karmacharis across the state cast their postal ballot heavily against the BJP. Though Congress was the obvious gainer, it was anti-incumbency against Modi that seemed to be rampant. In Vadodara district, except for two constituencies, Sayajiganj and Savli, everywhere else the karmacharis voted against the BJP. In Rajkot district, Gondal was the only exception. A friend calculated all the figures and told me – out of a total of, 2.76 lakh postal ballots cast by karmacharis, the BJP polled 40 per cent, the Congress 51 per cent, and the rest went to the newly-formed Gujarat Parivartan Party, a splinter from the BJP, and others.
There is a need to find out the reason why the karmacharis – called as karmayogis by Modi – are not happy with him. While the refusal of the Gujarat government to implement the Central sixth pay commission recommendations could be one, if insiders are to be believed, the reasons are deeper. The view is strong that they are terribly upset by Modi wanting them to do odd jobs, especially organizing rallies, bringing people to the rallies, raising funds, and creating hype around him. District collectors are heard complaining that they have not been able to do their routine job because of mela-type rallies. A senior bureaucrat of the industries department told me on the opening day of the Vibrant Gujarat summit, January 11, that he was doing “chaprasi’s job” – of counting the number of chairs for VVIPs. Another IAS babu, Gujarat information commissioner V Thirupugazh, I was told, had sleepless nights ahead of the summit just because he was busy fixing the space meant for mediapersons at the summit venue in accordance with security requirements.
Modi’s efforts to woo babus through chintan shibirs for his campaigns have gone awry. Chintan shibirs for every level of karmacharis – from class one to four – have come to a grinding halt. The main aim of the shibirs, to instill among karmacharis a sense of duty, ostensibly following Bhagwat Geeta principle of doing work selflessly without thinking of the elusive fruit, apparently hasn’t gone down well with the karmacharis.
Modi’s worst experience has been with the safai karmacharis. In 2007, he got published a book, “Karmayog” – actually a collection of his speeches at his high-profile chintan shibirs of IAS officials. Here, he qualified the Valmikis' centuries-old caste-based vocation – of cleaning up others' filth, including toilets – as "experience in spirituality." Modi said, "I do not believe that they have been doing this job just to sustain their livelihood. Had this been so, they would not have continued with this type of job generation after generation….At some point of time, somebody must have got the enlightenment that it is their (Valmikis') duty to work for the happiness of the entire society and the Gods; that they have to do this job bestowed upon them by Gods; and that this job of cleaning up should continue as an internal spiritual activity for centuries. This should have continued generation after generation. It is impossible believe that their ancestors did not have the choice of adopting any other work or business."
A news item on Modi’s remark was published in the Times of India in mid-November 2007. It went unnoticed in Gujarat, but its translation was published in Tamil Nadu, where Dalits staged a protest for calling their menial job “spiritual experience”. They burnt Modi’s effigy. Sensing trouble he withdrew 5,000 copies of the book, but refused to change his opinion. Two years later, addressing 9,000-odd safai karmacharis, he likened the safai karmacharis’ job of cleaning up others’ dirt to that of a temple priest. He told them, “A priest cleans a temple every day before prayers, you also clean the city like a temple. You and the temple priest work alike.” Safai karmacharis and their activist mentors haven’t liked such a stance.
Activists wonder: if Modi values safai karmacharis so highly, why has he begun outsourcing all the menial jobs for a very low pay, between Rs 3,000 and Rs 3,500 per month per worker? Why are they not being employed on a permanent basis? Dalit poet Nirav Patel, while commenting on the reference in “Karmayog”, told me in 2007, Modi’s comment was part of the “larger conspiracy” to continue with caste divisions and exploitation. He asked bitterly: “Why didn’t it occur to Modi that the spirituality involved in doing menial jobs hasn’t ever been experienced by the upper castes?” Novelist-activist Joseph Macwan called Modi’s termed it a reflection of the “Brahminical world view and a status quo approach”. He wondered, “How can a person who has to work in a gutter be described as doing some spiritual duty?”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/modi-s-postal-ballot-confusion/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.