Skip to main content

The transparency sham

Prof Indira Hirway
It was nearly two years ago. A representative of Ahmedabad-based voluntary organization, Pathey, founded by one senior activist-turned-Congress politician, handed over to me during a session of the Gujarat state assembly a four-page folder which said, on the basis of a survey, that Gujarat government topped in transparency index among a group of 10 major states. The state powerdom, obviously, went gaga over it, seeking political gain. The index was based on queries regarding transparency in budget making. The survey was carried out in alliance with New Delhi-based Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability (CBGA). What seemed to provide credence to the survey was, it was sponsored, among others, by Ford Foundation and Oxfam India. Covering budget-making in Gujarat every year after being posted in Gandhinagar in 1997, I wasn’t just amused but irritated, as my interaction with top state guns was just the opposite. Indeed, there was lot of transparency when I began covering Sachivalaya for the Times of India in late 1990s, so much so that officials would willingly part with any data you wanted, even if these told harsh realities. But after Narendra Modi came to power in October 2001, things changed, so much so that inconvenient data began being increasingly suppressed. Only those data which seemed convenient to Modi was selectively released.
Recently, senior academic Indira Hirway told me how she was getting frequent calls from members of the Planning Commission wanting her to ask state officials to provide latest state growth rate data. All states had “reconciled” these data for 2011-12, except Gujarat. I don’t know the reason, but a Planning Commission source says, much against the loud claims of the state government of double digit rate of growth, state agriculture grew by 7.53 per cent during the 11th five year plan. A good growth rate, it also seemed to suggest that it was mainly because during one year the state agriculture grew by 27.05 per cent, but slipped into the negative for two other years!
I was instantly reminded of the Pathey survey during my during interaction with two Ahmedabad-based Right to Information (RTI) activists, Pankti Jog and Harinesh Pandya, who run Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel (MAGP), which provides hotline service to anyone wanting to know on how to make an RTI application. As I sat with them during a wintry afternoon, phone calls kept ringing. If ordinary citizens wanted to know how to make RTI applications, government officials tried to find out how to reply to particular RTI pleas. “There is no dearth of phone calls from officials, who wanted to be acquainted of the rules under which an application is accepted or rejected”, they told me, suggesting, awareness on RTI rules was lacking at all levels in the government.
The activists handed over to me a reply they had received to their plea to get details of tours of ministers and other officials, both foreign and domestic. Jog wanted these should be declared suo motu, as part of voluntary disclosure under RTI. She showed me a Government of India order, which said that half-yearly suo motu declaration, starting with January 1, 2012, be regularly made public and posted on the web, so that public do not need to resort to the RTI Act to obtain it.
Gujarat government, in its reply dated January 5, 2013, told Jog that though it had received the Central order, it couldn’t give the information or put it on the web, as the file on was “under consideration”. I wondered, if Gujarat government was so transparent, why this reluctance? Or, was it afraid of parting with some hard facts? It is common knowledge: Modi must ride the chopper even if he has to go just 50 km from Gandhinagar. Jog and Pandya told me that, voluntary disclosures, under RTI rules, should be made not just of official tours of ministers but also about any concessions the government may have given to entrepreneurs or organizations. As an example, they gave me an order by Gujarat information commissioner RN Das, dated June 27, 2011, where he quotes serial No (viii) of Section 4 (1)(b) of the RTI Act, which stipulates the need to proactively disclose “particulars of the recipients of concessions, permits, or authorizations” granted by a public authority. Jog had demanded information on mining leases in Porbandar, given by the state, and it took full four years for the state information commissioner to order it be given. “Eighteen months after the order, the government hasn’t provided any information, let alone put it on the web”, she told said. It wasn’t hard for me to guess as to why concessions to the Tatas’ Nano car project, or Ford, or other such mega projects aren’t made public either. The pretext is – it would harm the corporates’ business interest!
In her application dated July 9, 2007 to the district collector’s office, Jog had demanded “details of the all the leases/permissions” for building stone (bela patthar) mining in Porbandar district”. The information she had sought included name of the lease holder and contact details, the date of commencement of the lease, its expiry date, the date of renewal, the area for which the mining is permitted or lease is allotted, nature or type of land on which mining is allowed, the depth in feet till which mining is allowed, number of visits to the mining site by the government officers from the date of the commencement, and details of violations and action taken.
The illegal mining issue, if anything, suggests the travesty of transparency of Gujarat government. In mid-2000s, two IAS bureaucrats were posted, one after another, as district collector, Porbandar, Sheila Benjamin and VN Chhibber. Both exceptionally tried to fight illegal mining. At one stage Benjamin wrote to the government how mafia was running the show and she was helpless in the face of lack of support from the government. She was summarily transferred. Chhibber actually took action against the mafia. And, he was made to suffer – insiders confirm, a fake inquiry was instituted against him on the last date of retirement, December 31, 2011. As the story goes, Chhibber was posted in Porbandar with specific instructions from the chief minister’s office (CMO) to “investigate illegal activities” of Opposition leader Arjun Modhwadia, who hails from Porbandar. On reaching Porbandar, Chhibber found nothing against Modhwadia, but found a senior BJP leader very close to Modi deeply involved in illegal mining. This senior leader, incidentally, is now a Cabinet minister under Modi.
Travesty of transparency is strongly felt in budget making, too. As the last year drew to a close, I would often approach additional chief secretary, finance, Varesh Sinha – just promoted as Gujarat chief secretary – for details of the amount collected by Gujarat government as value added tax (VAT) and registration of real estate deals, as reflected in stamp duty collection. I told him, it would suggest the impact of the slowdown on the state economy. Sinha, without mincing words, replied he “didn’t have” these details. Once he said he would “look into the matter”, but he never did. I approached his junior, economic affairs secretary S Aparna. She promised me she would give me details. I approached her half-a-dozen times, and she would either say she had “forgotten” or I should approach her some other day. Finally, she told me to approach some other officials. Interestingly, these details come to her and Sinha on a daily basis and were part of their budget-making exercise.
In another instance, a senior state official would in the past gladly hand me over details of the amount spent by the state government under annual plan, for developmental works. For the last two years, things became difficult for him to retrieve the information because, as he put it, “Gujarat government doesn’t make available comprehensive details of the amount spent to all secretaries. Each department secretary is kept in the dark about the amount spent by all other departments.” Insiders, of course, tell me, how at the end of each year the government fails to spend huge sums, often up to Rs 10,000 crore, and all of it is shown as “spent” by “parking” it with government boards or corporations!
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/the-transparency-sham/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Tree-felling for greenery? Despite MoU Gujarat govt 'refuses' to implement proposal

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Rupani is a better choice as Gujarat CM, but is that enough?

You can be a frank and an approachable leader, but is that enough for you to solve social issues which bog society? Soon after Vijay Rupani became Gujarat chief minister on August 5 evening, a top Sachivalaya insider, whom I have known for more than a decade, phoned me up to know what people thought of “the new incumbent”. Hesitant, I told him that he knew Rupani for quite some time, in fact ever since Rupani was in the Rajkot Municipal Corporation, hence he should know better. Refusing to be named, he didn’t mince words, “Rupani is frank, approachable, dynamic”, adding, “It has always been a boon to work with him.”

Why Hindu rites make me recall theatre of absurd and Backet's Waiting for Godot

As I was student of English literature for five long years (1970-75), doing my BA (Hons) and MA course from Delhi University, I (quite like my classmates) never read anything about a term towards which I was to become fascinated in late 1970s -- theatre of the absurd – apparently because it was a French concept. Coined by critic Martin Esslin in his 1960 essay "Theatre of the Absurd", at that time I had only vaguely knew that it pertained to post-World War II plays written by European playwrights.