Skip to main content

In the name of Gujarat's pride

Eight years ago, addressing a gathering of state forest officials at the sprawling campus of the Gujarat Forestry Research and Training Complex in the state capital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi seemed a little unsettled. A few mediapersons too were present, and I happened to be one of them. On April 28, 2005, Modi was confronted with this ticklish query: Will Gir no longer be the only habitat of the Asiatic lion, often addressed as the “Pride of Gujarat”? Announcing that the Asiatic lion's population had risen to 359, a rise of 32 in five years, Modi seemed to feel it was enough to seek publicity on how animal conservation under him had taken new strides – at a time when he had already invited enough ire for failing to conserve the human during the Gujarat riots.
Puzzled by the query, he looked around, but no official dared tell him the truth. Refusing to take a stand on the issue (the Gujarat government for several years had been fighting against the “expert” suggestion to shift lions to Madhya Pradesh), Modi seemed to sing a different tune – the “matter was wide open”, he declared. This is what he said, even as forest officials looked at each other in bewilderment: “There are two opposing views on the issue held by experts and there seems to be no meeting point. The matter remains unsettled. ” Soon after Modi's statement, an embarrassed chief wildlife warden, Pradeep Khanna, asked me “not to report on what Modi had said”, as he believed the “CM had not been briefed properly on the matter.” Khanna also felt, if reported, “those who are in favour of shifting a few lions to Kuno-Palpur sanctuary in Madhya Pradesh would get a chance to oppose Gujarat's declared stand against shifting any lions.”
Eight years later, things have taken full circle, with Modi presiding frantic meetings in Gandhinagar on how to “protect” the Pride of Gujarat from leaving its homeland. He has lost a legal battle in the Supreme Court, which wants a complete plan to be prepared on shifting Asiatic lions to Madhya Pradesh to give them a second home. The apex court judgment is no different from what the Wildlife Institute of India, DehraDun, had said a decade ago on shifting a few lions from Gir. It felt that confining lions to one area could leave them “vulnerable to biological, climatic or man-made catastrophes like epidemic or natural disaster.” It took the view that the Gir protected area had begun to “burst at its seams”, with lions straying out of the national park and the sanctuary. While the state forest officials' stated position was that the lion was only straying out to its “earlier held territory” which he had lost over the years, insiders had a totally different view to tell.
In fact, talking to local forest officials of Gir, it seemed clear that the Asiatic lion was moving out of its territory out of desperation, not to regain the lost territory. I must have visited the Gir protected area thrice, and every time, I would ask local foresters one question: What's the reason for the lions to stray away from the national park and the sanctuary? After all, the Gujarat government wants local inhabitants, maldharis, to shift from Gir so that there is no man-animal conflict. Shouldn't the Asiatic lion feel safer? To my utter surprise, almost every local forester told me that the effort to shift out the maldharis from the Gir had actually accelerated the pace of lions moving out the protected area and straying southwards, towards the Saurashtra coast. “The lions, over the years, had got used to prey on the maldharis' buffaloes. They are moving out of the forest area for no other reason but in search of their lost prey”, is what one of them told me.
Another forester was more forthright: “The Asiatic lion, over time, has become docile. He does not believe in running after a dear. In fact, he has learned how not to struggle hard for the prey, as he believes getting buffaloes is so very easy. All this happened as the maldharis would set free old, uneconomical buffaloes, which would particularly become the most easy prey.” Another forester, who drove me into the “no man's land”, national park, in his diesel jeep, added, “We foresters, in fact, have contributed in making the lion docile. No lion censuses have been held without tying up buffaloes, allowing them to be made an easy prey.” He even gave a certain number of buffaloes which were bought from the maldharis for the purpose, though adding, “Don't report it. This has been kept a guarded secret, as it is banned to use buffaloes like this”, he declared.
Ironically, the government effort to shift out the maldharis in the name of overcoming man-animal conflict is in sharp contrast to the way the government allows religious tourists to reach two shrines inside the protected area – Kankai and Tulsi Shyam temples. A decade ago, I was told, a total of 75,000 people visited these shrines in a year. Now, with Amibabh Bacchan ads propagating Gir as a tourist spot, the numbers would have multiplied. My visit to Kankai, bordering the “no man's land”, Gir national park, about five years ago suggested that “tourists” were not only allowed to live there overnight. They came in hordes, all in diesel jeeps and cars, singing aloud all the way!
More recently, a Geneva-based scholar has revealed, almost on the lines of the local foresters, how application of western norms of biodiversity conservation on the Gir forest actually forced the lion to move out of the protected area. Writing in “Asia and Europe Bulletin” of the University of Zurich, Prof Shalini Randeria, who chairs the anthropology and sociology department at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, has suggested how “displacement” and “dispossession” of the forest dwellers of Gir ensured that the buffaloes too moved out of the forest, making the King of Jungle to follow suit.
An ethnic Gujarati, Randheria says, her “ethnographic material generated in the Gir forest, which was home to a World Bank-funded biodiversity conservation programme”, suggested that “pastoralists” in fact made their own positive contribution “to conservation, including their intimate knowledge of, and care for their surroundings, as well as the symbiotic relationship between their buffaloes and the lions that prey on the herds of cattle.”
Criticizing “Euro-American ideology of ‘protected areas', she says, “Among its assumptions is an antagonism between the rights of nature and those of local inhabitants. The expansion of protected areas thus leads to the conversion of inhabited forests into uninhabited national parks”, which turns forest dwellers “into encroachers, illegal residents and lawbreakers” in their own homeland. The result has been disastrous: “The Asiatic lions’ survival in the Gir forest depended on a delicate ecological balance, maintained by the presence of the pastoral communities’ buffaloes. With the displacement of the cattle and their owners, the lions were forced to move further out into the sanctuary area and beyond in search of prey. Some lions had to be shot when they began to prey on cattle in the villages around the Gir forest, even turning into man-eaters on occasion.”
If what Randheria's argument is correct, would the newly-created future home for the Asiatic lion, Kuno-Palpur in Madhya Pradesh, be safe for the Pride of Gujarat? Let experts ponder.
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/in-the-name-of-gujarat-s-pride/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.