Skip to main content

Trump an American Modi? No way, say NRIs

A tweet the other day by a well-known America-based political scientist, Milan Vaishnav, amused me. Associated with the think-tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which has research centres in Beijing, Beirut, Brussels, Moscow, and Washington, he quantified what I had witnessed during my recent US visit: Though he has been called “American Modi” by many in India, Republican presidential aspirant Donald Trump isn’t quite liked by NRI Modi supporters.
Impossible to dub him a “left liberal” by any stretch of imagination (he supports market reforms), Vaishnav’s tweet said, “Reminder: Upwards of 80% of Indian-Americans vote Democratic.” That was in response to a story in “The Hindu”, “Indian-Americans for Trump? Only a handful”.
Though I haven’t ever met or interacted with Vaishnav except through Twitter, his commentaries have interested me. In one of the latest ones, published in “Foreign Affairs”, he says, “The challenge for Modi is to use his considerable political capital to convince the electorate—not to mention skeptics within his own party—that pro-poor and pro-market are two sides of the same coin.”
At the same time, he underscores what many intellectuals in India have long been saying, that “Modi appears unable to rein in elements of his party that perpetuate the worst of its hard-line traditions, and the fact that members of his cabinet have often vocally backed fringe positions suggests that he is also unwilling to do so.”
I decided to ask him through a tweet: “Is it true that NRIs support Modi but oppose Trump, ironically described as US Modi?” His reply was: “Hard to generalize, but only a minority likely (to) support Trump; not sure if we have any data on pro/anti-Modi views of NRIs”.
I had gone to the US on a personal visit, spent time with my children, one of whom is a software engineer, and the other is pursuing PhD in engineering. It was great relaxing and interacting with their young and old friends, many of whom (though not all) are non-resident Indians. Quite often, Trump and Modi were topics of discussion. One of those whom I met was an unassuming Gowri Goli, an IT buff, who has lately turned into an NRI film producer.
Goli, who has finished his feature film “Spices of Liberty”, is currently involved in promoting it – I attended one such promotional evenings. An interesting person to talk to, I decided to reconnect with him. I sent him a somewhat provocative email: “On being back to India, I found Indian media making an interesting comparison, between Modi and Trump, pointing towards huge similarities between the two. Do NRIs agree?”
Belonging to Andhra Pradesh and an American citizen, Goli’s immediate reaction was, “Is it? So silly”, and then he went on describe what he thinks of Trump. Compared to Modi, he said, “This guy (Trump) is rich and famous and has lot of lavish habits.” Gowri added, only “rich Indians” like Trump because they think he will give tax break for the rich; however, these rich Indians “don’t vote… They are many of them around…”
Another person whose reaction I sought is an old family friend, Paramita Bhatt, currently attached with the Art of Living (AoL) near New York. Bhatt had come to Delhi for the recent AoL event, and I enjoyed her Facebook posts. I asked her the same question, and this is what she told me in an email reply: “You cannot compare Trump with Modiji at all. Trump is completely crazy and insane. He has no political experience at all. Republicans are now very scared of him of being nominated. NRI community has very high regards for our PM Modiji and it fully supports him. Lot of good work is being undertaken by Modiji, and NRIs feel he is man of action. A replica of Sardar Patel…”
I personally interacted with several other persons, but I am not using their name, as it was all oral; yet the tone was of clear rejection of Trump. One of them, a software consultant living in the US for the last few decades, told me, “I have told my family, we should prepare to pack up if Trump comes to power.” Yet another said, “It is strange. He talks one thing about Indians at one point, and a totally opposite at another place.”
Referring to the news that Trump has added India in the list of countries which have taken away Afro-Americans’ jobs, a young software engineer said, “I only hope he does not implement what he says. I am worried… American politicians are known to say lot of things before elections, but once they are elected, they just look the other way”, but insisted, “Trump, with such tantrums, will not win.”
More interesting was what an NRI research scientist told me about what would happen in case Trump becomes US president. He said, “There is a distinct view floating around, especially in the university where I work, that even if he is elected, it would not be easy for him to work as president. And, if he tries to implement what he says, he will surely be impeached…”
Majority of the NRI youngsters, despite their prosaic praise for Modi, seemed convinced: That Trump is not an American Modi. They didn’t accept the argument that Modi is a divisive politician, but in the same breath suggested that Trump is.
They particularly brush aside as “ridiculous” the view expressed in a section of intellectuals that both men have “gravitated to right wing, conservative political parties, the BJP in India and the Republicans in Trump’s case.” According to this view (which has already been dubbed left-liberal), “In terms of the ideology they represent, both leaders appeal strongly to that type of constituency.”
In fact, the Indian settlers’ view in America, I found, was almost similar to the immigrants from other countries. A Lebanese was our next door neighbour. A Muslim and an American citizen, who earlier lived in New York, but has now shifted to a southern state, he criticized American politicians for “whipping up such type of tension ahead of elections.”
“I am sure, Trump is not going to win. In any case, he will not get any support from the immigrants, Middle-Eastern, Latin American, Chinese or Indian. Who will vote for him after he said Muslims aren’t helping fight terrorism, or for his intention to build a wall on borders with Mexico?”, he said, adding, “These politicians say one thing before elections, but once elected have to fall in line with the system, lest they wouldn’t survive. The system is very strong here.”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/trump-an-american-modi-no-way-say-nris/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.