Skip to main content

Modi’s educational qualifications — An unnecessary controversy

Ever since the controversy – if can be called that – broke out last year about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BA and MA degrees, I had been informally telling some of those involved in questioning his educational qualifications, including Ahmedabad-based political activist Roshan Shah and a few scribes, that, what I know for sure is, he was an MA student in Gujarat University. I am naming Roshan – whom I have found to be a fine person with good insights into local Gujarat issues, and a keen campaigner against Modi and Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel on social media (something Modi’s opponents utterly lack) – because he was a kingpin in raising this and similar such controversies, citing RTI pleas and complaints.
Not that doubts about Modi’s educational qualifications did not exist earlier. They did exist even in my mind after he became Gujarat chief minister. Yet, these doubts seemed to have got cleared, when during an informal gathering, I asked Dinesh Shukla, a veteran retired professor of political science at the Gujarat University, what the reality was. I vaguely remembered what Professor Shukla told me more than a decade ago: “Modi was my student in MA political science, he used to attend classes, but I don’t know where he disappeared later.”
Following the latest controversy, I decided to again approach Professor Shukla, just to be doubly sure. After all, I have always respected him as one of the handful Gujarat-based academics with a strong human rights slant. And this is what he told me: “Yes, it is true, I told you that. Modi did attend MA part one classes, but was irregular. He lacked attendance, as did many other students in the class, hence I and my colleagues decided to complete their attendance registers in such a way that they could appear in the examination. However, never saw him in MA part two. There are now newspaper reports which say that he became an external student.”
On Sunday morning, I thought, the controversy had ended. Even as Arvind Kejriwal awaited facts on Modi’s educational qualifications, “Ahmedabad Mirror” carried a story that Modi “completed his masters in political science with a score of 62.3 per cent in 1983” from Gujarat University, citing official records. But I was proved wrong.
In my eagerness to prove that I was right, I posted on Facebook, saying the “unnecessary controversy should end” following the “Mirror” story. No sooner came a reply from Jawaharlal Nehru University’s well-known Prof Kamal Mitra Chenoy, a very insightful academic whom I have known since my student days: “It is elementary that in such controversies, one cannot rely wholly on one article from a prominent newspaper from the same politician’s state.” It sounds strange, I thought. Why doubt a Gujarat-based daily just because it happens to be from Modi’s state? He added, “Especially when there has been a lot prior effort to ferret out the facts through the chief information commissioner (CIC), etc. the university/college certificates/records are most important.”
I decided to chat with Roshan, something that I do with friends during morning tea. And this is what he told me: That the image the “Mirror” story carries, of Modi’s roll number, has a different data of birth, August 29, 1949, than the one Modi has officially declared as his own, September 17, 1950, and that this was the “new evidence” suggesting documents had been “recreated”. He chatted on: “It looks like records that didn’t exist are fabricated now.” Soon, a well-known media site “broke” the story of “different birth date”, quoting Roshan.
And this was followed by Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil hurriedly calling a press conference on Sunday in Ahmedabad, questioning Modi’s real birth date. “Does it befit a Prime Minister that he lies on such issues?”, he asked, wondering, “His family claims that a wrong birthday was entered into his school records because his mother was not educated does not make sense, because Modi’s family has consistently claimed that Modi’s birth date in janma patri also is 1950. Why were different birth dates used by Modi at different periods of his life?”
The date of birth struck me, August 29… Wasn’t August 31 the cut-off birth date for admitting children in Gujarat schools during the good old days when Modi may have been got enrolled in school? Confirmed an expert on primary education, “True, August 31 used to be the official cutoff date of birth for admission under the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1949. This Act was in force in the Bombay State before Gujarat became a separate state in 1960, and remained in force thereafter, too.”
A veteran commentator on social issues suspected that Modi’s parents “may have” got entered August 29 as the date of birth in their enthusiasm to get him admitted before he actually acquired the age to be enrolled in school. “There’s nothing unusual here, it was common, especially in regions which, before Independence, were under the Gaedwad rulers’ Baroda State, where primary school admission was compulsory”, he added.
Meanwhile, I can already notice a simmering discomfort among Modi’s critics in Gujarat over what they term as “unnecessary controversy” on Modi’s academic qualifications and, now, date of birth. Sukhdev Patel, whom I respect more as a child rights activist despite his recent meanderings into politics, said, “I don’t understand why such issues are gaining so much publicity when there are so many issues to agitate on – failure of public distribution system, right to food, rising unemployment which has led to the recent Patel agitation, to name just a few.” Well-known political analyst Achyut Yagnik, taking a similar view, said, “Congress people seem to be have stopped applying their mind. That’s why they are coming up non-issues.”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/modis-educational-qualifications-an-unnecessary-controversy/

Comments

TRENDING

Strange rituals observed around Diwali and Gujarati new year amidst celebrations

While the fever around that the Gujarati new year, Bestu Varas, which fell on the next day of Diwali, November 1, has still not fully subsided, with noise of crackers still heard in the urban area where I live, what appears strange to me how on the eve of every Diwali is how superstitions take round among believers. One of these I noticed is, people cook some bit of food on a day before Diwali, which is called Kali Chaudas, and place it on the crossroads.

Rs 2 treatment for cancer? Treat with utter caution, especially many times forwards on WhatsApp on this

The other day when I received a WhatsApp forward (it said "forwarded many times"), I got terribly worked up, even though I shouldn't have done it. I generally don't like such forwards as these seek to spread rumours. In fact, shouting out, I said, "Another nonsense from WhatsApp University... Why forward such unverified things?"

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

  A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.

India's 78% firms think achieving net zero is cost to business, 52% say it's risky: Report

 A leading global management consulting firm working with more than three-quarters of the Fortune Global 500, as well as with government bodies and nonprofit organizations, has said that while vast majority of Indian businesses surveyed (91%) claim they have set targets to reach net zero, with 51% of them viewing these targets as “highly achievable”, ironically, most of them (78%) consider sustainability as a cost to business rather than opportunity.

Anti-Rupala Rajputs 'have no support' of numerically strong Kshatriya communities

Personally, I have no love lost for Purshottam Rupala, though I have known him ever since I was posted as the Times of India representative in Gandhinagar in 1997, from where I was supposed to do political reporting. In news after he made the statement that 'maharajas' succumbed to foreign rulers, including the British, and even married off their daughters them, there have been large Rajput rallies against him for “insulting” the community.

Instilling sense of insecurity among 'fearful' millions, Modi to win comfortably

  This was one of the most interesting reports I read on the Lok Sabha elections. Titled, "If Sangam Pilgrims Are Bellwether, They Indicate Clear Majority for Modi",  published  in what is considered to be an anti-Narendra Modi site, "The Wire", it reports on interaction with boatmen and pilgrims from across India, even as pointing towards why Modi would get a "clear majority."

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s  fourth session  of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.