Skip to main content

Modi’s educational qualifications — An unnecessary controversy

Ever since the controversy – if can be called that – broke out last year about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BA and MA degrees, I had been informally telling some of those involved in questioning his educational qualifications, including Ahmedabad-based political activist Roshan Shah and a few scribes, that, what I know for sure is, he was an MA student in Gujarat University. I am naming Roshan – whom I have found to be a fine person with good insights into local Gujarat issues, and a keen campaigner against Modi and Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel on social media (something Modi’s opponents utterly lack) – because he was a kingpin in raising this and similar such controversies, citing RTI pleas and complaints.
Not that doubts about Modi’s educational qualifications did not exist earlier. They did exist even in my mind after he became Gujarat chief minister. Yet, these doubts seemed to have got cleared, when during an informal gathering, I asked Dinesh Shukla, a veteran retired professor of political science at the Gujarat University, what the reality was. I vaguely remembered what Professor Shukla told me more than a decade ago: “Modi was my student in MA political science, he used to attend classes, but I don’t know where he disappeared later.”
Following the latest controversy, I decided to again approach Professor Shukla, just to be doubly sure. After all, I have always respected him as one of the handful Gujarat-based academics with a strong human rights slant. And this is what he told me: “Yes, it is true, I told you that. Modi did attend MA part one classes, but was irregular. He lacked attendance, as did many other students in the class, hence I and my colleagues decided to complete their attendance registers in such a way that they could appear in the examination. However, never saw him in MA part two. There are now newspaper reports which say that he became an external student.”
On Sunday morning, I thought, the controversy had ended. Even as Arvind Kejriwal awaited facts on Modi’s educational qualifications, “Ahmedabad Mirror” carried a story that Modi “completed his masters in political science with a score of 62.3 per cent in 1983” from Gujarat University, citing official records. But I was proved wrong.
In my eagerness to prove that I was right, I posted on Facebook, saying the “unnecessary controversy should end” following the “Mirror” story. No sooner came a reply from Jawaharlal Nehru University’s well-known Prof Kamal Mitra Chenoy, a very insightful academic whom I have known since my student days: “It is elementary that in such controversies, one cannot rely wholly on one article from a prominent newspaper from the same politician’s state.” It sounds strange, I thought. Why doubt a Gujarat-based daily just because it happens to be from Modi’s state? He added, “Especially when there has been a lot prior effort to ferret out the facts through the chief information commissioner (CIC), etc. the university/college certificates/records are most important.”
I decided to chat with Roshan, something that I do with friends during morning tea. And this is what he told me: That the image the “Mirror” story carries, of Modi’s roll number, has a different data of birth, August 29, 1949, than the one Modi has officially declared as his own, September 17, 1950, and that this was the “new evidence” suggesting documents had been “recreated”. He chatted on: “It looks like records that didn’t exist are fabricated now.” Soon, a well-known media site “broke” the story of “different birth date”, quoting Roshan.
And this was followed by Congress spokesperson Shaktisinh Gohil hurriedly calling a press conference on Sunday in Ahmedabad, questioning Modi’s real birth date. “Does it befit a Prime Minister that he lies on such issues?”, he asked, wondering, “His family claims that a wrong birthday was entered into his school records because his mother was not educated does not make sense, because Modi’s family has consistently claimed that Modi’s birth date in janma patri also is 1950. Why were different birth dates used by Modi at different periods of his life?”
The date of birth struck me, August 29… Wasn’t August 31 the cut-off birth date for admitting children in Gujarat schools during the good old days when Modi may have been got enrolled in school? Confirmed an expert on primary education, “True, August 31 used to be the official cutoff date of birth for admission under the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1949. This Act was in force in the Bombay State before Gujarat became a separate state in 1960, and remained in force thereafter, too.”
A veteran commentator on social issues suspected that Modi’s parents “may have” got entered August 29 as the date of birth in their enthusiasm to get him admitted before he actually acquired the age to be enrolled in school. “There’s nothing unusual here, it was common, especially in regions which, before Independence, were under the Gaedwad rulers’ Baroda State, where primary school admission was compulsory”, he added.
Meanwhile, I can already notice a simmering discomfort among Modi’s critics in Gujarat over what they term as “unnecessary controversy” on Modi’s academic qualifications and, now, date of birth. Sukhdev Patel, whom I respect more as a child rights activist despite his recent meanderings into politics, said, “I don’t understand why such issues are gaining so much publicity when there are so many issues to agitate on – failure of public distribution system, right to food, rising unemployment which has led to the recent Patel agitation, to name just a few.” Well-known political analyst Achyut Yagnik, taking a similar view, said, “Congress people seem to be have stopped applying their mind. That’s why they are coming up non-issues.”
---
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/true-lies/modis-educational-qualifications-an-unnecessary-controversy/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Surprised? Communist candidate in Ahmedabad bypoll in a Hindutva bastion

On October 11, 2019 morning, as I was scanning through daily news online (I don’t read papers now), I found that both BJP and Congress candidates from Ahmedabad’s Amraiwadi assembly constituency, which fell vacant following the victory of its BJP MLA in the Lok Sabha polls, have been asked to explain as to why they had cash in hand for election campaign, and why they did not deposit their money in a bank account. Fighting the bypoll, BJP’s Jagdish Patel and Congress’ Dharmendra Patel had declared they possessed Rs 1.81 lakh and Rs 1.70 lakh as cash in hand, respectively, for election expenditure.

Tree-felling for greenery? Gujarat govt 'accepted' proposal; awaits implementation

The other day, I went to Nadiad, a town in Central Gujarat, about 55 kilometres from Ahmedabad. For a change, I took an alternate route, which falls between two toll roads – the Expressway and the National Highway. What surprised me was, I saw truckloads of wooden logs moving to and fro on this state highway soon after I left Ahmedabad. I was immediately reminded of a "tree enthusiast" I had met in 2007. Introduced by former chief secretary PK Laheri, who was then chairman of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd (SSNNL), Jayantibhai Lakdawala came to my Times of India office in Gandhinagar with a unique proposal, which, he said, he had put up before the Gujarat government to grow more trees.

What was wrong with Rahul Gandhi's Chowkidar chor hai campaign?

A few days back, I came across an interesting Facebook post by Vinod Chand, an FB friend. I always read his comments with great interest. This one was on Rahul Gandhi launching what he called “a broadside on Narendra Modi” during the initial phase of the campaign during the last Lok Sabha polls -- “Chowkidar chor hai.” However, during the later phase of the campaign the slogan appeared to have been dropped, not because it seemed derogatory, but perhaps because it was not having the “desired impact.”

When Gandhi said Congress can 'only die with the nation'; warned of its weedy growth

I don’t recall when, why and how, but I have been under the impression for decades that Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress dissolved after India attained Independence. However, a few days ago, I was pleasantly surprised on seeing a Facebook post by Hari Desai, a well-known Gujarati journalist and a Sardar Patel expert, putting on record and claiming that this, indeed, was never the case. Desai released the photograph of “Harijan”, edited by Gandhi himself, dated February 1, 1948, which carried an article by Gandhi written on January 27, 1948, three days before he was murdered, clearly stating that the “Indian National Congress ... cannot be allowed to die”, and that it can “only die with the nation.”

A top Gujarat High Court lawyer who lived and worked for the underprivileged

When I came to Ahmedabad to join as assistant editor of the Times of India in 1993, I didn’t know Girish Patel was a senior advocate of the Gujarat High Court. Apart from assisting the then editor, Tushar Bhatt, my job was to specifically look after the editorial page, which also meant I should be selecting from among the letters to the editor that we would get, edit them appropriately, and put them in the Letters to the Editor column.

Nitish Kumar a 'Modi-fied' chief minister 'refusing' to hark to reason

Yesterday, I came across an unusual Facebook post by my veteran journalist colleague, Law Kumar Mishra. It recalls an incident which took place when Mishra was posted in Rajkot as the Times of India correspondent during of the worst droughts in the region in late 1980s. At that time Amarsinh Chaudhury was Gujarat chief minister. Currently Patna, Mishra compares how Chaudhary handled drought with the way Nitish Kumar has been handling Bihar floods.

Enlightened Buddha didn't want monks to get enchanted by the glance of a woman

Some of my Dalit friends, including Martin Macwan, whom I respect as one of the best human rights activists I have met, have a great fascination for Buddhism. Nearly all Dalit rallies or functions I have attended carry with them Buddha’s photographs. Probably, one reason could be that Dalit icon Babasaheb Ambedkar converted to Buddhism because he believed this was the only religion of India which does not believe in casteism. Many Dalits, not without reason, get converted to Buddhism.

Attack on Gandhi: Where diehard Left and extreme Right appear to meet

Another Gandhi Jayanti has come and gone. Several of the top comments – some which we also published in www.counterview.net – on this occasion hovered around US president Donald Trump calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi “father of India”. Perhaps things wouldn’t have taken a turn that it did had not Modi’s “diehard” followers like Union minister Jitendra Singh going so far as to say that those who “do not feel proud” of Trump’s comment that Modi is the “father of India”, do not consider themselves Indians.

The enigma called Amit Shah

Those were turbulent days. It was, I remember, second half of March 2002. The post-Godhra riots in Ahmedabad, as elsewhere in Gujarat, may have lost their intensity, but rioting had still not stopped. It was my first meeting with Amit Shah, Gujarat’s former minister of state for home, who has shot into prominence after the CBI arrested him in 2010 allegedly for being an accomplice in a triple murder case, involving the fake encounter of a gangster, Sohrabuddin Sheikh, his wife Kauserbi, and aide Tulsiram Prajapati. At that time, he was MLA from what then was one of the largest state assembly constituencies, Sarkhej, in Ahmedabad, with a voters’ strength of 10 lakh. All that I knew of him was, he was “very popular” in his constituency, almost invincible. He had just met chief minister Narendra Modi, and I had a very vague idea on his proximity to Modi, who had taken over reins in Gujarat.
Shah was coming out of the chief minister’s office (CMO), situated on the fifth floor of Block No…

Why Gujarat imposed mobile internet curfew during the Patel agitation

It was Wednesday, October 31, 1984. After finalizing the semi-left Link newsweekly, for which I worked then, the office driver boldly drove the Ambassador late at night through Delhi streets, which were already in the grip of anti-Sikh riots, erupted following the assassination of Indira Gandhi. The driver squeezed his way through burning vehicles. At several places we could see houses in flames and heard painful, shrieking voices. It was a ghastly scenario, of the type I had never witnessed, or even imagined, before. I reached home, a middle class South Delhi locality; to my consolation all was quiet, though we had a Sikh neighbour.