Skip to main content

High-octane comic satire on Gujarat cops influenced by colonial 'criminal tribes' law

Community leader Chhanalal with Raghlo, the petty thief
Released across Gujarat and Mumbai last Friday, not unexpectedly, “Kamthaan”, a Gujarati feature film based Ashwinee Bhatt’s novel, has received wide appreciation from the audience as well as the media for action, direction and production. While the Times of India, in a review, has given it 4 out of 5 stars to the movie, calling it “out-and-out comedy”, replete with “laugh riot”, individuals from Gujarati industry are quoted as appreciating the movie with “applause”.
Social media has appreciative comments ranging from Modi bhakt actors Manoj Joshi and Paresh Rawal, to top Dalit rights leader and Congress MLA Jignesh Mevani. Set in an imaginative small town of Central Gujarat and timed around 2000, when BJP chief minister Keshubhai Patel ruled the state, there is nothing to complain about the manner in which the Harfanmaula Films produced the movie -- acting, direction, story telling.
What, however, appears to be missing in the wide appreciation the movie initially received is the powerful message it seeks to offer: Much like the Harfanmaula Films’ previous release, “Hellaro” (2019), “Kamthaan” too centres around the rebellious nature of a subaltern social group which seeks to find ways, in its own crude style, to rebel against an oppressive social order.
If in “Hellaro”, which means “outburst” in English, it is the women in a remote village who rebel against the patriarchal social order which does not allow them to dance to the tune of garba, in “Kamthaan” (roughly “chaos” in English), it is a denotified tribe (DNT), dubbed by a 19th century British law as “criminal”, for seeking to rebel against corrupt and casteist police officialdom. It’s quite another thing that “Hellaro”, set in 1975 in a rural backdrop, is a serious film, while “Kamthaan”, set in 2000 in small town backdrop, is a hilarious comedy, a satirical comment on the corrupt officialdom.
Rathod with his junior cops
While the British law calling about 200 DNT tribes as “criminal” may have been repealed, “Kamthaan” reveals a glaring fact: that the colonial legacy continues among cops in Gujarat, as elsewhere, till today. Such is the legacy that of all persons Kiran Bedi in controversial tweet in 2016 called people from ex-criminal tribes as "hardcore professionals in committing crimes" – which she had to later apologise following protests.
It is in this backdrop that the movie goes out of the way to use the so-called criminal nature of the tribe to point out how the community seeks to project how small time theft is used a rugged way to resist the power-that-be, especially the police administration, which openly discriminates against it. One of the dialogues in the movie says it all: “Nana manas na haathe lakhato hoye, tyare khabar na hoy ke itihas rachahyi rahyo che”, suggesting, people from ordinary background aren’t aware that they are the makers of history.
The movie revolves around a petty thief, Raghlo, in a midnight attempt, creeps into the just-promoted police sub-inspector Rathod’s house via his semi-pucca rooftop. Sensing that he has entered the wrong house, aghast, he first lights a lamp before a picture of Lord Hanuman, hanging on the wall, expresses regret with folded hand, but finally gathers courage and runs away from the rooftop hole he had created with the cop’s uniform, pistol, medals, and some cash.
If the theft in the town’s top cop’s house, where he temporarily lives even as he awaits getting a police quarter, puts the entire policedom in a quandary, the act is seen as a valiant move by community leader Chhanalal. While Raghlo is terrified about the consequences he might suffer from for burgling into the house of a top policeman, Chhanalal calls it a “valiant act”, which he believes greatly adds to the glory of the community, which is targeted by the town’s casteist cops.
The theft, in fact, is seen as symbolising revenge against the custodial death of a community youth in the past. Replete with instances of how the police sub-inspector’s juniors in the town police station scheme in order to identify and catch the thief without filing an FIR, or revealing that the theft had taken place in the house of the sub-inspector, the movie shows how the junior cops seek to scheme, use pressure if needed, to keep it a secret, even as seeking regular “hafta” (bribe).
The movie’s flashpoint comes in the form of a “Parsang” (Prasang or occasion), in which  community people and cops gather. It is organised by Chhanalal, ostensibly to celebrate Raghlo’s valiant act of thieving in the house of the town’s topcop. The event coincides with the worried poor petty thief getting is daughter married. Ghanshyam Zula, a Kutchi folk singer, is seen singing a song, which continuously repeats the words “daru ni dhaar...” (flow of liquor) in a state where prohibition rules the roost.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.