Skip to main content

Extremist tag for a person whom I considered my friend, philosopher, guide? Terrible!

The other day I met someone I had never met, though this relative happens to be a very distant relative. I had heard a lot about him. This gentleman, whom I met at another of my relative's place, once happened to be a friend of top Gujarat activist Achyut Yagnik, who passed away in August. This gentleman is a US citizen though was in Ahmedabad recently. 
I had heard about hm from Achyutbhai many a time. He would tell me how nice this gentleman was, though only to add, "He is quite conservative."
I informed this elderly man about the death of his old friend and showed him on my mobile a blog -- an obituary -- I had written on Achyutbhai. This gentleman only, "I didn't know he had died." After I told him that I always regarded Achyutbhai as my friend, philosopher and guide, his reaction totally took me aback. "Achyut was an extremist. He would write anything without caring about anyone", he said, even when he was preparing to leave for the US.
An extremist tag for a person who always called a spade a spade? I didn't understand how those who are so well qualified could be so careless. All that I told this gentleman was: Achyutbhai, a journalist who worked with Gujarat Samachar during the initial days of his career, had written two excellent books, one on history of Gujarat, and another on the history of Ahmedabad, both of which I reviewed in The Times of India during my TOI days.
This gentleman, who must be about the same age as Achyutbhai, 77, when the latter passed away, showed no interest in all this, but commented, "He changed his name from Jayendra Jani to Achyut Yagnik for writing what he wrote"!

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.