Skip to main content

Nov 14 luncheon for journalists and leaders wasn't meant to remember Nehru: Congress leader

It was with a welcome surprise that I received a reaction from Gujarat Congress chief Shaktisinh Gohil objecting to my blog titled “When Congress leaders in Gujarat forgot to remember Jawaharlal Nehru on November 14”. I hadn’t sent a link of the blog to anyone, not to talk of Gohil or any other Congress person. I was glad: this suggests that he or some of his colleagues have been following my blogs and articles in Counterview.
Be that as it may, Gohil, sharply reacting to my blog where I had said that Nehru wasn’t recalled or his presence wasn’t felt at the luncheon organised for journalists and party leaders on Nehru’s 135th birthday, noted: this is not true, Nehru was “remembered” earlier in the morning before luncheon – at public function at Bal Vatika, Kankaria, for children, and at the Gujarat state party office in Ahmedabad. “We offered floral tributes to his statue and his portrait”, he added. 
Sending across photographs to me along with two voice messages (click here and here), Gohil claimed, there was “huge gathering” at these functions. “We have tweeted about this” (click here for the tweet), he said, sending across the tweet as well.

“Your blog says Nehru was not remembered is not true”, he insisted twice, adding, the blog will not go show his party in poor light; rather my credibility will suffer. As for luncheon, where Nehru wasn’t recalled on November 14, he said, it was a “get together, there was no mike, hence there was no question of remembering(sic!).”
Reacting to the blog’s point that two desks had Rahul Gandhi’s photographs with Congress leaders, Gohil said, many Congress persons as also journalists had wanted themselves to be clicked when “Rahul ji had come to Gujarat during his padyatra... There was a request to provide the photographs. Hence we displayed them on the two desks, so that those who had clicked with Rahul ji could take their photographs. Many did this...”
I have uploaded all the photographs that he sent me, as also the screenshot of the tweet he sent me, to allow readers to judge for themselves as to how big (or “huge”) were the gatherings.
Following his first voice message, I specifically asked Gohil to answer in writing several questions which were:

  1. Can you tell me why there was no Nehru at the luncheon, none; including you, remembered him; nor was there a photo; when I asked what's the occasion today, he wasn't even "remembered", while Rahul was there? That too on November 14?
  2. Did you hold any public functions to remember Nehru? Priyanka Gandhi did this in Delhi. 
  3. What's Gujarat Congress doing to counter the all round smear campaign currently on against Nehru?
Instead of sending a written reply, what followed was the second voice message (which was okay), where Gohil also said, generally he doesn’t react to such criticisms, which many journalists make, but since he respects me, he is sending across what all the Congress leadership did in Gujarat to remember Nehru on November 14.
“It is journalists who make false claims about us lose credibility”, he concluded.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published.

TRENDING

The dye is caste in Gujarat

I think it was 1994 when I first met Japanese scholar Takashi Shinoda, an Indologist, during my routine visit to the Sardar Patel Institute of Economic and Social Research, Ahmedabad, at that time still known for some quality research. Once headed such academics of highest order such as DT Lakdawala and YK Alagh, the institute has since collapsed – at least this is what I learn from Gujarat’s academic circles, with whom I had developed good rapport before I was shifted to Gandhinagar to report on government affairs for the Times of India in 1997. Unassuming, Shinoda took me to the institute canteen for tea, and told me of his latest area of interest – social mobility and occupational diversification of different castes over several decades. What he told me was indeed of great interest to me – that Gujarat’s “enterprising” Patels, who I thought till then were mainly a farming community, had still not overtaken the Banias in business. However, he underlined, “The way things are happening...
Post a Comment
»

Jay Somnath

Kanhaiyalal Maneklal Munshi This is what happened several decades ago, when I was a small school-going child. Every summer, accompanied with my mother, I would come down from Delhi to spend the two-month-long holiday at my maternal uncle’s place in the posh Panchvati area of Ahmedabad. Each weekend, my uncle would take us for a ride in his grand old black car. I think it was Chevrolet. I would wait eagerly for the weekend, as I had virtually nothing to do for the rest of the days. In the evenings, I mostly play in the open ground with the neighbouring children, but for rest of the time, as if, I was under strict, almost loving, control of my grandma, whom all of the children of the family called Baa. Especially after the dinner, which would be pretty early, she would make it a point to entertain us – mainly me and my cousin – by playing bezique. During one such summer, Baa decided to give us a strong injection of nationalism. She took in her hand Kanhaiyalal Maneklal Munshi’s well-kno...
Post a Comment
»

China's hukou and India's caste: A comparison that ignores the Jianmin

The other day, I saw an interesting article, "Does China have a caste system or is it a figment of imagination of Indians?" It wonders whether "China, the world's manufacturing powerhouse and a socialist state governed by a Communist party", has a birth-based caste system that shapes access to education, healthcare, and opportunity.
1 comment
»