Skip to main content

Gujarat govt admits of slow progress in land allocation to tribal farmers

In a sharp admission, a Gujarat government resolution (GR) has said that there has been "slow progress" in measuring land under the possession of tribal farmers in South Gujarat, one reason why there is a failure to hand over cultivation rights to them under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006.
Under FRA, 2006, those cultivating forest land as on December 13, 2005 would become rightful owners of the land their land.
The GR, which is based on a recent meeting held in Gandhinagar Sachivalaya, with the participation senior officials of forest and tribal departments, heard the state tribal secretary as admitting that "there has been strong opposition from the local people of Tapi and Valsad disricts" to measurements by the agencies appointed by the state government to carry on the job, one reason for the slow progress.
"There is lack of support", the GR, a copy of which is with Counterview, admits, adding, "As a result, officials are unable to enter villages, leading to law and order problems.”
The GR talks of "solving" the problem by taking the help of senior police officials to ensure early land measurement and provide cultivation rights.
Gujarat govt GR
The Gujarat government's sharp admission about "slow progress" in measuring tribal farmers' land comes amidst of an Ahmedabad-based NGO, Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), working in the field of social lawyering, collecting information of rejected claims of 142 tribals from South Gujarat's predominantly tribal Dangs district.
The rejected claims – copies of which are with Counterview – show that the official wordings for all rejections are identical for each of the 142 official letters sent to tribal farmers. In fact, each of the official letters appear to have been photocopied and sent out to each of the 142 claimants.
Each of the official letters says that the tribal farmer has “failed” to provide (1) at least two proofs showing that the land was being cultivated before December 13, 2006, as required by FRA, 2006, and (2) the satellite imagery does prove that the land was under cultivation before that date.
Explains CSJ's senior activist Azima Girach, “First of all, it is not necessary to provide the satellite imagery. In fact, the satellite imagery, under the law, is to be used as a proof only if other proofs are not available. Secondly, as you can see in the claim letters, not two, but several proofs have been provided to show that the land was being cultivated before December 13, 2005.”
A random examination of the official letters rejecting the claims show that the proofs include, apart from the caste certificate, the voter ID card, the ration card, the housing tax bill, the village elder's certificate, the witness' certificate, the proof of land development and tree cultivation, official spot inquiry proof, and the photograph of the cultivated land.
Says Girach, “As the matter for all the 142 cases is pending since 2011, the tribals are willing to approach the court of law against such en-mass rejection. We believe there must be many more such cases.”
GPS image of tribal land
Another NGO, Ekalavya Sangathan, making a spot inquiry based on GPS mapping in tribal-dominated Dahod district's village Parmarni Khakhariya village, Limkhed taluka, has found that out of 165 tribal cultivators, just 31 land rights have been cleared, while a whopping 134 claims have been rejected.
Claims Paulomee Mistry of Eklavya Sangathan, "Each of the tribals provided valid proof, and our GPS mapping proves that. The GPS file which we have resubmitted for reconsideration provides details of farmers' record book, map from Google Earth, GPS map, and GPS statement of measurement."
Meanwhile, facts provided by the Adivasi Kisan Sangharsh Morcha (AKSM), working in South Gujarat, show (click HERE to read) that just about 10,363 tribals received cultivation land rights certificate during the period. Till now, AKSM says, in Gujarat 73,921 tribal farmers have received cultivation rights, while 1,08,948 claims are still pending.
Comments AKSM's Romel Sutariya, “The state tribal department GR accusing the tribals for opposing land measurement is a cowardly. It only shows that the state BJP rulers are desperate in gaining tribal votes ahead of the Gujarat state assembly elections, scheduled for December 2017.”

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.