Skip to main content

Slowdown impact: Joblessness in India may cross 8%, people quitting labour market

 
A 30-day moving average of the unemployment rate during most of the first week of March 2020 was over 8 per cent, even though the ended with an unemployment rate of 7.71 per cent, Mahesh Vyas, managing director and CEO of one of India’s top consulting firms, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), has said.
In a recent analysis of the unemployment situation, the top expert says, “The unemployment rate has been rising steadily for over two years now”, and while till recently it looked like it would settle at a shade below 8 per cent, it seems that “the rate could rise to more than 8 per cent.”
Suggesting that it is possible to say there is “a limit to the increase in the unemployment rate”, however, he adds, what is particularly alarming is, “After a point, people get so discouraged by not finding jobs that they exit the labour markets”, leading to “a rather incongruous impact of a fall in the unemployment rate.”
According to Vyas, “If people who cannot find jobs stop looking for jobs, they are quitting the labour markets and in doing so, they are reducing the count of the unemployed and thereby reducing the unemployment rate.” However he says, this type of decline in the unemployment rate “is not a good sign.”
In fact, he says, “It is worse than an increasing unemployment rate. This is what has been happening in India. The labour participation rate has been falling. And, given the poor prospects of growth, this is likely to continue to happen.”
“The labour participation rate in February was 42.6 per cent”, Vyas says, adding, “In the last week of the month it had dropped to 42 per cent. The 30-day moving average labour participation rate has been falling since February 20. In the first week of March 2020 it was 42.14 per cent.”
Further, notes Vyas, “There is an additional reason why the labour participation rate may decline. This is because the quality of employment is deteriorating. The emerging composition of employment indicates a decline in good quality jobs and an increase in risky employment choices.”
Thus, “During 2019, there was a big increase, of 8 million, in the count of self-employed entrepreneurs. At the same time, salaried jobs declined by 1 million. A salaried job is arguably, the most preferred kind of employment. When these jobs decline, labour has few choices.”
What is also worrisome, Vyas says, is that during 2019, there was also an increase in the number of farmers, pointing out, “Farming is risky business which has required additional support from the central government and several state governments. Farming is not the first choice for employment of any young graduate. It can be either disguised unemployment or a compulsion.”
Then, he says, “New risks have emerged in the form of the Covid-19 virus. This threatens to shutdown economic activity in many pockets of the world. This could disrupt some supply chains in India and it has started to impact tourism and hospitality industries which are significant providers of employment.”

Comments

TRENDING

Did the Sabarmati riverfront make Ahmedabad more vulnerable?

  Currently living in Los Angeles, I find myself missing Ahmedabad . Not because I miss living through the city's recent devastating floods—which, experts say, resulted from a combination of extreme meteorological events and chronic urban infrastructure bottlenecks—but because I am unable to make an on-the-spot assessment of the disaster.

Paradox of Stanford's Hoover Institute: Freedom from Communism, but freedom for whom?

A few days ago, we went to San Francisco, ordinarily a six-hour drive from Los Angeles. However, it took us more than eight hours because a fire had broken out on one of the mountains along the highway, forcing us to take another route, part of which ran along the seashore.

India’s growth story meets a stark wealth divide: billionaires gain as top 1% owns 40% of wealth

India’s rapid economic expansion is accompanied by an increasingly concentrated distribution of wealth, raising fresh questions over how fheadline GDP figures reflect the economic reality of ordinary Indians. A two yearold social-media post by former bureaucrat Anil Swarup , founder chairman of Nexus of Good , has resurrected a debate over the gap between India’s aggregate economic size and the wealth held by its richest citizens. Swarup argues that looking only at GDP per capita can obscure the extent to which wealth is concentrated among a small section of the population.