Skip to main content

When will Church walk an extra mile for animals, most vulnerable of creations?

By Jay Ihsan* 

Ruskin Bond, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Flannery O’Connor, Virginia Woolf, Ernest Hemingway, Lord Byron, Gertrude Stein and Freddie Mercury – each one of them had a deep affinity for animals.
Then there is the Bible which says “all animals are created by God and sustained by Him. God placed the care of animals into human hands.”
The Bible’s call has unfortunately fallen on deaf ears, as my experiences attest.
When I some years back urged a church-going neighbour to spay her three cats, she replied: “My husband said cats are not priority.”
So I offered to pay for the procedure. Reason being I could not bear knowing the cats’ were eventually abandoned with their kittens because they “are not priority”.
When a Malaysian lawyer Rajesh Nagarajan in May this year challenged the Animal Welfare Board to disclose its activities since its formation seven years ago, the handful of support he received was from individuals who care and respect animals.
Rajesh and his team filed the discovery suit against the board after it remained defiant in not revealing its undertakings using the Official Secrets Act 1972 as a cover.
Why would an Animal Welfare Board scramble for protection under the OSA 1972 if no wrongdoing had been committed? By the way, this is not the first for Malaysia that funds meant for animal welfare have been embezzled by those entrusted with it.
The Animal Welfare Board is a statutory body under Parliament, established under Section 4 of the Animal Welfare Act 2015. It is responsible for monitoring establishments, providing education on and promoting animal welfare, as well as advising ministries on matters relating to animal welfare.
The Kuala Lumpur High Court has since ordered the board to reveal its activities, bringing some relief to a worried Rajesh as little was known about the Animal Welfare Board.
Back to the Bible. It has much to speak of animals. Yet, when it was time to lend support, the biblical analogies found no takers, not even with the Christian Federation of Malaysia (CFM).
(CFM was formed 1985 and is an ecunemical umbrella body in Malaysia that consists of the Council of Churches of Malaysia, National Evangelical Christian Fellowship and Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Malaysia).
The CFM instead promptly issued a statement on Aug 30, the eve of Malaysia’s 65th independence day, requesting that prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob not rush into holding the next general election. The federation cited various reasons but nothing that concerned animal welfare and rights.
Was speaking up against the Animal Welfare Board’s refusal to come clear on its pursuits not important for CFM? Or is animal welfare too insignificant an agenda for the federation?
The Bible speaks of some 120 species of animals with sheeps and goats given most prominence. The Noah’s Ark message needs no introduction.
So it is puzzling when the church appears to have lost interest in preserving the Bible’s concerns about animals, leaving it instead to individuals to do their bit to defend animal rights?
When the world struggled to make sense of life during the 2020-2021 Covid lockdown, did CFM remind Malaysians, creed and beliefs regardless, to care for street/community animals in whatever way possible?
How many churches, temples, gurdwaras and mosques in the country diligently remembered and continue to place bowls of water outside their gates to allow cats, dogs and birds to quench their thirst and in the process set an example for house owners and business premises to also do so?
How often do sermons in churches and other places of prayer touch on love and compassion for street animals and the need to speak up against animal abuse?
It was an eye opener for me when one hot evening in my overzealousness I ran up to a nun for consent to feed a street cat outside an unoccupied convent. She instead very sternly told me to do no such thing there.
That I was stunned is an understatement. A former student of the Convent of the Holy Infant Jesus mission school, I held the belief that safety, care and compassion were synonymous with nuns and vice-versa.
But my recent encounter with some of the nuns have left me aghast.
One morning at 5.30am as I was out for my walk, I heard the desperate cries of a kitten coming from the nuns’ residence/convent. I sought permission to look around their garden for the kitten but did not find any.
As I stepped out and looked inside the drain outside the convent, I saw the terrified kitten. I removed my shoes and got down the drain to rescue it.
Did the drama elicit any response from the nuns? No. They simply got into the car and drove off.
After three failed attempts, I contacted the fire brigade for help. They came soon after and managed to scoop up the kitten.
The nuns remained indifferent to the kitten’s fate. None bothered to enquire, just as they were unperturbed about the two dogs belonging to their neighbour, the Good Shepherd Catholic Seminary (GSCS), who were again left stranded outside, this time throughout one wet cold night. It was only after I alerted the police did the seminary buck up and become vigilant in ensuring both dogs remained safe indoors.
It will always baffle me as to why the nuns here remain unwilling to walk the extra mile for animals, the most vulnerable of creations? Has the church been inflicted with the ‘couldn’t care less” malaise notorious among Malaysians?
Or has the ‘I, me, mine’ narcissism crept into the church? Must the clergy and nuns be “assigned” to reach out to hungry, thirsty or sick street animals? This unlike their counterparts abroad who have no qualms bending over backwards to save or care for animals.
Whatever may be the case, my respect for nuns and church has since slipped out of the window.
I wonder though - had CFM been vocal about animal rights and the need to keep them safe, would the nuns have reflected compassion towards the terrified kitten and given GSCS an earful on keeping their dogs safe?
The federation instead in its August 30 statement hankered on the Malaysian Family propaganda, a brainchild of current prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob.
Do animals not feature in a “family”, Malaysian or not? Why did CFM make no mention of the need to take the Animal Welfare Board to task for failing to stay transparent and accountable in its endeavours and encourage Rajesh to strive for the truth?
Are animals, especially those who call the streets their home, not worthy of being part of the “Malaysian Family”? Need they “convert” and offer alms to houses of prayer to justify being loved?
Meanwhile, will CFM, clergy and nuns carry on with what they have been doing all along – look the other way when an animal pleads for help?
What about the Bible's call to be the "voice for the voiceless?" Proverbs 31:1-9: "Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy."
*Freelance journalist based in Malaysia



Still not dead and buried: A rural Punjab move to keep alive the spirit of Naxalbari

By Harsh Thakor  There was a well attended and most lively meeting in memory of Thana Singh of around 2000 persons in Thana Singh’s village of Bhallai Ana in community hall in Muktsar on September 17th, with most encouraging participation of youth. It was a testimony that the spirit of Naxalbari is still not dead and buried with the audience literally reverberating the message of Naxalbari. In spite of every effort of the state to crush the naxalbari movement, it is not dead and buried, as we witnessed here. I was privileged to participate in the event.

Dev Anand ably acted as westernised, urban educated, modern hero, as also anti-hero

By Harsh Thakor  On September 26th we celebrated the birth centenary of legendary actor Dev Anand. Dev Saab carved out a new epoch or made a path breaking contribution in portraying romanticism and action in Bollywood cinema, giving his style or mannerisms a new colour. Arguably no Bollywood star manifested glamour in such a dignified or serene manner or struck the core of an audience’s soul in romantic melodies. Possibly we missed this evergreen star being cast in a Hollywood film. Dev Anand is like an inextinguishable soul of Bollywood. Although not as artistic or intense as Dilip Kumar, Raj Kapoor or Ashok Kumar ,Dev Anand surpassed them all for liveliness or flamboyance, with his performances radiating g energy on the screen, in realms rarely transcended. In his own right, Dev Saab, was a craftsman, like his classical contemporaries, with a characteristic composure. Perhaps never was a Bollywood star so suave, bubbling or charming as Dev Anand, who often looked like an Indian versi

Ludicrous how Gandhi is ritually remembered by our leaders with broom in their hands

By Firoz Bakht Ahmed  On every Gandhi Jayanti day, ludicrous scenes of multi-hued political parties’ leaders with brooms in their hands are seen doing rounds on television commemorating Mahatma Gandhi regarding “swachhta” (cleanliness). This won’t do unless there’s cleansing of heart followed by the cleanliness of the poor voters’ stinking areas. Tragedy with Mahatma Gandhi is that he is just ritually remembered by us on the occasion of his anniversaries but he is worth remembering each day owing to his sagacious words that contain wisdom for all ages and in all times.

Abrogation of Art 370: Increasing alienation, relentless repression, simmering conflict

One year after the abrogation by the Central Government of Art. 370 in Kashmir, what is the situation in the Valley. Have the promises of peace, normalcy and development been realised? What is the current status in the Valley? Here is a detailed note by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties , “Jammu & Kashmir: One Year after Abrogation of Art. 370: Increasing Alienation, Relentless Repression, Simmering Conflict”:

Why Govt of India, Sangh Parivar want to stop the use of ‘India’? What's in a name?

By Ram Puniyani  Coincidentally after the opposition parties came together to form INDIA (Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance), the ruling BJP is desisting from the use of word India in official communiqués and its parent organizations RSS has issued a fatwa that only word Bharat should be used for our country. While inviting the representative’s participants of G 20, the President issued the invitation in the name of ‘Rashtrapati of Bharat’. Since then BJP is on the track of avoiding the use of the word India in all its pronouncements, saying this word smacks of colonial legacy since this word was given to the country by British colonial rulers. Mr. Hemant Biswa Sarma of BJP said that word India is part of the colonial legacy and should be removed. RSS chief and other functionaries have intensified this message. Speaking at a function at Guwahati Mr. Bhagwat, stated “We must stop using the word India and start using Bharat. At times we use India to make those who speak Eng

Why originality of Gandhi's thoughts, example of his life still inspire people world over

By Moin Qazi*  Mahatma Gandhi's birth anniversary reopens a familiar debate around his legacy every year. How could a frail man use his moral strength to galvanize 400 million Indians in their struggle for independence from the mighty British Empire? How did Gandhi inspire ordinary people to turn fear into fearlessness and anger into love? What were his tools for fighting colonialism? How could he inspire the world to embrace his philosophy of nonviolence? What can we learn from him today? And is he still relevant?

Pot calling the kettle black: EAM Jaishankar accusing Global North of double standards

By Chandra Vikash*  While addressing a Ministerial Session on Saturday 23 September 2023 in New York on the sidelines of the ongoing UN General Assembly session titled ‘South Rising: Partnerships, Institutions and Ideas’, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that economically dominant countries are leveraging production capabilities and those who have institutional influence have weaponized these capabilities. He also cited an example of Covid-19 and stressed that it is still a world of double standards."

In today’s India aggressive violence has become weapon of choice for buying peace

By Harasankar Adhikari  Mahatma (the great soul) Gandhi's vision stands for "ahimsa" (non-violence) and ‘Satyagraha’ (holding of the truth). It is absolutely the beacon of his spirituality. His searches for peace and bliss are within the realm of ahimsa and satyagraha. Although his works are confined to the political movement for India's freedom as the political leader, his lifelong practise is enshrined as the political saint of India( according to Swami Yogananda Paramhans). His devotion and self-sacrifice for the universe are the revelation of his sainthood. 

How the slogan Jai Bhim gained momentum as movement of popularity and revolution

By Dr Kapilendra Das*  India is an incomprehensible plural country loaded with diversities of religions, castes, cultures, languages, dialects, tribes, societies, costumes, etc. The Indians have good manners/etiquette (decent social conduct, gesture, courtesy, politeness) that build healthy relationships and take them ahead to life. In many parts of India, in many situations, and on formal occasions, it is common for people of India to express and exchange respect, greetings, and salutation for which we people usually use words and phrases like- Namaskar, Namaste, Pranam, Ram Ram, Jai Ram ji, Jai Sriram, Good morning, shubha sakal, Radhe Radhe, Jai Bajarangabali, Jai Gopal, Jai Jai, Supravat, Good night, Shuvaratri, Jai Bhole, Salaam walekam, Walekam salaam, Radhaswami, Namo Buddhaya, Jai Bhim, Hello, and so on.

Regretful: Kapil Dev retired not leaving Indian cricket with integrity he upheld

By Harsh Thakor  Kapil Dev scaled heights as an entertainer and a player upholding the spirit of the game almost unparalleled in his era. In his time he was cricket’s ultimate mascot of sportsmanship On his day Kapil could dazzle in all departments to turn the tempo of game in the manner of a Tsunami breaking in. He radiated r energy, at a level rarely scaled in his era on a cricket field. Few ever blended aggression with artistry so comprehenisively. Although fast medium, he could be as daunting with the ball as the very best, with his crafty outswinger, offcutter, slower ball and ball that kicked from a good length. Inspite of bowling on docile tracks on the subcontinent, Kapil had 434 scalps, with virtually no assistance. I can never forget how he obtained pace and movement on flat pancakes, trapping the great Vivian Richards in Front or getting Geoff Boycott or Zaheer Abbas caught behind. No paceman carried the workload of his team’s bowling attack on his shoulders in his eras muc