Skip to main content

32% decrease in India's 2023 funding in environment technology sector: Report

 
While pointing out that the year 2018 “marked a notable increase in both global and India-specific funding for environment technology”, a new report, released in the light of the World Earth Day, which fell on the 22nd of April 2024, regrets that investment in the Indian Environment Tech sector “experienced a decline to $1.68 billion in 2023, a 32% decrease from 2022.”
“As of the first three months of 2024, the funding stands at $0.24 billion”, the report, prepared by Tracxn Technologies, offering “a comprehensive overview of the funding, investments, acquisitions, unicorns and IPOs in the industry”, says that “the Indian Environment Tech sector has raised total funding of $7.3 billion to date.”
Called Environment Tech India Report, it says that India's environmental technology funding “saw substantial growth between 2018 and 2022, surging from $0.23 billion to $2.47 billion”, noting, “Environment tech funding in India peaked in 2022 at $2.47 billion.”
However, it regrets, the funding “experienced a decline to $1.68 billion in 2023, a 32% decrease from 2022. As of the first three months of 2024, the funding stands at $0.24 billion”, adding, “Despite the global increase in funding, India's share remained consistently low, ranging from 0% to 7%.”
The report says, “There was a significant spike in India's share in global funding in this space, to 5% in 2019 from 1% in 2018”, adding, “India’s share in global funding was 7% in 2022, the highest since 2011.”
Stating that Bengaluru ($2.7 billion) “tops the list in this space in terms of all-time city-wise funding, followed by Delhi ($1.2 billion) and Mumbai ($942 million)”, the report says, “This space has seen 14 IPOs and 25 acquisitions to date”, though adding, “Only 5 companies reported $100M+ rounds in 2023”, and “only one Unicorn has emerged in India so far -- Ola Electric.”

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.