Skip to main content

Gujarati Muslims 'have stopped seeking justice': India’s authoritarian trend?

 
Experts at a panel discussion held in Washington D.C have highlighted domestic and global challenges amidst rising concerns about economic inequality and a declining human rights environment in India. Along with providing background to these developments, the experts underscored the time that would be needed to reverse these trends. For the U.S., it will remain important to focus on human rights despite growing trade ties between the two countries as well as imperative to counterbalance China in the Indo-Pacific, they insisted.
The panel discussion was organised at the South Asia Perspectives (SAP) at the National Press Club timed with the publication of its June-August quarterly edition which focused on elections in South Asia. Given the centrality of India’s election, the event was titled “Navigating Crossroads: India’s economy, democracy and quest for human rights”.
Speakers at the event included SAP Editor Ambassador (ret`d) William B. Milam, Ambassador Islam Siddiqui, former US Chief Agricultural Negotiator, author Salil Tripathi, and human rights activist Sarita Pandey. Attendees included representatives from the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, Freedom House, US State Department, Hindus for Human Rights, and Indian American Muslim Council. Former diplomats, the World Bank analysts, journalists from Associated Press (AP), BBC and Voice of America also attended the event.
In his remarks, William B. Milam observed that, “Elections have consequences. What kind of consequences those in India will have is important to notice. India is moving slowly but surely in an authoritarian direction, which is a serious question for the United States, which is considering India as one of its main partners.”
He suggested analysts should pay special attention to the propaganda war being led by authoritarian governments. In his view, the anti-democratic propaganda war has been extremely effective. “Propaganda campaigns help lead to establish authoritarianism. And it takes over 20-30 years to happen”, Milam observed. He also expressed deep concerns about the anti-democratic trends in the United States and the rest of the world.
Author Salil Tripathi spoke about India’s economic development, highlighting truths that lay behind official data. “When people are talking high about India because of fancy malls, airports and breezes. I am worried because when the recession happened during the Asian economic crisis, likewise fancy structures became ghostly empty. In that context religious politics become dangerous. Because at that time when you can’t handle and grapple the real complex issues. The victims in such a scenario become the enemies of the state.”
Salil expressed sorrow that 80% percent of India’s unemployed are from the youth population, observing that even masters and PhD graduates are forced to apply for menial jobs due to the lack of job growth.
Referring to crony capitalism in India, Salil said, “If you are a foreign investor in India and Ambanis or Adanis are your competitors, either you will have to sell the business or make some agreements with them.”
Referring to economic inequalities and discriminations, Salil said that some Gujarati Muslims with whom he has spoken have stopped asking for justice. “They don’t expect justice. They just want to scale up in a professional capacity like doctors, engineers and accountants so that they can work for themselves. They fear no one would hire them and when their names are showed up in resume, they won’t get a call to be hired”, Salil added.
Propaganda campaigns help lead to establish authoritarianism. And it takes over 20-30 years to happen
In the absence of genuine economic growths, Salil observed, the majority and powerful population within the state start to feel persecuted. “The victims of such feelings, the minorities, turn into enemy of the state”, Salil said.
Ambassador Islam Siddiqui reviewed the expanding US-India trade relationship, looking both at the past and exploring current developments. Emphasizing India’s constitution Ambassador Siddiqui said, “India’s democracy has been rough and noisy sometimes yet the elected leadership has always paid allegiance to the constitution and secularism of India. This has helped thrive Indian democracy”.
Siddiqui observed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has used religious divisions as a political tool to energize his support base. “Mr. Modi didn’t respond to the crisis in Manipur where 65 thousand Christians had been displaced and more than 250 churches were burnt down. The Prime Minister acknowledged the crisis after six months, following his trip back from the United States”.
“The Biden administration is aware such things. However, for geopolitical reasons, to counterbalance China, the US is essentially ignoring gross human rights violations for the time being”, he added.
Journalist and rights activist Sarita Pandey provided a detailed account of the lack of press freedom in India and its implication for broader human rights. “Over the last ten years mainstream news has refused to provide any substantive coverage to the various scams, cons, illegalities and crimes of the Modi Administration, or of its various ministers and leaders, several of who have faced allegations of rape, assault and murder. Two months ago, it was revealed that Modi’s party had received a billion dollars at least in secret financial contributions. The news media worked overtime to protect Modi’s reputation rather than question him”, Sarita said.
On how the state apparatus are used to control media, Sarita focused on the Tehelka exposure related to the Gujrat genocide. "Modi’s close lieutenant in Gujarat and now India’s home minister – Shah was arrested, and his trial was on track. But after Modi became prime minister the judge was summarily transferred. The next judge refused to dismiss the case and ended up dead within a week. The third judge abruptly discharged Shah from the case, claiming, without explanation, the accused was wrongfully implicated for political reasons.”
Drawing on detailed references from Reporters Without Borders’ Committee to Protect Journalists, Sarita claimed that India has become one of the most dangerous countries for journalists.

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.