Skip to main content

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

 
India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank, Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 
The report highlights that a mere 2.5% of these startups have successfully raised Series A+ funding, primarily within the electric mobility sector. While more than 80% of these startups focus on emission reduction solutions, offerings aimed at enhancing resilience to climate change are considerably limited. It emphasizes that the challenge of securing growth-stage capital is a significant barrier for these companies as they strive to scale their innovations and maximize their impact. 
The report outlines sector concentration within the climate tech space: transport and mobility segments dominate, with over 350 startups capturing nearly 85% of total climate tech funding. In contrast, other critical areas like Industrial Decarbonization, Waste Management, and Alternative Fuels remain underfunded despite their substantial potential in combating climate change. 
Future prospects
The analysis identifies promising areas for innovation and growth, including decarbonization technologies, waste-to-value initiatives, and alternative fuels like biofuels and hydrogen. Published on September 20, 2024, the report titled “Innovation for Impact: Indian Startups Driving Climate Action” was launched at the Climate Action Summit—Building in India, for the World. It offers a comprehensive look at India's rapidly evolving climate tech sector and the essential role that startups play in tackling climate issues. 
A call for support
As the seventh most vulnerable nation to climate change, India stands at a crossroads of challenges and opportunities within its climate tech landscape. The report underlines the urgent need for not only enhanced financial backing but also supportive policies that can enable startups to thrive. 
Chintan Antani of IIMA Ventures stated, “The $3.6 billion raised by startups over the past decade underscores the substantial potential of this sector and the crucial need for increased support to help scale innovative solutions. Since 2012, IIMA Ventures has championed climate action, assisting over 100 startups and bridging knowledge gaps to foster collective efforts.” 
The report also highlights five transformative areas projected to reshape India's climate tech innovation: carbon capture technologies, waste-to-value solutions, growing alternative fuels, and the urgent necessity for innovative financial strategies to address a projected $1 trillion climate finance gap over the next decade.
Engagement at the summit
The Climate Action Summit drew a diverse group of stakeholders, including investors, entrepreneurs, corporate leaders, and sustainability experts. Prominent figures from sustainability sectors engaged in discussions about collaborative opportunities to advance climate tech solutions. 
Takuya Senoo from MUFG emphasized the importance of climate finance for achieving India’s net-zero goals: “It is imperative that we help climate tech startups scale up. By investing strategically, we can foster sustainable growth and resilience for all.” 
The Climate Action Summit has served as a pivotal platform for advancing growth and innovation within India’s climate tech ecosystem. Both IIMA Ventures and MUFG are committed to fostering this growth through the India Climate Tech Initiative, a program designed to support startups in navigating climate-related challenges. 

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...
Post a Comment
»

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?
3 comments
»

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.
Post a Comment
»