Skip to main content

Gujarat a police state? How top High Court advocate stunned a senior-most journalist

Rajdeep Sardesai, Anand Yagnik
This is a continuation of my earlier blog on well-known journalist Rajdeep Sardesai's lecture in memory of the late Achyut Yagnik at the Ahmedabad Management Association (AMA). I was a little surprised when I received the intimation about the venue for the lecture.
In Ahmedabad, as in the rest of Gujarat, it is generally not easy to secure a space for a lecture by someone whom the establishment considers anti-Narendra Modi, and Sardesai is no exception. I have attended lectures at AMA featuring individuals who are disliked by those in power. However, they are usually warned in advance to be cautious and to avoid saying anything that might offend the authorities.
One such speaker, about whose AMA lecture in 2022 I had written, was Prof. Kaushik Basu—a top-notch economist, former Chief Economic Advisor to the Manmohan Singh government, and former Chief Economist of the World Bank. He was extremely cautious when discussing topics on which he is otherwise known to be outspoken.
During the Q&A session, I asked Prof. Basu directly whether he believed India was slipping into hypernationalism and, if so, what its impact on the Indian economy would be. He had previously spoken about hypernationalism in Argentina and how it had harmed its economy.
Prof. Basu replied that there was certainly a "risk" but refused to elaborate further. A little later, he referred to hypernationalism in the U.S. under McCarthyism in the early 1950s, adding that the country had overcome the phenomenon before it was too late, allowing its economy to survive.
Indeed, Prof. Basu remained cautious when speaking about India. Was he advised not to comment directly on India in a negative manner? It would seem so, judging by what Prof. Kirit Parikh, another top economist who chaired the session, said. He remarked that Prof. Basu's lecture at AMA was delivered to a "private audience" and lamented how free speech in India today is under stress, with critics of the present government facing seditious charges.
Prof Kaushik Basu
While Prof. Parikh was measured in his remarks, Anand Yagnik, a senior High Court advocate who organized Rajdeep's lecture, was more forthright in his concluding remarks. He admitted to the audience that he had been apprehensive about whether the AMA hall would be granted for the lecture, given Rajdeep’s well-known anti-establishment stance in his TV appearances.
Anand noted that, until recently, dissenting views could still be expressed at institutions like the Mahatma Gandhi-founded Gujarat Vidyapeeth and the Sabarmati Ashram, which served as Gandhi’s karmabhoomi during the early years of the freedom movement until 1933. However, even these places are no longer available for open discourse, reflecting the severe curbs on freedom of speech in Ahmedabad, he stressed.
What he said next stunned Rajdeep: that the entire state of Gujarat has been under Section 144 for the last ten years, meaning that gatherings of more than four people for protests are prohibited. Rajdeep was so taken aback that he tweeted the following:
"You learn new things every day in life. While having the honour of delivering the Achyut Yagnik memorial lecture in Ahmedabad on media and democracy, I was reminded by the organisers that Gujarat has Section 144 orders across 33 districts CONTINUOUSLY in place since July 2015, when the Patidar agitation first took place. It has not been officially lifted for 10 YEARS!"
He added:
"Please digest this: for almost a decade now, Gujarat has Section 144 in place, giving the police enormous powers to stop any gathering of more than four people or any protest. Let me reiterate: for almost 10 YEARS, Gujarat has had Section 144 enforced across the state!"
Was Gujarat already a police state? Is that the conclusion Rajdeep and Anand were seeking to reach? And would th tweet have any impact? Or it would be just ignored as one more critique sought to be set aside by the Gujarat government? 
Let's wait and see...

Comments

TRENDING

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.