Skip to main content

PharmEasy: The only online medical store which revises prices upwards after confirming the order

For senior citizens — especially those without a family support system — ordering medicines online can be a great relief. Shruti and I have been doing this for the last couple of years, and with considerable success. We upload a prescription, receive a verification call from a doctor, and within two or three days, the medicines are delivered to our doorstep.
Given the stiff competition among online pharmacies, many of them offer rebates. Some even suggest switching to generic alternatives after we place the order. We sometimes agree, but we always make it clear that we won’t change brands for important medicines without consulting our doctor.
However, with competition has come unethical price manipulation.
In our experience, PharmEasy stands out as the worst offender. They initially attract you with a 27% discount. But after finalizing the cart, it drops to 24%. Even then, we’ve placed orders (we prefer cash on delivery). But after getting a confirmation, and just before dispatching the shipment, they increase the price of the medicines.
This happened to us in late April. We had ordered medicines worth over ₹5,000. While enjoying dosa at our favourite Chennai Express restaurant in Ahmedabad, I received an SMS informing me that the prices had been revised upward. Shocked, I canceled the order and left this review on the PharmEasy app:
> “After I ordered medicines at a certain price, PharmEasy hours later updated and revised the prices upward. Unethical — decided to cancel the order.”
They responded, asking us to email the order number. To our surprise, not only was the order canceled, but PharmEasy also removed the entire order history from our account! Still, on May 1, we emailed them with our phone number to find out if it had been an error.
Since then, we’ve received two responses. One, from Sandhya Nackwal on May 2, explained the revised pricing:
> “The products listed in the app are not linked to a fixed price. Thus, we share the estimated cost at the time of order placement, which can be either higher or lower than the actual price. We send you an SMS or push notification for the total discounted amount once your medicines are procured...”
The reply urged us to be patient and reorder. It added:
> “Sometimes, the MRP of medicines may vary depending on the stock received by the chemist. This variation is always due to manufacturer price changes. However, if the price on the packaging differs from the bill, please share an image highlighting the batch number so we can resolve the issue.”
Later, we received a phone call assuring us that this wouldn’t happen again and urging us to reorder. So we did, on May 3. I also sent another email on May 6:
> “Yours is the only platform that updates the price upwards after the order is placed and billed. Very strange, to say the least. We had to cancel the order twice, and now your representative tells us it won’t happen again, so he revived the cancelled order at the original price. Let’s see what happens now!”
But again, the prices were revised upward. After canceling the second order, we got another phone call with the same assurance. So we placed a third order — tempted by the best rebate.
This time, the total payable amount had gone down. Suspicious, I checked and realized they had simply reduced the quantity of medicines we had ordered while raising the prices of the rest. We canceled again and left this updated review:
> “Am forced to edit my review. Twice, after I ordered medicines, PharmEasy revised prices upward before delivery. Third time, they reduced the total amount but also reduced the number of medicines, while increasing some prices. Unethical, untrustworthy. Have canceled for the third time...”
It’s now been two weeks, and we keep getting calls from PharmEasy representatives. We hang up the moment we realize it’s them.
Out of curiosity, I browsed the app’s review section. To my dismay — but not surprise — many others have faced the same issue.
Prashant Arya (April 23):
> “I recently purchased a pharmaceutical product from this platform, and unfortunately, my experience was disappointing. The listed price was ₹80, but the final bill showed ₹100. Plus, additional platform fees made the overall cost even higher. The advertised price does not reflect the actual cost at checkout. Misleading and frustrating.”
M Mohan (January 18):
> “Prices changed between adding items to the cart and checkout. Discounts were shown initially but vanished later. Customer support was poor and unhelpful.”
Namrata Behera (April 30):
> “Most products are listed at a fair price, but at checkout, the price increases…”
Vedant Mule (May 12):
> “Don’t use this app. There’s a huge difference in the price shown on the product page and the cart…"
Each of these users gave a one-star rating. I don’t know whether PharmEasy is losing customers. Maybe not — they claim to have over four crore “satisfied” customers. Perhaps that’s why they don’t care about negative reviews.
But I still wonder: has PharmEasy ever tried to find out why no other app makes such bizarre upward price revisions after confirming an order?

Comments

TRENDING

Beyond the 'plum' posting: Why the caste lens still defines bureaucratic success

Following my recent blog on former IAS bureaucrat Atanu Chakraborty’s sudden exit as non-executive chairman of HDFC Bank, a few colleagues from the Gujarat cadre — mostly those I interacted with during my Gandhinagar stint (1997–2012) as the Times of India representative — reacted rather sharply. Most of them sent their responses directly on WhatsApp, touching upon on the merits and demerits of Chakraborty’s controversial move. One former IAS officer, a Dalit, however, went further, raising a broader question: why do some officials like Chakraborty secure plum post-retirement assignments, while others are overlooked?

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual.  I don't know who owns this site, for there is nothing on it in the About Us link. It merely says, the Nashik Corporation  site   "is an educational and news website of the municipal corporation. Today, education and payment of tax are completely online." It goes on to add, "So we provide some of the latest information about Property Tax, Water Tax, Marriage Certificate, Caste Certificate, etc. So all taxpayer can get all information of their municipal in a single place.some facts about legal and financial issues that different city corporations face, but I was least interested in them."  Surely, this didn't interest...

Population as destiny: The dangerous logic of India's new delimitation move

Dr. Narasimha Reddy Donthi, a noted public policy expert and public interest campaigner, in a  detailed critical analysis  of two Bills introduced in Parliament in April 2026—the  Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026  and the  Delimitation Bill, 2026 , has warned that the twin bills "raise significant constitutional, political and methodological concerns — most critically, a structural inconsistency in the census basis used for Parliament versus State Assemblies, and an over-reliance on population as the sole parameter for delimitation." 

Blaming RTE, not underfunding: Education groups hit back at NITI Aayog working paper

A preliminary working paper by Arvind Virmani, economist and member of the Government of India think tank NITI Aayog, has concluded that the Right to Education (RTE) Act — enacted to guarantee free and compulsory schooling for children between six and fourteen — has actually worsened learning outcomes rather than improved them. The paper, published in March 2026 and reported by The Print on 16 April, has drawn sharp pushback from education rights advocates, who argue it builds a politically motivated narrative against constitutionally guaranteed entitlements.

Exile, empire and memory: Khergamker's '10/3' invites researchers into a living archive

Author and legal commentator Gajanan Khergamker has made his  ebook  '10/3: Exile, Empire And War In The Andamans' publicly accessible online, a month after its limited offline digital launch on 10 March 2026. What began as a publication has, in Khergamker's own framing, transformed into a live, evolving research framework — Project 10/3 — inviting participation from researchers, institutions and citizens.

No gas in cities, no work in villages: Double disaster for India’s migrants

  A perfect storm of geopolitical crisis and policy paralysis is pushing India’s poorest into a devastating double-bind. The ongoing war in Iran has sent shockwaves through global oil markets, and as LPG prices skyrocket and factory slowdowns ripple across urban centers, a massive exodus of migrant workers is underway. But for millions fleeing the city’s hardships, the safety net of rural employment has all but vanished, leaving them stranded without work or income.

Civil society flags widespread violations of land acquisition Act before Parliamentary panel

  Civil society organisations and stakeholders from across India have presented stark evidence before the  Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj , alleging systemic violations of the  Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (RFCTLARR) Act, 2013 , particularly in  Scheduled Areas  and tribal regions.

The financial engine behind America’s 'toxic' petrochemical expansion, claims report

 A new report,  Toxic Finance , has sought to expose the critical role of the global financial sector in driving a massive and controversial expansion of the  petrochemical industry  across the United States. The analysis, compiled by a coalition of environmental and human rights organizations including the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and  Break Free From Plastic , claims that banks and investors have provided the vast sums of capital necessary to build over 100 new facilities or expansions, despite significant risks to human health, the climate, and the financial system itself.

Ambedkar’s radical legacy fueled resurgence in Gujarat Dalit agitations: Study

  Over the past decade and a half,  Gujarat  has witnessed a remarkable resurgence of Dalit agitations that mark a decisive shift from accommodation to confrontation, according to a major new study published in the journal  National Identities . The research, conducted by  Mahendra Parmar  of the  Central University of Gujarat , draws on 18 in-depth interviews with victims and activists to document how  B.R. Ambedkar ’s radical thought has become the central political resource shaping Dalit identity and mobilisation in the state.