Skip to main content

Report exposes human rights gaps in India's $36 billion garment export industry

 
A new report sheds light on the urgent human rights challenges within India’s vast textile and garment industry, as global regulations increasingly demand corporate accountability in supply chains. Titled “Beneath the Seams,” the study reveals that despite the sector employing over 45 million people, systemic issues of poverty wagesunfair purchasing practices, and the exclusion of workers from decision-making persist, leaving millions vulnerable.
The report, published by Change Alliance and the Fair Trade Advocacy Office, consolidates findings from multi-stakeholder workshops held in Delhi, Bengaluru, and Tiruppur. It comes at a critical time as laws like the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) begin to mandate human rights and environmental due diligence for companies operating in the EU market, directly impacting major exporting nations like India.
A central finding is the widespread confusion and failure to ensure living wages and incomes. The report highlights a critical gap between the legally mandated minimum wage and a living wage that covers basic needs like food, housing, and healthcare. Workers, suppliers, and even factory management often conflate the two concepts.
Suppliers stated they cannot raise wages unless brands pay fairer prices, while brands’ public commitments to living wages frequently fail to be integrated into binding contracts or costing models. The result is that many workers, a majority of whom are women and migrants, remain trapped in poverty despite full-time employment.
Exploitative purchasing practices by international brands were identified as a root cause of poor working conditions. Practices such as demanding rapid deliveries at low costs, last-minute order changes, and order cancellations—exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic—transfer all financial risk to suppliers. This pressure leads to wage suppression, forced overtime, and widespread subcontracting to informal units where worker protections vanish. Furthermore, when brands face compliance issues, they often resort to abrupt “cut-and-run” disengagement, leaving workers jobless without compensation, as there is no binding framework for responsible exit.
The report also underscores a profound lack of meaningful engagement with the workers and communities at the heart of the supply chain. Existing grievance mechanisms, like Internal Complaints Committees, are widely distrusted, with workers fearing retaliation. Social audits are costly yet have limited impact, often conducted without genuine worker involvement. Women and migrant workers are systematically excluded from decision-making processes, and trade unions face shrinking space in dialogues, sometimes being stigmatised as “anti-business.”
The report calls for decisive action from multiple stakeholders. It urges the Indian and other South Asian governments to strengthen laws, enforce living wages, protect informal workers, and restart comprehensive labour data collection. For the European Union, it recommends ensuring the CSDDD mandates full supply chain coverage, bans unfair purchasing practices, and requires meaningful stakeholder consultation and responsible disengagement. International institutions are called upon to promote living wage standards, support worker participation, and improve grievance mechanisms.
The document concludes that without binding legislation, shared financial responsibility, and a fundamental shift to include workers’ voices, new due diligence laws risk becoming another compliance exercise that fails to improve lives on the ground. As one workshop participant noted, the disconnect is stark: “The government talks about ‘ease of doing business’ but ignores ‘ease of living’ for workers.” The report positions the current moment as a pivotal opportunity to reshape the industry into one that is equitable, sustainable, and respectful of the rights of the millions who fuel its global success.

Comments

TRENDING

Ram, Bam and Bengal: Memories of a Left turn towards the Right

The BJP’s massive electoral win in West Bengal is being interpreted across political persuasions — except, of course, by the BJP itself — as the result of the alleged deletion of around 90 lakh voters from the electoral rolls during the controversial intensive revision process. This may well be true, given my own experience in Gujarat regarding the shoddy manner in which electoral revisions have often been conducted. In West Bengal, there also appeared to be a political angle to the exercise. But I am not interested in discussing that here, as enough has already appeared in the media on the subject.

Pseudoscience? A Chandigarh man's brain-hacking claim nobody knows how to handle!

I receive a lot of unsolicited material in my line of work — op-eds, press releases, open letters, manifestos. But the document that landed in my inbox recently gave me pause in a way that most don't. It came formatted as a formal submission, signed by a Chandigarh resident called Sumeet, addressed to me in my capacity as someone who works with editorial and public interest content. The subject line read: Submission as Cyber and Human Rights Volunteer – Cyber Ethics and Human Rights Concerns.

China's hukou and India's caste: A comparison that ignores the Jianmin

The other day, I saw an interesting article, "Does China have a caste system or is it a figment of imagination of Indians?" It wonders whether "China, the world's manufacturing powerhouse and a socialist state governed by a Communist party", has a birth-based caste system that shapes access to education, healthcare, and opportunity.